Listing 1 - 10 of 15 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Les forêts denses humides d’Afrique centrale contribuent de près ou de loin à la viabilité de chaque être-vivant sur cette planète. Ces écosystèmes jouent un rôle crucial dans la régulation du cycle de l’eau, la conservation de la biodiversité, ou encore l’atténuation des effets indésirables du changement climatique. En outre, ces espaces forestiers riches et diversifiés constituent le lieu de vie de sociétés humaines depuis des millénaires. De nombreux produits forestiers ligneux et non-ligneux sont indispensables dans l’assouvissement de leurs besoins essentiels tels que l’alimentation, l’habitat, la santé et la culture. Ce travail de fin d’études a pour objectifs de quantifier les services écosystémiques culturels et les services d’approvisionnement en bois-énergie et en bois de construction fournis par les forêts du Sud-Est du Cameroun aux populations locales. Trois villages au Sud-Est du Cameroun (Malen I, Mintoum, Eschiambor) ont été étudiés. Ils sont situés dans des configurations contrastées par rapport aux affectations des terres forestières en usage au Cameroun. Le premier village (Malen I) est exempt d’exploitation forestière au vu de sa situation à l’intérieur d’une aire protégée (Réserve de Biosphère du Dja). Les deux autres sont situés au sein de forêts communautaires, gérées exclusivement par les communautés villageoises : Mintoum est situé entre une concession forestière certifiée FSC et une aire protégée (Réserve de Biosphère du Dja), tandis qu’Eschiambor se situe en bordure d’UFA certifiées et non-certifiées. Ces différentes zones présentent des modes de gestion contrastés ainsi qu’une pression anthropique variable. La qualité des services écosystémiques offerts par la forêt aux populations mérite donc d’être comparée au sein de ces différentes affectations. L’importance de l’approvisionnement en bois-énergie et en bois de construction a été analysée dans chacun de ces villages. Différents lieux de collecte de bois-énergie ont été cartographiés au sein du finage. A l’aide de méthodes d’évaluations sociales et biophysiques, les quantités et les habitudes relatives à l’utilisation de ces deux ressources ligneuses ont été évaluées. Les quantités de bois utilisées par 55 ménages témoins ont été quantifiées durant une période de 10 à 12 semaines de suivi journalier. Sur le plan culturel, l’étude s’intéresse, à l’aide d’entretiens semi-dirigés, aux services écosystémiques culturels fournis par les forêts à ces communautés villageoises. Les services étudiés sont le patrimoine culturel (rites et les traditions), la relaxation et l’éducation. Les différents lieux d’intérêt recensés ont été spatialisés au sein des finages villageois. S’il est vrai que l’étendue de la zone agricole au sein du finage constitue l’un des facteurs de la déforestation dans ces zones, les quantités de bois utilisées dans les trois villages étudiés montrent quant à elles que les prélèvements domestiques sont minimes. Des différences en termes d’habitation ont également été relevées entre les villages gérant une forêt communautaire et celui situé dans l’aire protégée. L’accès aux essences commerciales débitées par les scies mobiles de la communauté facilite l’accès à la ressource ligneuse pour les habitants d’une forêt communautaire. Les volumes de bois utilisés y sont donc plus importants que dans les zones où l’exploitation y est absente. En termes d’essences utilisées pour les poteaux de construction, des similitudes ont été constatées entre les différentes ethnies étudiées. L’étude montre également que l’importance culturelle de la forêt n’est pas particulièrement liée à l’isolement d’une communauté humaine. En effet, les habitants du village situé à l’intérieur de la Réserve de Biosphère du Dja ont perdu l’ensemble de leurs traditions culturelles, bien que ce village soit le plus enclavé et isolé des axes de communication. La perception de l’importance et de l’existence de ces services varie plutôt selon des critères intrinsèques à la condition individuelle, tels que l’âge, le genre, les sources de revenus et l’origine ethnique. Quantification of the cultural ecosystem services and wood-energy and timber supply provided by the south-eastern forests of Cameroon to local populations: The dense humid forests of Central Africa contribute in some way to the viability of every living being on this planet. These ecosystems play a crucial role in regulating the water cycle, conserving biodiversity and mitigating the adverse effects of climate change. Moreover, these rich and diverse forest areas have been home to human societies