Listing 1 - 7 of 7 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Project management --- Project management. --- Industrial project management --- organisational project management --- change management --- governance --- innovation --- project marketing --- maturity models --- Management --- Business management --- projectmanagement
Choose an application
We often cast a question whether unethical behavior (corporate irresponsible activities) undertaken by international firms in developing countries is really entirely unethical or simply unavoidable grease, which is necessary to facilitate short-term growth in overseas markets. Both strategic management and international business scholars have long attempted to examine the outcomes of corporate social responsibility (CSR) primarily in the organizational strategic aspect. Due to this, they are turning a blind eye to firms’ unethical attitude and pretending not to notice that it is happening. In other words, we do not yet know enough about CSR from a long-term perspective and its relationship with sustainable growth for the long-term. We should also acknowledge that a firm’s unethical management is both a primary cause and a result of poverty in our economy, which means that a firm’s irresponsible activities (as an antonym of CSR) cannot be justified by any reason. This also represents the importance of research exploring CSR. We believe that this is the time to, first, synthesize diverse research fragments on CSR, second, combine it with an additional unique agenda (e.g., human rights, win-win partnership, official development assistance) particularly in the sustainability domain, and then third, compile all the theoretical and empirical pieces for organizational sustainability. By inviting submissions from researchers who studies various theoretical perspectives, adopts varied empirical approaches, and examines at multiple levels of analysis, as well as qualitative and quantitative experiments, literature reviews, and meta-analyses, this SI draws a big picture. We are strongly convinced that papers accepted by this SI significantly contribute to current relevant debates by filling many extant research gaps.
Technology: general issues --- History of engineering & technology --- Fourth Industrial Revolution --- CSR authenticity --- digital transformation --- mediating effect --- China --- Korea --- corporate social responsibility --- construction sector --- strategy --- motives --- barriers --- effects --- CSR perception --- organizational commitment --- intrinsic motivation --- moderating effect --- task–technology fit theory --- green agri-food firm --- livestreaming e-commerce --- adoption --- firm performance --- strategic orientation --- digital capabilities --- new product development performance --- innovation --- CEO compensation structure --- social exchange --- equity --- strategic competitiveness --- MCF analysis --- internal control --- technological innovation --- mediated effect --- logistics service --- training service --- subjective norms --- self-efficiency sense --- elaboration likelihood model --- attitude --- word-of-mouth --- governance indicators --- information technology --- maturity models --- SME --- software --- sustainability indicators --- n/a --- task-technology fit theory
Choose an application
We often cast a question whether unethical behavior (corporate irresponsible activities) undertaken by international firms in developing countries is really entirely unethical or simply unavoidable grease, which is necessary to facilitate short-term growth in overseas markets. Both strategic management and international business scholars have long attempted to examine the outcomes of corporate social responsibility (CSR) primarily in the organizational strategic aspect. Due to this, they are turning a blind eye to firms’ unethical attitude and pretending not to notice that it is happening. In other words, we do not yet know enough about CSR from a long-term perspective and its relationship with sustainable growth for the long-term. We should also acknowledge that a firm’s unethical management is both a primary cause and a result of poverty in our economy, which means that a firm’s irresponsible activities (as an antonym of CSR) cannot be justified by any reason. This also represents the importance of research exploring CSR. We believe that this is the time to, first, synthesize diverse research fragments on CSR, second, combine it with an additional unique agenda (e.g., human rights, win-win partnership, official development assistance) particularly in the sustainability domain, and then third, compile all the theoretical and empirical pieces for organizational sustainability. By inviting submissions from researchers who studies various theoretical perspectives, adopts varied empirical approaches, and examines at multiple levels of analysis, as well as qualitative and quantitative experiments, literature reviews, and meta-analyses, this SI draws a big picture. We are strongly convinced that papers accepted by this SI significantly contribute to current relevant debates by filling many extant research gaps.
