Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
This Special Issue “Consumer Preferences and Acceptance of Meat Products” demonstrates that the value of different palatability traits has evolved over time. Moreover, consumer acceptance and preference are not solely determined by the inputs of the meat itself, but can also be influenced by various demographic factors. In addition, consumers’ views of meat products vary regionally and by species.
actinidin --- consumer acceptance --- consumer sensory testing --- eating quality --- grass-fed beef --- Meat Standards Australia (MSA) --- proteolysis --- sensory testing --- quality --- tenderness --- oxidation --- colour --- sensory --- acceptability --- beef --- consumer perceptions --- patties --- tempeh --- consumers --- attitude --- sheepmeat --- premium --- holistic product development --- consumer --- enhancement --- fajita --- muscle --- phosphate --- sodium bicarbonate --- lamb age --- sensory evaluation --- flavor --- meat purchase decision-making --- meat buying criteria --- extended postmortem aging --- demographics --- satisfaction --- focus group --- meat products --- qualitative multivariate analysis --- conjoint analysis --- older adults --- consumer sensory --- pork --- lamb --- juiciness --- demographic --- yearling --- longissimus --- semimembranosus --- cross-cultural --- n/a
Choose an application
This Special Issue “Consumer Preferences and Acceptance of Meat Products” demonstrates that the value of different palatability traits has evolved over time. Moreover, consumer acceptance and preference are not solely determined by the inputs of the meat itself, but can also be influenced by various demographic factors. In addition, consumers’ views of meat products vary regionally and by species.
Research & information: general --- Biology, life sciences --- Food & society --- actinidin --- consumer acceptance --- consumer sensory testing --- eating quality --- grass-fed beef --- Meat Standards Australia (MSA) --- proteolysis --- sensory testing --- quality --- tenderness --- oxidation --- colour --- sensory --- acceptability --- beef --- consumer perceptions --- patties --- tempeh --- consumers --- attitude --- sheepmeat --- premium --- holistic product development --- consumer --- enhancement --- fajita --- muscle --- phosphate --- sodium bicarbonate --- lamb age --- sensory evaluation --- flavor --- meat purchase decision-making --- meat buying criteria --- extended postmortem aging --- demographics --- satisfaction --- focus group --- meat products --- qualitative multivariate analysis --- conjoint analysis --- older adults --- consumer sensory --- pork --- lamb --- juiciness --- demographic --- yearling --- longissimus --- semimembranosus --- cross-cultural --- actinidin --- consumer acceptance --- consumer sensory testing --- eating quality --- grass-fed beef --- Meat Standards Australia (MSA) --- proteolysis --- sensory testing --- quality --- tenderness --- oxidation --- colour --- sensory --- acceptability --- beef --- consumer perceptions --- patties --- tempeh --- consumers --- attitude --- sheepmeat --- premium --- holistic product development --- consumer --- enhancement --- fajita --- muscle --- phosphate --- sodium bicarbonate --- lamb age --- sensory evaluation --- flavor --- meat purchase decision-making --- meat buying criteria --- extended postmortem aging --- demographics --- satisfaction --- focus group --- meat products --- qualitative multivariate analysis --- conjoint analysis --- older adults --- consumer sensory --- pork --- lamb --- juiciness --- demographic --- yearling --- longissimus --- semimembranosus --- cross-cultural
Choose an application
Cosmetic products undergo nowadays rigorous Quality Control testing to ensure that they are safe and stable and that their claims are substantiated by scientifically robust data. Quality Control tests used in the pharmaceutical industry can be applicable also for cosmetic formulations. However, claim substantiation testing is unique to cosmetic products. To enable time- and cost-effective quality control testing, assessment methodologies constantly keep evolving. This Special Issue includes manuscripts that explore all stages of Quality Control testing for cosmetic products, i.e., (1) physicochemical stability testing; (2) microbial stability testing; (3) efficacy testing including objective/subjective claim substantiation testing and the evaluation of sensorial properties; (4) toxicological/safety testing with emphasis on current and evolving methodologies that replace animal testing.
safety --- cosmetics --- botanicals --- toxicology --- TTC --- solar elastosis --- collagen type I --- solar radiation --- non-melanoma skin cancers --- photoaging --- tattoos --- permanent makeup --- PMU --- colorants --- pigments --- cosmetic product safety --- non-animal-testing methodologies --- dermal absorption --- skin irritation --- skin sensitization --- genotoxicity --- endocrine disruptors --- active compounds --- assay --- cosmeceutics --- functional cosmetics --- HPLC–UV --- labelling --- retinoids --- tocopherol --- ubiquinone --- β carotene --- stability testing --- stability protocol --- accelerated ageing --- shelf life --- minimally disruptive formulas --- direct to consumer --- retail model --- sensory testing --- refractive index --- critical wavelength --- turbidity --- skin hydration --- creams --- n/a --- HPLC-UV
Choose an application
Cosmetic products undergo nowadays rigorous Quality Control testing to ensure that they are safe and stable and that their claims are substantiated by scientifically robust data. Quality Control tests used in the pharmaceutical industry can be applicable also for cosmetic formulations. However, claim substantiation testing is unique to cosmetic products. To enable time- and cost-effective quality control testing, assessment methodologies constantly keep evolving. This Special Issue includes manuscripts that explore all stages of Quality Control testing for cosmetic products, i.e., (1) physicochemical stability testing; (2) microbial stability testing; (3) efficacy testing including objective/subjective claim substantiation testing and the evaluation of sensorial properties; (4) toxicological/safety testing with emphasis on current and evolving methodologies that replace animal testing.
Research & information: general --- Chemistry --- Physical chemistry --- safety --- cosmetics --- botanicals --- toxicology --- TTC --- solar elastosis --- collagen type I --- solar radiation --- non-melanoma skin cancers --- photoaging --- tattoos --- permanent makeup --- PMU --- colorants --- pigments --- cosmetic product safety --- non-animal-testing methodologies --- dermal absorption --- skin irritation --- skin sensitization --- genotoxicity --- endocrine disruptors --- active compounds --- assay --- cosmeceutics --- functional cosmetics --- HPLC-UV --- labelling --- retinoids --- tocopherol --- ubiquinone --- β carotene --- stability testing --- stability protocol --- accelerated ageing --- shelf life --- minimally disruptive formulas --- direct to consumer --- retail model --- sensory testing --- refractive index --- critical wavelength --- turbidity --- skin hydration --- creams --- safety --- cosmetics --- botanicals --- toxicology --- TTC --- solar elastosis --- collagen type I --- solar radiation --- non-melanoma skin cancers --- photoaging --- tattoos --- permanent makeup --- PMU --- colorants --- pigments --- cosmetic product safety --- non-animal-testing methodologies --- dermal absorption --- skin irritation --- skin sensitization --- genotoxicity --- endocrine disruptors --- active compounds --- assay --- cosmeceutics --- functional cosmetics --- HPLC-UV --- labelling --- retinoids --- tocopherol --- ubiquinone --- β carotene --- stability testing --- stability protocol --- accelerated ageing --- shelf life --- minimally disruptive formulas --- direct to consumer --- retail model --- sensory testing --- refractive index --- critical wavelength --- turbidity --- skin hydration --- creams
Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|