for thousands of years. Many wood and non-timber forest products are essential in meeting their basic needs such as food, shelter, health and cultivation. This end-of-studies work aims to quantify the cultural ecosystem services and wood energy and timber supply services provided by the forests of south-eastern Cameroon to local populations. Three villages in southeast Cameroon (Malen I, Mintoum, Eschiambor) were studied. They are located in contrasting configurations to forest land uses. The first village (Malen I) is free from logging due to its location within a protected area (Dja Biosphere Reserve). The other two are located within community forests, managed exclusively by village communities: Mintoum is located between an FSC certified forest concession and a protected area (Dja Biosphere Reserve), while Eschiambor is located on the edge of certified and non-certified FMUs. These different zones present contrasting management methods as well as variable anthropic pressure. The quality of ecosystem services provided by forests to people therefore deserves to be compared within these different uses. The importance of wood energy and timber supply was analysed in each of these villages. Various wood-energy collection sites have been mapped within the village territory. Using social and biophysical assessment methods, the quantities and patterns of use of these two wood resources were assessed. The quantities of wood used by 55 control households were quantified during a period of 10 to 12 weeks of daily monitoring. At the cultural level, the study focuses, through semi-structured interviews, on the cultural ecosystem services provided by forests to these village communities. The services studied are cultural heritage (rites and traditions), relaxation and education. The various places of interest identified were spatialized within the village territory. While it is true that the extent of the agricultural zone within the village territory is one of the factors of deforestation in these zones, the quantities of wood used in the three villages studied show that domestic removals are minimal. Habitat differences were also noted between villages managing a community forest and one located in the protected area. Access to commercial species cut by mobile saws in the community facilitates access to the wood resource for the inhabitants of a community forest. The volumes of wood used are therefore greater than in areas where logging is absent. In terms of the species used for construction poles, similarities were observed between the different ethnic groups studied. The study also shows that the cultural importance of the forest is not particularly related to the isolation of a human community. Indeed, the inhabitants of the village located inside the Dja Biosphere Reserve have lost all their cultural traditions, although this village is the most isolated and isolated of the communication axes. Rather, the perception of the importance and existence of these services varies according to criteria intrinsic to individual condition, such as age, gender, sources of income and ethnic origin.
Services écosystémiques, Bois de construction, Bois-énergie, Patrimoine culturel, Rites, Traditions, Finage villageois, Méthodes d’évaluations sociales et biophysiques, Cartographie participative, Entretiens semi-dirigés --- Ecosystem services, Construction timber, Wood energy, Cultural heritage, Rites, Traditions, Village finishing, Social and biophysical assessment methods, Participatory mapping, Semi-directed interviews --- Sciences du vivant > Sciences de l'environnement & écologie
Choose an application
This Special Issue, “Mapping Indigenous Knowledge in the Digital Age”, explores Indigenous engagement with geo-information in contemporary cartography. Indigenous mapping, incorporating performance, process, product, and positionality as well as tangible and intangible heritage, is speedily entering the domain of cartography, and digital technology is facilitating the engagement of communities in mapping their own locational stories, histories, cultural heritage, environmental, and political priorities. In this publication, multimodal and multisensory online maps combine the latest multimedia and telecommunications technology to examine data and support qualitative and quantitative research, as well as to present and store a wide range of temporal/spatial information and archival materials in innovative interactive storytelling formats. It will be of particular interest to researchers engaged in studies of global human and environmental connection in the age of evolving information technology.
