Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

China --- History --- Politics and government --- S06/1050 --- S06/1040 --- S04/0921 --- China: Politics and government--The First Years of the Cultural Revolution (1966-69) --- China: Politics and government--Socialist Education Movement (1962-65) --- China: History--PRC: 1966 - 1976

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Un officier nazi fracasse la tête d’un nouveau-né contre un mur, un soldat SS ricane devant le spectacle de la déchéance du vieillard pour l’obtention d’un morceau de pain ; ce sont là des faits désormais connus du cauchemar hitlérien. Mais, ces images interrogent : cet officier, ce soldat ont été, un temps, des bébés graciles et merveilleux comme tous les bébés du monde, des écoliers à la sympathique turbulence, des adolescents qui ont frémi au premier « Je t’aime »... Qu’est-ce qui a fait de ces ex-bébés, ex-écoliers et ex-adolescents les monstres que l’on sait ? Parmi tous les facteurs qui peuvent expliquer ces transformations, Hubert Hannoun se penche sur celui de l’éducation. Quelle éducation peut fabriquer un monstre ? Question qui en porte une seconde : l’expression d’éducation nazie n’est-elle pas contradictoire si éduquer c’est élever, dans tous les sens de ce terme ? Pour y répondre, Hubert Hannoun analyse de très nombreux textes d’idéologues pré-nazis et nazis. S’il étudie plus spécialement le Mein Kampf d’Adolf Hitler, il se réfère, de plus, à tous les auteurs qui, avant lui, l’ont annoncé ou, à son époque, soutenu. Parmi les auteurs français, il rappelle les idées de M. Barrés, de Bonald, A. Carrel, P. Drieu La Rochelle, J.-A. Gobineau, G. Le Bon, J. de Maistre, Ch. Mourras, G. Vacher de la Pouge ; parmi les auteurs allemands, il cite E.-M. Arndt, H.-S. Chamberlain, J.-G. Fichte, M. Heidegger, J.-G. Herder, E. Krieck, P.-A. Lagarde (Botticher), F.-W. Nietzsche, A. Rosenberg. Son constat, après analyse, est double : - Il n’est aucune affirmation des théoriciens de l’éducation nazie de l’époque hitlérienne qui n’ait été déjà formulée par d’autres idéologues -— français ou allemand — des siècles précédents. En ce sens, l’apport de l’ère hitlérienne en la matière est nul. - L’édifice théorique nazi ne comporte aucune contradiction interne mais se fonde dans sa totalité sur trois principes infondés voire en contradiction avec les données de l’expérience.…

Education and national socialism --- Enseignement et national-socialisme --- Enseignement national-socialiste --- Enseignement nazi --- Nationaal-socialisme en onderwijs --- Nationaal-socialistisch onderwijs --- National socialism and education --- National socialist education --- National-socialisme et enseignement --- Nazi education --- Nazi-onderwijs --- Onderwijs en nationaal-socialisme --- Education --- Higher education and state --- Nazisme et éducation --- Enseignement supérieur --- History --- Political aspects --- Histoire --- Politique gouvernementale --- Aspect politique --- History. --- Nazisme et éducation --- Enseignement supérieur --- éducation --- enfant --- propagande --- fascisme --- nazisme --- élève --- endoctrinement --- dressage --- Hitler, Adolf (1889-1945). Mein Kampf --- Éducation --- National-socialisme --- Idéologie --- National-socialisme et éducation --- Philosophie --- Allemagne --- 1900-1945

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Education and national socialism --- Enseignement et national-socialisme --- Enseignement national-socialiste --- Enseignement nazi --- Nationaal-socialisme en onderwijs --- Nationaal-socialistisch onderwijs --- National socialism and education --- National socialist education --- National-socialisme et enseignement --- Nazi education --- Nazi-onderwijs --- Onderwijs en nationaal-socialisme --- 378.4 <43 HEIDELBERG> --- Higher education and state --- -National socialism and education --- Education --- Education, Higher --- State and higher education --- Education and state --- Universiteiten--Duitsland voor 1945 en na 1989--HEIDELBERG --- Government policy --- Universitat Heidelberg --- -Heidelberg. --- Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg --- Grossherzoglich Badische Ruprecht-Carolinische Universität zu Heidelberg --- Badische Ruprecht-Karls-Universität --- Heidelberg (Germany). --- University of Heidelberg --- Ruperto Carola (University) --- Ruprecht-Karls-Universität (Heidelberg, Germany) --- Universidad Heidelberg --- Litterarum Universitas Heidelbergensis Ruperto-Carolae --- Academia Heidelbergensis --- Hochschule Heidelberg --- Ruprecht-Karls-Hochschule zu Heidelberg --- Ruprecht-Karls-University (Heidelberg, Germany) --- History --- -378.4 <43 HEIDELBERG> --- -History --- 378.4 <43 HEIDELBERG> Universiteiten--Duitsland voor 1945 en na 1989--HEIDELBERG --- -Education and national socialism --- -Higher education and state --- Universität Heidelberg --- Heidelberg. --- Universität Heidelberg --- Germany --- Heidelberg (Germany). Universität Heidelberg

