Listing 1 - 7 of 7 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
This book provides an extensive and up-to-date review of one of the most important topics in contemporary political life - trust.
Choose an application
Over the last two decades, the literature on political participation has flourished, reflecting the increasing use of diverse modes of citizen involvement. These include established modes of participation, such as voting, protests, mass demonstrations, and petition signing, but also newer modes specific to the online environment (ICT-related), participation in referendums, public consultations, or engagement in political deliberation. The importance and intensity of these modes is reflected both in the number of people getting involved and in the increasing number of policies that are subject to various modes of participation on a regular basis. There is extensive literature about how these modes of participation function, why people get involved, and the consequences of their participation. However, limited attention is paid to the relationship between political participation and the pursuit of sustainability at a local, regional, or central level. Existing studies indicate that citizen engagement can be a cost-effective method to characterize changes of local environments; however, not much is known beyond this process. This Special Issue aims to address this void in the literature and brings together contributions that analyze how participation can be associated with sustainability and local development in various settings. It explores the relationship between political participation and the management of their local environment. This Special Issue enhances the existing knowledge and understanding about how modes of participation can be reflected in stronger sustainability. The Special Issue provides the space for an academic debate that addresses issues such as climate change, resource allocation, or the pursuit of sustainability programs and policies. The contributions include a mix of single-case studies and comparative analyses across European countries.
Technology: general issues --- deliberation --- future generations --- future design --- political participation --- citizen engagement --- political institutions --- sustainability --- participation --- digitalization --- local government --- innovation --- mixed deliberation --- referendums --- municipal mergers --- democratic sustainability --- social trust --- political trust --- political efficacy --- citizens’ juries --- natural experiment --- opinion change --- windfarms --- Scotland --- deliberative mini-publics --- democratic innovations --- public opinion --- participatory budgeting --- ecology --- local level --- citizens --- support --- Romania --- citizens’ assemblies --- climate change --- decarbonization --- agenda setting --- deliberative democracy --- mini-publics --- environmental politics --- deliberation --- future generations --- future design --- political participation --- citizen engagement --- political institutions --- sustainability --- participation --- digitalization --- local government --- innovation --- mixed deliberation --- referendums --- municipal mergers --- democratic sustainability --- social trust --- political trust --- political efficacy --- citizens’ juries --- natural experiment --- opinion change --- windfarms --- Scotland --- deliberative mini-publics --- democratic innovations --- public opinion --- participatory budgeting --- ecology --- local level --- citizens --- support --- Romania --- citizens’ assemblies --- climate change --- decarbonization --- agenda setting --- deliberative democracy --- mini-publics --- environmental politics
Choose an application
An important factor for public confidence in the nuclear regulator is the general public trust of the government and its representatives, which is clearly not the same in all countries. These workshop proceedings identify a number of common principles for the communication of nuclear regulatory decisions that can be recommended to all regulators. They have been cited in particular for their ability to help build, measure and/or improve overall public confidence in the nuclear regulator.
Nuclear energy -- Government policy -- Congresses. --- Nuclear energy. --- OECD Nuclear Energy Agency -- Public opinion -- Congresses. --- Political trust. --- Power resources. --- Nuclear energy --- Industries --- Business & Economics --- Government policy --- OECD Nuclear Energy Agency --- Public opinion --- Atomic energy --- Atomic power --- Energy, Atomic --- Energy, Nuclear --- Nuclear power --- Power, Atomic --- Power, Nuclear --- NEA --- Nuclear Energy Agency --- OECD. NEA --- Force and energy --- Nuclear physics --- Power resources --- Nuclear engineering --- Nuclear facilities --- Nuclear power plants --- OCDE. Agence pour l'énergie nucléaire --- Canada --- Energie nucléaire --- Congresses. --- Politique gouvernementale --- Congrès
Choose an application
Over the last two decades, the literature on political participation has flourished, reflecting the increasing use of diverse modes of citizen involvement. These include established modes of participation, such as voting, protests, mass demonstrations, and petition signing, but also newer modes specific to the online environment (ICT-related), participation in referendums, public consultations, or engagement in political deliberation. The importance and intensity of these modes is reflected both in the number of people getting involved and in the increasing number of policies that are subject to various modes of participation on a regular basis. There is extensive literature about how these modes of participation function, why people get involved, and the consequences of their participation. However, limited attention is paid to the relationship between political participation and the pursuit of sustainability at a local, regional, or central level. Existing studies indicate that citizen engagement can be a cost-effective method to characterize changes of local environments; however, not much is known beyond this process. This Special Issue aims to address this void in the literature and brings together contributions that analyze how participation can be associated with sustainability and local development in various settings. It explores the relationship between political participation and the management of their local environment. This Special Issue enhances the existing knowledge and understanding about how modes of participation can be reflected in stronger sustainability. The Special Issue provides the space for an academic debate that addresses issues such as climate change, resource allocation, or the pursuit of sustainability programs and policies. The contributions include a mix of single-case studies and comparative analyses across European countries.