Research & information: general --- Geography --- transdisciplinary research --- knowledge dialog --- participatory mapping --- qualitative analysis --- community-based management --- Dawes --- allotment --- GIS --- map --- automation --- PLSS --- geographic information systems --- reservation --- indigenous --- Standing Rock --- community mapping --- learning community --- natural resources management --- Cyberatlas --- Native Americans --- first nations --- historic cartography --- toponymy --- Indigenous maps --- indigital --- undergraduate education --- native science --- Inuinnait --- Inuinnaqtun --- cybercartography --- digital return --- multi-media cartography --- digital heritage --- native guidance system --- Lençóis Maranhenses region --- Maranhão coast --- traditional communities --- Cybercartographic Atlas --- indigenous mappings --- decolonial cartography --- mythical spaces and indigenous orientations --- sky map --- collaborative work --- Pa Ipai --- Baja California --- Mexico --- mapping --- reconciliation --- art --- digital pedagogy --- reflexivity --- Cybercartography --- GIAMedia --- FOSS --- intercultural literacy --- n/a --- Lençóis Maranhenses region --- Maranhão coast
Choose an application
This Special Issue, “Mapping Indigenous Knowledge in the Digital Age”, explores Indigenous engagement with geo-information in contemporary cartography. Indigenous mapping, incorporating performance, process, product, and positionality as well as tangible and intangible heritage, is speedily entering the domain of cartography, and digital technology is facilitating the engagement of communities in mapping their own locational stories, histories, cultural heritage, environmental, and political priorities. In this publication, multimodal and multisensory online maps combine the latest multimedia and telecommunications technology to examine data and support qualitative and quantitative research, as well as to present and store a wide range of temporal/spatial information and archival materials in innovative interactive storytelling formats. It will be of particular interest to researchers engaged in studies of global human and environmental connection in the age of evolving information technology.
transdisciplinary research --- knowledge dialog --- participatory mapping --- qualitative analysis --- community-based management --- Dawes --- allotment --- GIS --- map --- automation --- PLSS --- geographic information systems --- reservation --- indigenous --- Standing Rock --- community mapping --- learning community --- natural resources management --- Cyberatlas --- Native Americans --- first nations --- historic cartography --- toponymy --- Indigenous maps --- indigital --- undergraduate education --- native science --- Inuinnait --- Inuinnaqtun --- cybercartography --- digital return --- multi-media cartography --- digital heritage --- native guidance system --- Lençóis Maranhenses region --- Maranhão coast --- traditional communities --- Cybercartographic Atlas --- indigenous mappings --- decolonial cartography --- mythical spaces and indigenous orientations --- sky map --- collaborative work --- Pa Ipai --- Baja California --- Mexico --- mapping --- reconciliation --- art --- digital pedagogy --- reflexivity --- Cybercartography --- GIAMedia --- FOSS --- intercultural literacy --- n/a --- Lençóis Maranhenses region --- Maranhão coast
Choose an application
This Special Issue, “Mapping Indigenous Knowledge in the Digital Age”, explores Indigenous engagement with geo-information in contemporary cartography. Indigenous mapping, incorporating performance, process, product, and positionality as well as tangible and intangible heritage, is speedily entering the domain of cartography, and digital technology is facilitating the engagement of communities in mapping their own locational stories, histories, cultural heritage, environmental, and political priorities. In this publication, multimodal and multisensory online maps combine the latest multimedia and telecommunications technology to examine data and support qualitative and quantitative research, as well as to present and store a wide range of temporal/spatial information and archival materials in innovative interactive storytelling formats. It will be of particular interest to researchers engaged in studies of global human and environmental connection in the age of evolving information technology.
