Narrow your search

Library

LUCA School of Arts (3)

Odisee (3)

Thomas More Kempen (3)

Thomas More Mechelen (3)

UCLL (3)

VIVES (3)

VUB (2)

DOAJ (1)

KU Leuven (1)

ULB (1)

More...

Resource type

book (2)

periodical (1)


Language

English (3)


Year
From To Submit

2017 (1)

2002 (1)

1984 (1)

Listing 1 - 3 of 3
Sort by

Periodical
Scientonomy : journal for the science of science.
Author:
ISSN: 25609076 Year: 2017 Publisher: Toronto : University of Toronto,

Science and values : the aims of science and their role in scientific debate
Author:
ISBN: 1282383000 9786612383007 0520908112 9780520908116 0520052676 9780520052673 0520057430 9780520057432 Year: 1984 Publisher: Berkeley : University of California Press,

Loading...
Export citation

Choose an application

Bookmark

Abstract

Laudan constructs a fresh approach to a longtime problem for the philosopher of science: how to explain the simultaneous and widespread presence of both agreement and disagreement in science. Laudan critiques the logical empiricists and the post-positivists as he stresses the need for centrality and values and the interdependence of values, methods, and facts as prerequisites to solving the problems of consensus and dissent in science.

Prematurity in scientific discovery : on resistance and neglect
Author:
ISBN: 0520927737 9786612356728 1282356720 1597348309 9780520927735 0585441162 9780585441160 9780520231061 0520231066 9780520231078 0520231074 9781597348300 6612356723 0520231066 0520231074 9781282356726 Year: 2002 Publisher: Berkeley : University of California Press,

Loading...
Export citation

Choose an application

Bookmark

Abstract

For centuries, observers have noted the many obstacles to intellectual change in science. In a much-discussed paper published in Scientific American in 1972, molecular biologist Gunther Stent proposed an explicit criterion for one kind of obstacle to scientific discovery. He denoted a claim or hypothesis as "premature" if its implications cannot be connected to canonical knowledge by a simple series of logical steps. Further, Stent suggested that it was appropriate for the scientific community to ignore such hypotheses so that it would not be overwhelmed by vast numbers of false leads. In this volume, eminent scientists, physicians, historians, social scientists, and philosophers respond to Stent's thesis.

Listing 1 - 3 of 3
Sort by