Technology: general issues --- deliberation --- future generations --- future design --- political participation --- citizen engagement --- political institutions --- sustainability --- participation --- digitalization --- local government --- innovation --- mixed deliberation --- referendums --- municipal mergers --- democratic sustainability --- social trust --- political trust --- political efficacy --- citizens’ juries --- natural experiment --- opinion change --- windfarms --- Scotland --- deliberative mini-publics --- democratic innovations --- public opinion --- participatory budgeting --- ecology --- local level --- citizens --- support --- Romania --- citizens’ assemblies --- climate change --- decarbonization --- agenda setting --- deliberative democracy --- mini-publics --- environmental politics
Choose an application
Over the last two decades, the literature on political participation has flourished, reflecting the increasing use of diverse modes of citizen involvement. These include established modes of participation, such as voting, protests, mass demonstrations, and petition signing, but also newer modes specific to the online environment (ICT-related), participation in referendums, public consultations, or engagement in political deliberation. The importance and intensity of these modes is reflected both in the number of people getting involved and in the increasing number of policies that are subject to various modes of participation on a regular basis. There is extensive literature about how these modes of participation function, why people get involved, and the consequences of their participation. However, limited attention is paid to the relationship between political participation and the pursuit of sustainability at a local, regional, or central level. Existing studies indicate that citizen engagement can be a cost-effective method to characterize changes of local environments; however, not much is known beyond this process. This Special Issue aims to address this void in the literature and brings together contributions that analyze how participation can be associated with sustainability and local development in various settings. It explores the relationship between political participation and the management of their local environment. This Special Issue enhances the existing knowledge and understanding about how modes of participation can be reflected in stronger sustainability. The Special Issue provides the space for an academic debate that addresses issues such as climate change, resource allocation, or the pursuit of sustainability programs and policies. The contributions include a mix of single-case studies and comparative analyses across European countries.
deliberation --- future generations --- future design --- political participation --- citizen engagement --- political institutions --- sustainability --- participation --- digitalization --- local government --- innovation --- mixed deliberation --- referendums --- municipal mergers --- democratic sustainability --- social trust --- political trust --- political efficacy --- citizens’ juries --- natural experiment --- opinion change --- windfarms --- Scotland --- deliberative mini-publics --- democratic innovations --- public opinion --- participatory budgeting --- ecology --- local level --- citizens --- support --- Romania --- citizens’ assemblies --- climate change --- decarbonization --- agenda setting --- deliberative democracy --- mini-publics --- environmental politics
Choose an application
The American National Election Studies (ANES) is the premier social science survey program devoted to voting and elections. Conducted during the presidential election years and midterm Congressional elections, the survey is based on interviews with voters and delves into why they make certain choices. In this edited volume, John Aldrich and Kathleen McGraw bring together a group of leading social scientists that developed and tested new measures that might be added to the ANES, with the ultimate goal of extending scholarly understanding of the causes and consequences of electoral outcomes. The contributors--leading experts from several disciplines in the fields of polling, public opinion, survey methodology, and elections and voting behavior--illuminate some of the most important questions and results from the ANES 2006 pilot study. They look at such varied topics as self-monitoring in the expression of political attitudes, personal values and political orientations, alternate measures of political trust, perceptions of similarity and disagreement in partisan groups, measuring ambivalence about government, gender preferences in politics, and the political issues of abortion, crime, and taxes. Testing new ideas in the study of politics and the political psychology of voting choices and turnout, this collection is an invaluable resource for all students and scholars working to understand the American electorate.
Public opinion --- Elections --- Public opinion polls --- Election forecasting --- Electoral politics --- Franchise --- Polls --- Political science --- Politics, Practical --- Plebiscite --- Political campaigns --- Representative government and representation --- Opinion polls --- Polls, Public opinion --- Public opinion research --- Straw votes --- Social surveys --- Market surveys --- Public opinion. --- Research --- 2006 ANES Pilot Study. --- ANES update. --- ANES. --- American National Election Studies. --- Online Commons. --- abortion. --- crime. --- elections. --- gold standard. --- personality characteristics. --- pilot studies. --- political attitudes. --- political controversy. --- political orientation. --- political topics. --- political trust. --- public opinion surveys. --- public opinion. --- question battery. --- questionnaire design. --- self-monitoring. --- social science survey. --- social science. --- survey design. --- survey research. --- taxes. --- voting behavior. --- voting. --- United States
Choose an application
Americans are disgusted with watching politicians screaming and yelling at one another on television. But does all the noise really make a difference? Drawing on numerous studies, Diana Mutz provides the first comprehensive look at the consequences of in-your-face politics. Her book contradicts the conventional wisdom by documenting both the benefits and the drawbacks of in-your-face media."In-your-face" politics refers to both the level of incivility and the up-close and personal way that we experience political conflict on television. Just as actual physical closeness intensifies people's emotional reactions to others, the appearance of closeness on a video screen has similar effects. We tend to keep our distance from those with whom we disagree. Modern media, however, puts those we dislike in our faces in a way that intensifies our negative reactions. Mutz finds that incivility is particularly detrimental to facilitating respect for oppositional political viewpoints and to citizens' levels of trust in politicians and the political process. On the positive side, incivility and close-up camera perspectives contribute to making politics more physiologically arousing and entertaining to viewers. This encourages more attention to political programs, stimulates recall of the content, and encourages people to relay content to others.In the end, In-Your-Face Politics demonstrates why political incivility is not easily dismissed as a disservice to democracy-it may even be a necessity in an age with so much competition for citizens' attention.
Mass media --- Television in politics --- Political aspects --- United States. --- Internet. --- audiences. --- audiovisual medium. --- autonomic nervous system. --- broadcasts. --- camera perspective. --- civil behavior. --- closeness. --- democracy. --- democratic process. --- emotional arousal. --- excitation. --- experimental treatments. --- government. --- in-your-face politics. --- incivility. --- interpersonal distance. --- mainstream media. --- media effects. --- news consumption. --- news programs. --- newspapers. --- opposition. --- polarization. --- polite conversation. --- political advocates. --- political communication. --- political conflict. --- political cynicism. --- political discourse. --- political incivility. --- political programs. --- political television. --- political trust. --- political views. --- politicians. --- politics. --- public controversy. --- public perceptions. --- radio. --- real world. --- shout shows. --- television. --- viewership data. --- violent media. --- visual content.
Listing 1 - 7 of 7 |
Sort by
|