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

The tumult of the Cultural Revolution after 1966 is often blamed on a few leaders in Beijing, or on long-term egalitarian ideals, or on communist or Chinese political cultures. Lynn White shows, however, that the chaos resulted mainly from reactions by masses of individuals and small groups to three specific policies of administrative manipulation: labeling groups, designating bosses, and legitimating violence in political campaigns. These habits of local organization were common after 1949 and gave the state success in short-term revolutionary aims, despite scarce resources and staff--but they also drove millions to attack each other later.First, measures accumulated before 1966 to give people bad or good names (such as "rightist" or "worker"); these set a family's access to employment, education, residence, and rations--so they gave interests to potential conflict groups. Second, policies for bossism went far beyond Confucian patronage patterns, making work units tightly dependent on Party monitors--so rational individuals either pandered to local bosses or (when they could) deposed them. Third, the institutionalized violence of political campaigns both mobilized activists and scared others into compliance. These organizational measures were often effective in the short run before 1966 but accumulated social costs that China paid later. The book ends with comparisons to past cases of mass urban ostracism in other countries, and it suggests how such tragedies may be forecast or prevented in the future.Originally published in 1989.The Princeton Legacy Library uses the latest print-on-demand technology to again make available previously out-of-print books from the distinguished backlist of Princeton University Press. These editions preserve the original texts of these important books while presenting them in durable paperback and hardcover editions. The goal of the Princeton Legacy Library is to vastly increase access to the rich scholarly heritage found in the thousands of books published by Princeton University Press since its founding in 1905.

S06/1050 --- S06/0421 --- S06/0425 --- S06/1040 --- China: Politics and government--The First Years of the Cultural Revolution (1966-69) --- China: Politics and government--CCP: 1949 - 1966 --- China: Politics and government--Organization and structure of the CCP --- China: Politics and government--Socialist Education Movement (1962-65) --- S04/0921 --- S11/0900 --- S06/0422 --- S02/0200 --- China: History--PRC: 1966 - 1976 --- China: Social sciences--Social pathology, social deviance (incl. infanticide, abandoned children, hoodlums) --- China: Politics and government--CCP: 1966 - 1976 --- China: General works--Civilization and culture --- China --- Cina --- Kinë --- Cathay --- Chinese National Government --- Chung-kuo kuo min cheng fu --- Republic of China (1912-1949) --- Kuo min cheng fu (China : 1912-1949) --- Chung-hua min kuo (1912-1949) --- Kina (China) --- National Government (1912-1949) --- China (Republic : 1912-1949) --- People's Republic of China --- Chinese People's Republic --- Chung-hua jen min kung ho kuo --- Central People's Government of Communist China --- Chung yang jen min cheng fu --- Chung-hua chung yang jen min kung ho kuo --- Central Government of the People's Republic of China --- Zhonghua Renmin Gongheguo --- Zhong hua ren min gong he guo --- Kitaĭskai︠a︡ Narodnai︠a︡ Respublika --- Činská lidová republika --- RRT --- Republik Rakjat Tiongkok --- KNR --- Kytaĭsʹka Narodna Respublika --- Jumhūriyat al-Ṣīn al-Shaʻbīyah --- RRC --- Kitaĭ --- Kínai Népköztársaság --- Chūka Jinmin Kyōwakoku --- Erets Sin --- Sin --- Sāthāranarat Prachāchon Čhīn --- P.R. China --- PR China --- Chung-kuo --- Zhongguo --- Zhonghuaminguo (1912-1949) --- Zhong guo --- Chine --- République Populaire de Chine --- República Popular China --- Catay --- VR China --- VRChina --- 中國 --- 中国 --- 中华人民共和国 --- Jhongguó --- Bu̇gu̇de Nayiramdaxu Dundadu Arad Ulus --- Bu̇gu̇de Nayiramdaqu Dumdadu Arad Ulus --- Bu̇gd Naĭramdakh Dundad Ard Uls --- Khi︠a︡tad --- Kitad --- Dumdadu Ulus --- Dumdad Uls --- Думдад Улс --- Kitajska --- Politics and government --- -History --- -Cultural Revolution, 1966-1976. --- History --- Histoire --- Politique et gouvernement --- China -- History -- Cultural Revolution, 1966-1976. --- China -- Politics and government -- 1949-1976.