Fourth Industrial Revolution --- CSR authenticity --- digital transformation --- mediating effect --- China --- Korea --- corporate social responsibility --- construction sector --- strategy --- motives --- barriers --- effects --- CSR perception --- organizational commitment --- intrinsic motivation --- moderating effect --- task–technology fit theory --- green agri-food firm --- livestreaming e-commerce --- adoption --- firm performance --- strategic orientation --- digital capabilities --- new product development performance --- innovation --- CEO compensation structure --- social exchange --- equity --- strategic competitiveness --- MCF analysis --- internal control --- technological innovation --- mediated effect --- logistics service --- training service --- subjective norms --- self-efficiency sense --- elaboration likelihood model --- attitude --- word-of-mouth --- governance indicators --- information technology --- maturity models --- SME --- software --- sustainability indicators --- n/a --- task-technology fit theory
Choose an application
We often cast a question whether unethical behavior (corporate irresponsible activities) undertaken by international firms in developing countries is really entirely unethical or simply unavoidable grease, which is necessary to facilitate short-term growth in overseas markets. Both strategic management and international business scholars have long attempted to examine the outcomes of corporate social responsibility (CSR) primarily in the organizational strategic aspect. Due to this, they are turning a blind eye to firms’ unethical attitude and pretending not to notice that it is happening. In other words, we do not yet know enough about CSR from a long-term perspective and its relationship with sustainable growth for the long-term. We should also acknowledge that a firm’s unethical management is both a primary cause and a result of poverty in our economy, which means that a firm’s irresponsible activities (as an antonym of CSR) cannot be justified by any reason. This also represents the importance of research exploring CSR. We believe that this is the time to, first, synthesize diverse research fragments on CSR, second, combine it with an additional unique agenda (e.g., human rights, win-win partnership, official development assistance) particularly in the sustainability domain, and then third, compile all the theoretical and empirical pieces for organizational sustainability. By inviting submissions from researchers who studies various theoretical perspectives, adopts varied empirical approaches, and examines at multiple levels of analysis, as well as qualitative and quantitative experiments, literature reviews, and meta-analyses, this SI draws a big picture. We are strongly convinced that papers accepted by this SI significantly contribute to current relevant debates by filling many extant research gaps.
Technology: general issues --- History of engineering & technology --- Fourth Industrial Revolution --- CSR authenticity --- digital transformation --- mediating effect --- China --- Korea --- corporate social responsibility --- construction sector --- strategy --- motives --- barriers --- effects --- CSR perception --- organizational commitment --- intrinsic motivation --- moderating effect --- task-technology fit theory --- green agri-food firm --- livestreaming e-commerce --- adoption --- firm performance --- strategic orientation --- digital capabilities --- new product development performance --- innovation --- CEO compensation structure --- social exchange --- equity --- strategic competitiveness --- MCF analysis --- internal control --- technological innovation --- mediated effect --- logistics service --- training service --- subjective norms --- self-efficiency sense --- elaboration likelihood model --- attitude --- word-of-mouth --- governance indicators --- information technology --- maturity models --- SME --- software --- sustainability indicators --- Fourth Industrial Revolution --- CSR authenticity --- digital transformation --- mediating effect --- China --- Korea --- corporate social responsibility --- construction sector --- strategy --- motives --- barriers --- effects --- CSR perception --- organizational commitment --- intrinsic motivation --- moderating effect --- task-technology fit theory --- green agri-food firm --- livestreaming e-commerce --- adoption --- firm performance --- strategic orientation --- digital capabilities --- new product development performance --- innovation --- CEO compensation structure --- social exchange --- equity --- strategic competitiveness --- MCF analysis --- internal control --- technological innovation --- mediated effect --- logistics service --- training service --- subjective norms --- self-efficiency sense --- elaboration likelihood model --- attitude --- word-of-mouth --- governance indicators --- information technology --- maturity models --- SME --- software --- sustainability indicators
Choose an application
This Systems Thinking Special Issue contains 12 papers on the nature of systems thinking as it applies to systems engineering, systems science, system dynamics, and related fields. Systems thinking can be broadly considered the activity of thinking applied in a systems context, forming a basis for fundamental approaches to several systems disciplines, including systems engineering, systems science, and system dynamics. Although these are somewhat distinct fields, they are bound by common approaches in regard to systems. Whereas systems engineering seeks to apply a multidisciplinary, holistic approach to the development of systems, systems science seeks to understand the basics related to systems of all kinds, from natural to man-made, and system dynamics seeks to understand system structures in order to influence its dynamics. Man-made systems have become more ubiquitous and complex. The study of systems, both natural and engineered, presents new challenges and opportunities to understand emergent, dynamic behaviors that inform the process of sense-making based on systems thinking.
History of engineering & technology --- systems philosophy --- heuristic systems principles --- scientific systems principles --- general systems principles --- specialized systems principles --- general systems theory --- GST --- sustainability --- systems thinking --- UN sustainable development goals --- mental models --- neoliberalism --- ecological economics --- isomorphic systems processes (ISPs) --- Monterey Phoenix (MP) --- behavior modeling --- emergent behavior --- cycles and cycling --- systems processes theory (SPT) --- family --- family system --- natural systems thinking --- Murray Bowen --- integrative theory --- competence --- maturity models --- worldview --- Worldview Inquiry Framework --- General Inquiry Framework --- system thinking --- systems approach --- capacity for systems thinking --- Myers Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) personality type test --- concept map --- termbase --- systems perspective --- ontology of systems --- frontier research --- shadow IT --- IT integration --- IT integration drawbacks --- application integration --- path dependency --- path biography --- switching costs --- education for sustainable development --- teacher education --- systems education --- soft systems methodology (SSM) --- bibliometrics --- academic impact of SSM --- data visualization --- systems engineering --- healthcare system design --- clinical models --- socio-technical system --- model-based systems engineering
Choose an application
This Systems Thinking Special Issue contains 12 papers on the nature of systems thinking as it applies to systems engineering, systems science, system dynamics, and related fields. Systems thinking can be broadly considered the activity of thinking applied in a systems context, forming a basis for fundamental approaches to several systems disciplines, including systems engineering, systems science, and system dynamics. Although these are somewhat distinct fields, they are bound by common approaches in regard to systems. Whereas systems engineering seeks to apply a multidisciplinary, holistic approach to the development of systems, systems science seeks to understand the basics related to systems of all kinds, from natural to man-made, and system dynamics seeks to understand system structures in order to influence its dynamics. Man-made systems have become more ubiquitous and complex. The study of systems, both natural and engineered, presents new challenges and opportunities to understand emergent, dynamic behaviors that inform the process of sense-making based on systems thinking.
