Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Drawing from doctoral level research on how best to teach business education to college students, Discourses on Business Education at the College Level illustrates new and proven ideas for engaging students. Sixteen authors from New York University's Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development describe their experiences in upgrading and expanding the quality of the business education experience. Business school instructors can use this edited collection to draw inspiration and learn specific techniques to bring their courses to the cutting edge of curriculum. Topics range from teaching accounting, financial literacy, marketing, and teamwork to gamification, improving international student and intern experience, not-for credit education, and virtual workplace learning.

Business education --- Business --- Commercial education --- Education, Business --- Education --- Study and teaching --- E-books --- Business education. --- Business schools. --- MBA. --- Master of Business Administration. --- New York University. --- PhD student output. --- accounting. --- business. --- collaborative publication. --- college business education instruction. --- college business school curricula. --- curriculum design. --- economics. --- education research. --- improving business education. --- learning outcomes. --- management. --- methodology. --- pedagogy. --- postgraduate education. --- research on college business students. --- teaching.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

"Avidly Reads is a series of short books about how culture makes us feel. Founded in 2012 by Sarah Blackwood and Sarah Mesle, Avidly—an online magazine supported by the Los Angeles Review of Books—specializes in short-form critical essays devoted to thinking and feeling. Avidly Reads is an exciting new series featuring books that are part memoir, part cultural criticism, each bringing to life the author’s emotional relationship to a cultural artifact or experience. Avidly Reads invites us to explore the surprising pleasures and obstacles of everyday life. This is a story about the emotional lives of ideas. As an avowed “theory head,” Jordan Alexander Stein confronts a contradiction: that the abstract, and often frustrating rigors of theory also produced a sense of pride and identity for him and his friends: an idea of how to be and a way to live. Although Stein explains what theory is, this is not an introduction or a how-to. Organized around five ways that theory makes us feel—silly, stupid, sexy, seething and stuck—Stein travels back to the late nineties to tell a story of coming of age at a particular moment and to measure how that moment lives on now."--

Culture. --- Theory (Philosophy) --- Affect. --- Anger. --- Catharine MacKinnon. --- Continental philosophy. --- Critical theory. --- Debate. --- Fantasy. --- Feminism. --- Gender and sexuality. --- Immanuel Kant. --- Jacques Lacan. --- Jokes. --- Julia Kristeva. --- Lipstick. --- Literary theory. --- Marxism. --- Memes. --- Michel Foucault. --- Postgraduate education. --- Queer. --- Sexuality. --- Stuckness. --- Stupidity. --- Theodor W Adorno. --- gift books.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Higher education has been considered both an ‘engine’ for innovation and a ‘catalyst’ for sustainability development; the integration of both the innovation engine and sustainability catalyst roles are discussed in a recently published Special Issue on the theme of Higher Education in Innovation Ecosystems in the journal Sustainability. Based on 16 articles contributing to the Special Issue from various perspectives, the Special Issue editors have developed an overarching framework about the relationships between higher education and innovation ecosystems. In the framework, we re-define the concept of innovation ecosystem and identify emerging roles of universities in developing sustainable innovation ecosystems. Re-conceptualization of innovation ecosystems In the editorial of the Special Issue, innovation ecosystem is defined as: co-innovation networks in which actors from organizations concerned with the functions of knowledge production, wealth creation, and norm control interact with each other in forming co-evolution and interdependent relations (both direct or indirect) in cross-geographical contexts and through which new ideas and approaches from various internal and external sources are integrated into a platform to generate shared values for the sustainable transformation of society. Compared with most commonly cited definitions of innovation ecosystem, our definition highlights three new aspects of interactions in co-innovation networks: cross-sectoral, transnational, and indirect, drawing insights from the literature including innovation, geography, and biology studies. The roles of universities in innovation ecosystems The emerging roles of universities in innovation ecosystems are as follows: (1) The role of universities is changing from being a central player in technology transfer to being an anchor in knowledge exchange; (2) universities are assuming a new role in trust-building between actors in innovation ecosystems; and (3) universities are not merely an entrepreneurial universities but are also institutional entrepreneur in the innovation ecosystem. The three emerging roles all indicate that universities are becoming the catalysts for sustainable development in innovation ecosystems. Knowledge exchange is crucial for sustainability; trust is the foundation of the sustainable networks; social entrepreneurship is indispensable for sustainable social change. Evidence in wider contexts A total of 44 authors from 10 countries contributed to the discussions on the changing roles of higher education in innovation ecosystems from varying perspectives. They also report transformations within higher education and universities’ responses to both external and internal transformations. When addressing these issues, the studies provide both theoretical and methodological contributions to the research on higher education in innovation ecosystems. The 16 articles can be generally placed into four categories: (1) new demands for universities arising from the transformation in society toward innovation ecosystems, (2) transformations within higher education responding to emerging societal demands, (3) dynamics of the interaction of university with other innovation actors in a transnational context, and (4) academic and student mobility for higher education innovation. Calling for a new research agenda While societal changes demand broader roles of universities, they also call for and leads to substantial changes within the internal fabric of the university. The innovations in both society and the universities necessitate a renewed understanding of higher education in society, which has become a new research agenda in studies on innovation in higher education. We hope our Special Issue will inspire and encourage more scholars to join the research field.