Research & information: general --- Geography --- transdisciplinary research --- knowledge dialog --- participatory mapping --- qualitative analysis --- community-based management --- Dawes --- allotment --- GIS --- map --- automation --- PLSS --- geographic information systems --- reservation --- indigenous --- Standing Rock --- community mapping --- learning community --- natural resources management --- Cyberatlas --- Native Americans --- first nations --- historic cartography --- toponymy --- Indigenous maps --- indigital --- undergraduate education --- native science --- Inuinnait --- Inuinnaqtun --- cybercartography --- digital return --- multi-media cartography --- digital heritage --- native guidance system --- Lençóis Maranhenses region --- Maranhão coast --- traditional communities --- Cybercartographic Atlas --- indigenous mappings --- decolonial cartography --- mythical spaces and indigenous orientations --- sky map --- collaborative work --- Pa Ipai --- Baja California --- Mexico --- mapping --- reconciliation --- art --- digital pedagogy --- reflexivity --- Cybercartography --- GIAMedia --- FOSS --- intercultural literacy --- transdisciplinary research --- knowledge dialog --- participatory mapping --- qualitative analysis --- community-based management --- Dawes --- allotment --- GIS --- map --- automation --- PLSS --- geographic information systems --- reservation --- indigenous --- Standing Rock --- community mapping --- learning community --- natural resources management --- Cyberatlas --- Native Americans --- first nations --- historic cartography --- toponymy --- Indigenous maps --- indigital --- undergraduate education --- native science --- Inuinnait --- Inuinnaqtun --- cybercartography --- digital return --- multi-media cartography --- digital heritage --- native guidance system --- Lençóis Maranhenses region --- Maranhão coast --- traditional communities --- Cybercartographic Atlas --- indigenous mappings --- decolonial cartography --- mythical spaces and indigenous orientations --- sky map --- collaborative work --- Pa Ipai --- Baja California --- Mexico --- mapping --- reconciliation --- art --- digital pedagogy --- reflexivity --- Cybercartography --- GIAMedia --- FOSS --- intercultural literacy
Choose an application
Parks and protected areas provide important services to nature and society. Park managers make difficult decisions to achieve their diverse mandates, and need current, relevant, and rigorous information. However, effective use of research provided by social scientists, natural scientists, local people, or Indigenous people is an ongoing challenge. Through case studies, this book examines knowledge mobilization in parks and protected areas, with a focus on successes and failures, barriers and enablers, diverse theoretical frameworks, and structural innovations. This book embraces the generation and use of knowledge, especially natural science, social science, local knowledge, and Indigenous knowledge, in relation to policy, planning, and management of parks and protected areas.
Research & information: general --- pastoral enclosures --- vernacular architecture --- minor rural buildings --- art of dry-stone walling --- indigenous and community conserved areas --- Galicia --- Cornwall --- forestry heritage --- heathland and grassland conservation --- plant biodiversity --- protected areas --- knowledge governance --- cross-scale management --- knowledge systems --- temporal dimensions --- time --- local tacit experiential knowledge --- participatory mapping --- conservation planning --- connectivity conservation --- wildlife movement pathways --- ecological corridors --- Yosemite National Park --- ethnographic databases --- ethnography --- National Park Service --- cultural resource management --- tribal co-management --- Southern Sierra Miwuk --- Mono Lake Paiute --- data sources --- Indigenous knowledge --- industrial development --- semi-aquatic mammals --- knowledge mobilization --- evidence-based decision making --- Indigenous Knowledge --- traditional knowledge --- traditional ecological knowledge --- subsistence, caribou --- Iñupiat, Alaska --- national parks --- co-management --- social science --- natural science --- local knowledge --- indigenous knowledge --- parks and protected areas management --- biosphere reserve --- co-design --- transdisciplinary practices --- public participation geographic information system (PPGIS) --- softGIS --- parks planning --- Delta --- structured decision-making --- evidence --- wildlife --- management effectiveness --- grizzly bears --- decision-making --- evidence-informed policy --- Alberta Parks --- research --- n/a --- Iñupiat, Alaska
Choose an application
Parks and protected areas provide important services to nature and society. Park managers make difficult decisions to achieve their diverse mandates, and need current, relevant, and rigorous information. However, effective use of research provided by social scientists, natural scientists, local people, or Indigenous people is an ongoing challenge. Through case studies, this book examines knowledge mobilization in parks and protected areas, with a focus on successes and failures, barriers and enablers, diverse theoretical frameworks, and structural innovations. This book embraces the generation and use of knowledge, especially natural science, social science, local knowledge, and Indigenous knowledge, in relation to policy, planning, and management of parks and protected areas.
