Listing 1 - 10 of 3813 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Du côté de Bruxelles : arrogance, désinvolture, volonté de subordonner les démocraties nationales à une démocratie européenne artificielle. Du côté des citoyens : indifférence, méfiance, sentiment de dépossession, voire d'illégitimité des processus européens. Voilà le terrible bilan : une "Europe sans les peuples", d'autant plus catastrophique que nous aurions vraiment besoin d'une coopération efficace et démocratique. Pour en sortir, il faut un électrochoc, un changement radical. L'actuel projet de Constitution européenne le laisse-t-il entrevoir ? Non, répond Georges Berthu, car il renforce les causes mêmes qui on produit "l'Europe sans les peuples". Après ses analyses des traités d'Amsterdam et de Nice, Georges Berthu fournit ici un commentaire détaillé du projet de Constitution européenne, qui montre ses failles, ses contradictions et ses dangers. Pour sortir d'un piège inextricable, il propose : "l'Europe avec les peuples". On ne peut qu'être frappé par l'obscurité des textes européens qui décourage les meilleures bonnes volontés, malgré l'importance des enjeux qu'ils représentent. Appuyé sur l'intégralité du texte du projet, cet ouvrage fait une analyse claire, dégageant l'essentiel, et permettant de comprendre la portée des ultimes marchandages à venir. Il constitue l'outil indispensable pour tous ceux qui voudront participer activement au débat sur la Constitution européenne
Constitutions --- Nation-state --- Nation
Choose an application
This timely Handbook examines the causes, costs and consequences of state fragility, advancing key debates in the field. Demonstrating the multidimensionality of fragility by applying diverse theories and methodologies, it provides new insights on effective policy development and application in the context of fragile states.
Choose an application
Nation-state. --- Nation
Choose an application
Nation-state. --- Nation
Choose an application
Nation-state. --- Nation
Choose an application
Choose an application
The U.S. experiences in Iraq and Afghanistan and the resulting U.S. military doctrine emphasize the need for the United States to consolidate the gains it has realized on the battlefield. Recognizing this need, however, is much easier than understanding the measures necessary to succeed. Both U.S. decisionmakers and a variety of analysts have generally agreed that broad-based, inclusive governance and institutionalized capacity-building consistent with the rule of law are the long-term goals for stabilizing fragile states. The conditions under which these goals are realistic and how to realize them are much more contentious. This report describes research intended to advance at least partial answers to these questions, including a framework to help better understand when we expect U.S. leverage to be successful in nudging partners toward better governance practices. While there is no panacea for the difficulties of stabilizing countries after conflicts, this research offers guidance on how the United States might improve the odds of securing such hard-won gains and evidence to suggest that — at least under the right circumstances — it can do so. An Executive Summary of this report is also available.
Choose an application
The U.S. experiences in Iraq and Afghanistan and the resulting U.S. military doctrine emphasize the need for the United States to consolidate the gains it has realized on the battlefield. Recognizing this need, however, is much easier than understanding the measures necessary to succeed. Both U.S. decisionmakers and a variety of analysts have generally agreed that broad-based, inclusive governance and institutionalized capacity-building consistent with the rule of law are the long-term goals for stabilizing fragile states. The conditions under which these goals are realistic and how to realize them are much more contentious. This report summarizes research intended to advance at least partial answers to these questions, including a framework to help better understand when we expect U.S. leverage to be successful in nudging partners toward better governance practices. While there is no panacea for the difficulties of stabilizing countries after conflicts, this research offers guidance on how the United States might improve the odds of securing such hard-won gains and evidence to suggest that — at least under the right circumstances — it can do so.
Choose an application
Listing 1 - 10 of 3813 | << page >> |
Sort by
|