Humanities --- Education --- transnational industry cooperation --- transnational university cooperation --- transnational innovation ecosystem --- EU–China --- science, technology and innovation cooperation --- transdisciplinary approach --- artificial intelligence --- machine learning --- Higher Education --- University --- Entrepreneurial competences --- Employability --- Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) --- Open Innovation --- business creation --- technology transfer --- innovation --- innovation ecosystem --- entrepreneurship education --- science and technology --- sustainability --- higher education --- educational innovation --- Mexico --- academic mobility --- knowledge transfer --- higher education innovation --- institutional environment --- postgraduate education --- education level --- discipline background --- graduation institution --- R&amp --- D investment --- triple helix --- synergy mechanism --- national system of innovation --- China --- Belt and Road Initiative --- developmental model of intercultural sensitivity --- general model of instructional communication --- instructional beliefs model --- intercultural communication competence model --- green GDP --- environment --- sustainable development --- global innovation systems --- Chinese research university --- faculty income --- academic labor market --- ordinary labor market --- joint R&amp --- D institute --- institutional logics --- China’s innovation system --- China’s transnational Triple Helix linkages --- problem-solving --- critical reflection --- knowledge integration --- social learning --- systemic thinking --- entrepreneurial university --- entrepreneurship --- influencing factors --- sustainable universities --- corporate sustainability --- tensions --- integrative framework --- Finnish universities --- higher education system --- social entrepreneurship --- entrepreneurial universities --- business model innovation --- socialist economies --- Cuba --- knowledge brokers --- knowledge intensive policies --- smart specialisation --- innovation ecosystems --- global talent --- social integration --- economic integration --- Chinese student --- Finland --- university --- third mission --- knowledge-based society --- global innovation networks --- transnational industry cooperation --- transnational university cooperation --- transnational innovation ecosystem --- EU–China --- science, technology and innovation cooperation --- transdisciplinary approach --- artificial intelligence --- machine learning --- Higher Education --- University --- Entrepreneurial competences --- Employability --- Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) --- Open Innovation --- business creation --- technology transfer --- innovation --- innovation ecosystem --- entrepreneurship education --- science and technology --- sustainability --- higher education --- educational innovation --- Mexico --- academic mobility --- knowledge transfer --- higher education innovation --- institutional environment --- postgraduate education --- education level --- discipline background --- graduation institution --- R&amp --- D investment --- triple helix --- synergy mechanism --- national system of innovation --- China --- Belt and Road Initiative --- developmental model of intercultural sensitivity --- general model of instructional communication --- instructional beliefs model --- intercultural communication competence model --- green GDP --- environment --- sustainable development --- global innovation systems --- Chinese research university --- faculty income --- academic labor market --- ordinary labor market --- joint R&amp --- D institute --- institutional logics --- China’s innovation system --- China’s transnational Triple Helix linkages --- problem-solving --- critical reflection --- knowledge integration --- social learning --- systemic thinking --- entrepreneurial university --- entrepreneurship --- influencing factors --- sustainable universities --- corporate sustainability --- tensions --- integrative framework --- Finnish universities --- higher education system --- social entrepreneurship --- entrepreneurial universities --- business model innovation --- socialist economies --- Cuba --- knowledge brokers --- knowledge intensive policies --- smart specialisation --- innovation ecosystems --- global talent --- social integration --- economic integration --- Chinese student --- Finland --- university --- third mission --- knowledge-based society --- global innovation networks