pastoral enclosures --- vernacular architecture --- minor rural buildings --- art of dry-stone walling --- indigenous and community conserved areas --- Galicia --- Cornwall --- forestry heritage --- heathland and grassland conservation --- plant biodiversity --- protected areas --- knowledge governance --- cross-scale management --- knowledge systems --- temporal dimensions --- time --- local tacit experiential knowledge --- participatory mapping --- conservation planning --- connectivity conservation --- wildlife movement pathways --- ecological corridors --- Yosemite National Park --- ethnographic databases --- ethnography --- National Park Service --- cultural resource management --- tribal co-management --- Southern Sierra Miwuk --- Mono Lake Paiute --- data sources --- Indigenous knowledge --- industrial development --- semi-aquatic mammals --- knowledge mobilization --- evidence-based decision making --- Indigenous Knowledge --- traditional knowledge --- traditional ecological knowledge --- subsistence, caribou --- Iñupiat, Alaska --- national parks --- co-management --- social science --- natural science --- local knowledge --- indigenous knowledge --- parks and protected areas management --- biosphere reserve --- co-design --- transdisciplinary practices --- public participation geographic information system (PPGIS) --- softGIS --- parks planning --- Delta --- structured decision-making --- evidence --- wildlife --- management effectiveness --- grizzly bears --- decision-making --- evidence-informed policy --- Alberta Parks --- research --- n/a --- Iñupiat, Alaska
Choose an application
Parks and protected areas provide important services to nature and society. Park managers make difficult decisions to achieve their diverse mandates, and need current, relevant, and rigorous information. However, effective use of research provided by social scientists, natural scientists, local people, or Indigenous people is an ongoing challenge. Through case studies, this book examines knowledge mobilization in parks and protected areas, with a focus on successes and failures, barriers and enablers, diverse theoretical frameworks, and structural innovations. This book embraces the generation and use of knowledge, especially natural science, social science, local knowledge, and Indigenous knowledge, in relation to policy, planning, and management of parks and protected areas.
Research & information: general --- pastoral enclosures --- vernacular architecture --- minor rural buildings --- art of dry-stone walling --- indigenous and community conserved areas --- Galicia --- Cornwall --- forestry heritage --- heathland and grassland conservation --- plant biodiversity --- protected areas --- knowledge governance --- cross-scale management --- knowledge systems --- temporal dimensions --- time --- local tacit experiential knowledge --- participatory mapping --- conservation planning --- connectivity conservation --- wildlife movement pathways --- ecological corridors --- Yosemite National Park --- ethnographic databases --- ethnography --- National Park Service --- cultural resource management --- tribal co-management --- Southern Sierra Miwuk --- Mono Lake Paiute --- data sources --- Indigenous knowledge --- industrial development --- semi-aquatic mammals --- knowledge mobilization --- evidence-based decision making --- Indigenous Knowledge --- traditional knowledge --- traditional ecological knowledge --- subsistence, caribou --- Iñupiat, Alaska --- national parks --- co-management --- social science --- natural science --- local knowledge --- indigenous knowledge --- parks and protected areas management --- biosphere reserve --- co-design --- transdisciplinary practices --- public participation geographic information system (PPGIS) --- softGIS --- parks planning --- Delta --- structured decision-making --- evidence --- wildlife --- management effectiveness --- grizzly bears --- decision-making --- evidence-informed policy --- Alberta Parks --- research --- pastoral enclosures --- vernacular architecture --- minor rural buildings --- art of dry-stone walling --- indigenous and community conserved areas --- Galicia --- Cornwall --- forestry heritage --- heathland and grassland conservation --- plant biodiversity --- protected areas --- knowledge governance --- cross-scale management --- knowledge systems --- temporal dimensions --- time --- local tacit experiential knowledge --- participatory mapping --- conservation planning --- connectivity conservation --- wildlife movement pathways --- ecological corridors --- Yosemite National Park --- ethnographic databases --- ethnography --- National Park Service --- cultural resource management --- tribal co-management --- Southern Sierra Miwuk --- Mono Lake Paiute --- data sources --- Indigenous knowledge --- industrial development --- semi-aquatic mammals --- knowledge mobilization --- evidence-based decision making --- Indigenous Knowledge --- traditional knowledge --- traditional ecological knowledge --- subsistence, caribou --- Iñupiat, Alaska --- national parks --- co-management --- social science --- natural science --- local knowledge --- indigenous knowledge --- parks and protected areas management --- biosphere reserve --- co-design --- transdisciplinary practices --- public participation geographic information system (PPGIS) --- softGIS --- parks planning --- Delta --- structured decision-making --- evidence --- wildlife --- management effectiveness --- grizzly bears --- decision-making --- evidence-informed policy --- Alberta Parks --- research
Choose an application
An increasing number of people live in cities. In recent decades, this, combined with rural abandonment and landscape polarisation, has resulted in high land ownership concentrations and agricultural intensification. This, in turn, has resulted in a significant decrease in the resilience of agriculture and overall food systems and threatens the maintenance of traditional indigenous and peasant farming. Therefore, there is an urgent need to reconnect society with the sustainable use of agroecosystems by fostering resilient social–ecological systems, emphasising the links between the functioning of natural systems and human well-being, and stressing the benefits that people derive from them. This Special Issue aims to highlight impactful research and commentaries that focus on attempts to connect people with nature for the promotion of sustainable agricultural transitions. This Issue embraces inter- and trans-disciplinary studies from multiple disciplines (e.g., agricultural sciences, environmental sciences, geography, economy, and sociology), as well as those incorporating other knowledge systems (e.g., local and indigenous) in the co-construction of knowledge for sustainable agriculture, including studies in rural areas (e.g., GIAHS or HNV farmland) and initiatives that address urban–rural relationships or those developed within metropolitan areas (e.g., community-supported agriculture, food hubs, domestic gardens, multifunctional agriculture, and farmers´ or consumers´ cooperatives) and studies assessing the societal and ecological impacts of those initiatives.
Research & information: general --- community supported agriculture --- alternative food networks --- spatial proximity --- relational proximity --- cross-national case study --- sustainable agriculture --- rural-urban interaction --- agroecology --- youth --- human-nature connectedness --- sustainability transitions --- depopulation --- ecological agriculture --- water conservation --- double-hurdle model --- interpretative structural modeling --- adoptions --- threatened plant --- agriculture --- Spain --- land use --- conservation --- human-nature reconnection --- cultural landscapes --- drivers of change --- landscape planning --- landscape stewardship --- mixed methods --- participatory governance --- rural abandonment --- stakeholder inclusion --- urban growth --- participatory mapping --- ecosystem services --- demand --- PGIS --- agricultural landscapes --- human nature connectedness --- agricultural innovations --- multi-level perspective --- agricultural knowledge and innovation systems (AKIS) --- conservative agriculture practices --- knowledge co-production --- mediterranean horticulture --- integrated pest management --- greenhouses --- soil health --- biological control --- pond naturalisation --- collective action --- socio-ecological systems --- sustainable agricultural transition --- consumers/citizens --- sustainable consumption --- innovative business models --- alternative agri-food networks (AAFNs) --- human-nature connectedness (HNC) --- multi-level perspective (MLP) --- community-supported agriculture (CSA) --- cooperatives --- food systems governance --- public policy --- inclusive multilateralism --- rights-based approach --- biodiversity --- climate change --- nature --- foodshed archipelago --- proximity food supply chains --- spatial signature --- city-region --- food self-sufficiency --- regional food security --- agricultural diversification --- food planning --- regional food system --- food policy --- socioecological systems --- local identity --- world heritage site --- community supported agriculture --- alternative food networks --- spatial proximity --- relational proximity --- cross-national case study --- sustainable agriculture --- rural-urban interaction --- agroecology --- youth --- human-nature connectedness --- sustainability transitions --- depopulation --- ecological agriculture --- water conservation --- double-hurdle model --- interpretative structural modeling --- adoptions --- threatened plant --- agriculture --- Spain --- land use --- conservation --- human-nature reconnection --- cultural landscapes --- drivers of change --- landscape planning --- landscape stewardship --- mixed methods --- participatory governance --- rural abandonment --- stakeholder inclusion --- urban growth --- participatory mapping --- ecosystem services --- demand --- PGIS --- agricultural landscapes --- human nature connectedness --- agricultural innovations --- multi-level perspective --- agricultural knowledge and innovation systems (AKIS) --- conservative agriculture practices --- knowledge co-production --- mediterranean horticulture --- integrated pest management --- greenhouses --- soil health --- biological control --- pond naturalisation --- collective action --- socio-ecological systems --- sustainable agricultural transition --- consumers/citizens --- sustainable consumption --- innovative business models --- alternative agri-food networks (AAFNs) --- human-nature connectedness (HNC) --- multi-level perspective (MLP) --- community-supported agriculture (CSA) --- cooperatives --- food systems governance --- public policy --- inclusive multilateralism --- rights-based approach --- biodiversity --- climate change --- nature --- foodshed archipelago --- proximity food supply chains --- spatial signature --- city-region --- food self-sufficiency --- regional food security --- agricultural diversification --- food planning --- regional food system --- food policy --- socioecological systems --- local identity --- world heritage site
Choose an application
An increasing number of people live in cities. In recent decades, this, combined with rural abandonment and landscape polarisation, has resulted in high land ownership concentrations and agricultural intensification. This, in turn, has resulted in a significant decrease in the resilience of agriculture and overall food systems and threatens the maintenance of traditional indigenous and peasant farming. Therefore, there is an urgent need to reconnect society with the sustainable use of agroecosystems by fostering resilient social–ecological systems, emphasising the links between the functioning of natural systems and human well-being, and stressing the benefits that people derive from them. This Special Issue aims to highlight impactful research and commentaries that focus on attempts to connect people with nature for the promotion of sustainable agricultural transitions. This Issue embraces inter- and trans-disciplinary studies from multiple disciplines (e.g., agricultural sciences, environmental sciences, geography, economy, and sociology), as well as those incorporating other knowledge systems (e.g., local and indigenous) in the co-construction of knowledge for sustainable agriculture, including studies in rural areas (e.g., GIAHS or HNV farmland) and initiatives that address urban–rural relationships or those developed within metropolitan areas (e.g., community-supported agriculture, food hubs, domestic gardens, multifunctional agriculture, and farmers´ or consumers´ cooperatives) and studies assessing the societal and ecological impacts of those initiatives.
