Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This open access book explores the impact of deep regional economic integration on spillovers of knowledge and technology across countries. Deep integration through signing deep regional trade agreements (DRTAs), which cover various policy areas in addition to tariff reductions, may or may not facilitate technology spillovers among their signatories. To understand the mechanism of the impact of deep integration on technology spillovers, this book starts by analyzing the behavior of global firms. Factors that affect global firms' activities, such as export, foreign direct investment (FDI), offshore outsourcing, are examined. Micro data on Japanese firms are employed for the analysis. Then, the relationships between bilateral trade patterns and technology spillovers and between types of FDI and technology spillovers are investigated in detail. Patent citation data are used to measure technology spillovers. Finally, the impact of DRTAs on international technology spillovers is analyzed.

International economic integration. --- Technology transfer --- deep integration --- regional trade agreement --- technology spillovers --- global firms --- Tobin’s q --- foreign direct investment --- globalization strategy --- offshore outsourcing --- firm heterogeneity --- Open Access --- Economic aspects. --- deep integration --- regional trade agreement --- technology spillovers --- global firms --- Tobin’s q --- foreign direct investment --- globalization strategy --- offshore outsourcing --- firm heterogeneity --- Open Access

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Preferential trade agreements are growing in number and deepening in content by incorporating disciplines that go beyond market access. They increasingly encompass non-trade-related disciplines as diverse as intellectual property rights, environment laws, or labor market regulations. Moreover, because investment is complementary to trade, preferential trade agreements provide relevant institutional frameworks to partner countries that wish to regulate their foreign investments. This paper studies the impact of deep trade agreements on foreign direct investment and examines three sub-questions. First, is the impact of trade agreements on foreign direct investment heterogeneous across types of business activity Second, is this impact heterogeneous across disciplines covered in the agreements Third, does the level of development of home and host countries matter for this impact The analysis exploits the World Bank's data set on the content of preferential trade agreement and data on announcements of bilateral greenfield investment at the activity level. The findings show that deep trade agreements matter for investment: every additional discipline in a preferential trade agreement increases foreign direct investment by 1.4 percent, on average. Deep agreements do not impact foreign direct investment in natural resources and extractive activities and have heterogeneous effects across manufacturing- and services-related activities. The results also reveal that disciplines that go beyond the mandate the World Trade Organization matter more for foreign direct investment. Disciplines related to investment liberalization and protection, intellectual property rights, or migration increase foreign direct investment, whereas disciplines on labor market regulations reduce investment. The results are mostly driven by investment between developed and developing countries.

Deep Integration --- Foreign Direct Investment --- Globalization and Financial Integration --- International Economics and Trade --- International Trade and Trade Rules --- Preferential Trade Agreements --- Regional Trade Agreement --- Regional Trade Integration --- Regionalism --- Trade Agreements --- Trade and Regional Integration --- Trade Finance and Investment

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Trade liberalization can spur environmental degradation. Concerns over these adverse impacts have led to a debate over the need for environmental provisions in regional trade agreements (RTAs), however the effectiveness of such provisions is unknown. This paper provides new causal evidence that environmental provisions are effective in limiting deforestation following the entry into force of RTAs. It exploits high-resolution, satellite-derived estimates of deforestation and identify the content of RTAs using a new dataset with detailed information on individual provisions. Accounting for the potential endogeneity of environmental provisions in RTAs, the paper finds that the inclusion of specific provisions aimed at protecting forests and/or biodiversity entirely offsets the net increases in forest loss observed in similar RTAs without such provisions. The inclusion of these provisions limits agricultural land expansion, but does not completely offset increases in total agricultural production. The effects are concentrated in tropical, developing countries with greater biodiversity.

Climate Change --- Deforestation --- Environment --- Environmental Disasters and Degradation --- Environmental Economics and Policies --- Environmental Policy --- Environmental Protection --- International Economics and Trade --- International Trade and Trade Rules --- Regional Trade Agreement --- Trade and Regional Integration --- Trade Liberalization --- Trade Policy

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This study aims to draw key lessons for the African Continental Free Trade Area using evidence from within the region. Although drawing lessons from the rest of the world is essential, given the unique features of economies in the Africa region, the most relevant lessons can be drawn from the experiences of regional economic communities in the continent. The study draws on the eight regional economic communities that have been recognized by the African Union as pillars on which the continent will rely to implement the African Continental Free Trade Area. The study evaluates the trade creation and trade diversion impacts of each of the eight RECs and examines their performance with the goal of drawing lessons and identifying challenges for the success of the African Continental Free Trade Area. Despite significant heterogeneities, there is more trade creation than trade diversion and a generally positive impact on trade within the regional economic communities. Two regional economic communities in particular-the East African Community and the Southern African Development Community-outperform all the other regional economic communities in terms of boosting intra-regional economic community trade. This is mainly associated with the high level of investment in trade facilitation, the level of synergy between national and regional goals, the density of economic activity, and the advancement in the quantity and quality of regional infrastructure. There are also many challenges that policy makers should address to realize the objectives of the African Continental Free Trade Area and transform the continent. Learning from the regional economic communities is central. But, given the scope of the African Continental Free Trade Area, there is also a need to examine the transition from regional economic communities to the African Continental Free Trade Area, which is expected to be a sticky transition.

African Continental Free Trade Area --- Customs Union --- Free Trade --- Free Trade Area --- International Economics and Trade --- International Trade and Trade Rules --- Regional Economic Community --- Regional Trade Agreement --- Rules of Origin --- Trade and Regional Integration --- Trade Creation --- Trade Diversion --- Trade Liberalization