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Higher education has been considered both an ‘engine’ for innovation and a ‘catalyst’ for sustainability development; the integration of both the innovation engine and sustainability catalyst roles are discussed in a recently published Special Issue on the theme of Higher Education in Innovation Ecosystems in the journal Sustainability. Based on 16 articles contributing to the Special Issue from various perspectives, the Special Issue editors have developed an overarching framework about the relationships between higher education and innovation ecosystems. In the framework, we re-define the concept of innovation ecosystem and identify emerging roles of universities in developing sustainable innovation ecosystems. Re-conceptualization of innovation ecosystems In the editorial of the Special Issue, innovation ecosystem is defined as: co-innovation networks in which actors from organizations concerned with the functions of knowledge production, wealth creation, and norm control interact with each other in forming co-evolution and interdependent relations (both direct or indirect) in cross-geographical contexts and through which new ideas and approaches from various internal and external sources are integrated into a platform to generate shared values for the sustainable transformation of society. Compared with most commonly cited definitions of innovation ecosystem, our definition highlights three new aspects of interactions in co-innovation networks: cross-sectoral, transnational, and indirect, drawing insights from the literature including innovation, geography, and biology studies. The roles of universities in innovation ecosystems The emerging roles of universities in innovation ecosystems are as follows: (1) The role of universities is changing from being a central player in technology transfer to being an anchor in knowledge exchange; (2) universities are assuming a new role in trust-building between actors in innovation ecosystems; and (3) universities are not merely an entrepreneurial universities but are also institutional entrepreneur in the innovation ecosystem. The three emerging roles all indicate that universities are becoming the catalysts for sustainable development in innovation ecosystems. Knowledge exchange is crucial for sustainability; trust is the foundation of the sustainable networks; social entrepreneurship is indispensable for sustainable social change. Evidence in wider contexts A total of 44 authors from 10 countries contributed to the discussions on the changing roles of higher education in innovation ecosystems from varying perspectives. They also report transformations within higher education and universities’ responses to both external and internal transformations. When addressing these issues, the studies provide both theoretical and methodological contributions to the research on higher education in innovation ecosystems. The 16 articles can be generally placed into four categories: (1) new demands for universities arising from the transformation in society toward innovation ecosystems, (2) transformations within higher education responding to emerging societal demands, (3) dynamics of the interaction of university with other innovation actors in a transnational context, and (4) academic and student mobility for higher education innovation. Calling for a new research agenda While societal changes demand broader roles of universities, they also call for and leads to substantial changes within the internal fabric of the university. The innovations in both society and the universities necessitate a renewed understanding of higher education in society, which has become a new research agenda in studies on innovation in higher education. We hope our Special Issue will inspire and encourage more scholars to join the research field.

transnational industry cooperation --- transnational university cooperation --- transnational innovation ecosystem --- EU–China --- science, technology and innovation cooperation --- transdisciplinary approach --- artificial intelligence --- machine learning --- Higher Education --- University --- Entrepreneurial competences --- Employability --- Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) --- Open Innovation --- business creation --- technology transfer --- innovation --- innovation ecosystem --- entrepreneurship education --- science and technology --- sustainability --- higher education --- educational innovation --- Mexico --- academic mobility --- knowledge transfer --- higher education innovation --- institutional environment --- postgraduate education --- education level --- discipline background --- graduation institution --- R&amp --- D investment --- triple helix --- synergy mechanism --- national system of innovation --- China --- Belt and Road Initiative --- developmental model of intercultural sensitivity --- general model of instructional communication --- instructional beliefs model --- intercultural communication competence model --- green GDP --- environment --- sustainable development --- global innovation systems --- Chinese research university --- faculty income --- academic labor market --- ordinary labor market --- joint R&amp --- D institute --- institutional logics --- China’s innovation system --- China’s transnational Triple Helix linkages --- problem-solving --- critical reflection --- knowledge integration --- social learning --- systemic thinking --- entrepreneurial university --- entrepreneurship --- influencing factors --- sustainable universities --- corporate sustainability --- tensions --- integrative framework --- Finnish universities --- higher education system --- social entrepreneurship --- entrepreneurial universities --- business model innovation --- socialist economies --- Cuba --- knowledge brokers --- knowledge intensive policies --- smart specialisation --- innovation ecosystems --- global talent --- social integration --- economic integration --- Chinese student --- Finland --- university --- third mission --- knowledge-based society --- global innovation networks