Research & information: general --- community supported agriculture --- alternative food networks --- spatial proximity --- relational proximity --- cross-national case study --- sustainable agriculture --- rural-urban interaction --- agroecology --- youth --- human-nature connectedness --- sustainability transitions --- depopulation --- ecological agriculture --- water conservation --- double-hurdle model --- interpretative structural modeling --- adoptions --- threatened plant --- agriculture --- Spain --- land use --- conservation --- human-nature reconnection --- cultural landscapes --- drivers of change --- landscape planning --- landscape stewardship --- mixed methods --- participatory governance --- rural abandonment --- stakeholder inclusion --- urban growth --- participatory mapping --- ecosystem services --- demand --- PGIS --- agricultural landscapes --- human nature connectedness --- agricultural innovations --- multi-level perspective --- agricultural knowledge and innovation systems (AKIS) --- conservative agriculture practices --- knowledge co-production --- mediterranean horticulture --- integrated pest management --- greenhouses --- soil health --- biological control --- pond naturalisation --- collective action --- socio-ecological systems --- sustainable agricultural transition --- consumers/citizens --- sustainable consumption --- innovative business models --- alternative agri-food networks (AAFNs) --- human–nature connectedness (HNC) --- multi-level perspective (MLP) --- community-supported agriculture (CSA) --- cooperatives --- food systems governance --- public policy --- inclusive multilateralism --- rights-based approach --- biodiversity --- climate change --- nature --- foodshed archipelago --- proximity food supply chains --- spatial signature --- city-region --- food self-sufficiency --- regional food security --- agricultural diversification --- food planning --- regional food system --- food policy --- socioecological systems --- local identity --- world heritage site --- n/a --- human-nature connectedness (HNC)
Choose an application
This Special Issue provides an insight, collated from 26 articles, focusing on various aspects of the Fit-For-Purpose Land Administration (FFPLA) concept and its application. It presents some influential and innovative trends and recommendations for designing, implementing, maintaining and further developing Fit-For-Purpose solutions for providing secure land rights at scale. The first group of 14 articles is published in Volume One and discusses various conceptual innovations related to spatial, legal and institutional aspects and its wider applications within land use management. The second group of 12 articles is published in Volume Two and focuses on case studies from various countries throughout the world, providing evidence and lessons learned from the FFPLA implementation process.
Research & information: general --- complete cadastre --- legal element --- fixing boundary --- eligible landowner --- agreement --- boundary marker --- fit-for-purpose land administration (FFP LA) --- violent conflict --- United Nations --- extra-legal --- transitional justice --- peace building --- land governance --- power relations --- securing land rights --- land registration --- development impacts --- fit-for-purpose land administration --- land administration --- decentralization --- India --- fit-for-purpose --- institutions --- governance --- politics --- Amazon --- deforestation --- Fit-For-Purpose land administration --- participatory mapping --- indigenous land conflict --- Cumaribo --- Colombia --- community-based land adjudication --- components of adjudication --- land tenure --- land rights --- good practices --- updating land records --- systematic land registration --- unconventional approach --- case study --- Benin --- cadaster --- land administration domain model --- LADM --- cadastre --- FFPLA --- customary tenure --- land inventory --- land management --- mobile-based applications --- pro-poor --- land surveying --- tenure security --- land rights and tenure --- fit-for-purpose approach --- human rights --- design science research --- design thinking --- fit for purpose --- spatial data quality --- spatial data quality assurance --- maintenance --- update --- upgrade --- upkeep --- renewal --- data quality --- spatial framework --- STDM --- technology --- UAV --- feature extraction --- rapid urbanization --- climate change --- pandemic --- urban resilience --- spatial --- legal --- and institutional frameworks --- land tenure security --- pro-poor land recordation --- land governance reform --- cost effectiveness --- innovative technology --- case studies --- Uganda --- customary land tenure --- land recordation tools --- semantic technologies --- land information system --- fit-for-purpose land management --- aerial and street level imagery --- machine learning --- integrated land programs --- land policy --- pilot study --- informal settlements --- urban development --- Brazil --- community-based crowdsourcing --- SiGIT --- Ecuador --- land and resources rights --- public-private partnerships --- corporate social responsibility --- poverty reduction --- business driven solutions --- social enterprises --- n/a
Listing 1 - 10 of 15 | << page >> |
Sort by
|