systems philosophy --- heuristic systems principles --- scientific systems principles --- general systems principles --- specialized systems principles --- general systems theory --- GST --- sustainability --- systems thinking --- UN sustainable development goals --- mental models --- neoliberalism --- ecological economics --- isomorphic systems processes (ISPs) --- Monterey Phoenix (MP) --- behavior modeling --- emergent behavior --- cycles and cycling --- systems processes theory (SPT) --- family --- family system --- natural systems thinking --- Murray Bowen --- integrative theory --- competence --- maturity models --- worldview --- Worldview Inquiry Framework --- General Inquiry Framework --- system thinking --- systems approach --- capacity for systems thinking --- Myers Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) personality type test --- concept map --- termbase --- systems perspective --- ontology of systems --- frontier research --- shadow IT --- IT integration --- IT integration drawbacks --- application integration --- path dependency --- path biography --- switching costs --- education for sustainable development --- teacher education --- systems education --- soft systems methodology (SSM) --- bibliometrics --- academic impact of SSM --- data visualization --- systems engineering --- healthcare system design --- clinical models --- socio-technical system --- model-based systems engineering
Choose an application
This Systems Thinking Special Issue contains 12 papers on the nature of systems thinking as it applies to systems engineering, systems science, system dynamics, and related fields. Systems thinking can be broadly considered the activity of thinking applied in a systems context, forming a basis for fundamental approaches to several systems disciplines, including systems engineering, systems science, and system dynamics. Although these are somewhat distinct fields, they are bound by common approaches in regard to systems. Whereas systems engineering seeks to apply a multidisciplinary, holistic approach to the development of systems, systems science seeks to understand the basics related to systems of all kinds, from natural to man-made, and system dynamics seeks to understand system structures in order to influence its dynamics. Man-made systems have become more ubiquitous and complex. The study of systems, both natural and engineered, presents new challenges and opportunities to understand emergent, dynamic behaviors that inform the process of sense-making based on systems thinking.
History of engineering & technology --- systems philosophy --- heuristic systems principles --- scientific systems principles --- general systems principles --- specialized systems principles --- general systems theory --- GST --- sustainability --- systems thinking --- UN sustainable development goals --- mental models --- neoliberalism --- ecological economics --- isomorphic systems processes (ISPs) --- Monterey Phoenix (MP) --- behavior modeling --- emergent behavior --- cycles and cycling --- systems processes theory (SPT) --- family --- family system --- natural systems thinking --- Murray Bowen --- integrative theory --- competence --- maturity models --- worldview --- Worldview Inquiry Framework --- General Inquiry Framework --- system thinking --- systems approach --- capacity for systems thinking --- Myers Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) personality type test --- concept map --- termbase --- systems perspective --- ontology of systems --- frontier research --- shadow IT --- IT integration --- IT integration drawbacks --- application integration --- path dependency --- path biography --- switching costs --- education for sustainable development --- teacher education --- systems education --- soft systems methodology (SSM) --- bibliometrics --- academic impact of SSM --- data visualization --- systems engineering --- healthcare system design --- clinical models --- socio-technical system --- model-based systems engineering --- systems philosophy --- heuristic systems principles --- scientific systems principles --- general systems principles --- specialized systems principles --- general systems theory --- GST --- sustainability --- systems thinking --- UN sustainable development goals --- mental models --- neoliberalism --- ecological economics --- isomorphic systems processes (ISPs) --- Monterey Phoenix (MP) --- behavior modeling --- emergent behavior --- cycles and cycling --- systems processes theory (SPT) --- family --- family system --- natural systems thinking --- Murray Bowen --- integrative theory --- competence --- maturity models --- worldview --- Worldview Inquiry Framework --- General Inquiry Framework --- system thinking --- systems approach --- capacity for systems thinking --- Myers Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) personality type test --- concept map --- termbase --- systems perspective --- ontology of systems --- frontier research --- shadow IT --- IT integration --- IT integration drawbacks --- application integration --- path dependency --- path biography --- switching costs --- education for sustainable development --- teacher education --- systems education --- soft systems methodology (SSM) --- bibliometrics --- academic impact of SSM --- data visualization --- systems engineering --- healthcare system design --- clinical models --- socio-technical system --- model-based systems engineering
Listing 1 - 7 of 7 |
Sort by
|