Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Advancements in digital technologies are reshaping the world of dentistry, from prosthodontics to implant dentistry. Intraoral scanners, facial scanners, 3D printers, and milling machines have revolutionized the clinical approach and operative workflow in daily practice. However, digital dentistry brings several challenges to clinicians due to the rapid evolution of new technologies and the lack of evidence-based guidelines for their correct use. The aim of this Special Issue is to cover the latest advances in the development and application of digital technologies in prosthetic and implant dentistry. We wish to provide both clinicians and researchers with a comprehensive and up-to-date source of information on current trends, limitations, and potential future applications of digital technologies in daily clinical practice.
Medicine --- dental implants --- digital impression --- intraoral scanner --- CAD/CAM materials --- toothbrushing wear --- surface --- roughness --- surface integrity --- alveolar remodeling --- tooth extraction --- intraoral digital scanning --- imaging superimposition --- less traumatic surgery --- socket healing --- implantology --- computer-aided surgery --- image-guided surgery --- zygomatic implants --- navigation system --- dental implant --- bone level --- prospective study --- sub-crestal placement --- emergence profile --- guided surgery --- digital workflow --- stereolithographic surgical guide --- accuracy --- CAD–CAM --- DICOM–STL --- static guided surgery --- clinical study --- intraoral scanners --- digital dentistry --- impression techniques --- full-arch impression --- elderly population --- dimensional measurement accuracy --- implant scan --- operator --- precision --- scan area --- trueness --- occlusion --- overloading --- complications --- implant-supported restorations --- marginal bone loss --- oral implantology --- intraoral scan --- cone-beam computed tomography --- oral surgery --- emergence angle --- retrospective study
Choose an application
In the past, osseointegration was regarded to be a mode of implant anchorage that simulated a simple wound healing phenomenon. Today, we have evidence that osseointegration is, in fact, a foreign body reaction that involves an immunologically derived bony demarcation of an implant to shield it off from the tissues. Marginal bone resorption around an oral implant cannot be properly understood without realizing the foreign body nature of the implant itself. Whereas the immunological response as such is positive for implant longevity, adverse immunological reactions may cause marginal bone loss in combination with combined factors. Combined factors include the hardware, clinical handling as well as patient characteristics that, even if each one of these factors only produce subliminal trauma, when acting together they may result in loss of marginal bone. The role of bacteria in the process of marginal bone loss is smaller than previously believed due to combined defense mechanisms of inflammation and immunological reactions, but if the defense is failing we may see bacterially induced marginal bone loss as well. However, problems with loss of marginal bone threatening implant survival remains relatively uncommon; we have today 10 years of clinical documentation of five different types of implant displaying a failure rate in the range of only 1 to 4 %.
Medicine --- osseointegration --- dental implant --- peri-implantitis --- ligature-induced peri-implantitis --- aseptic loosening --- systematic review --- immune system --- biomaterials --- foreign body reaction --- in vivo study --- oral implants --- marginal bone loss --- immunomodulation --- mechanotransduction --- Crestal bone loss --- osseosufficiency --- osseoseparation --- photoacoustic ultrasound --- brain–bone axis --- overloading --- radiography --- CBCT (cone beam computerized tomography) --- osteogenesis --- osteotomy --- bone healing --- bone chips --- drilling tool design --- fused deposition modeling --- polyether ether ketone --- biocomposite --- orthopedic implant --- oral implant --- mechanical properties --- wettability --- topography --- biocompatibility --- cell adhesion --- peri-implant endosseous healing --- dental implantation --- alveolar bone loss --- alveolar bone remodeling/regeneration --- bone biology --- finite element analysis (FEA) --- biomechanics --- cell plasticity --- dental implants --- electron microscopy --- scanning transmission electron microscopy --- bone-implant interface --- bone loss --- overdenture --- implant survival --- implant surface --- soft tissue --- split-mouth design --- oral health-related quality of life --- patient-reported outcome measures --- biomaterial --- bone --- immune --- implant --- healing --- titanium --- PEEK --- Cu --- micro-RNA --- microarray --- predictive biomarker --- epigenomics --- mucositis --- diagnosis --- over-treatment --- iatrogenic damage --- abutment height --- subcrestal implants --- implant insertion depth --- vertical mucosal thickness --- biological width --- implant installation --- anchorage technique --- histology --- intraosseous temperature --- finite element model --- ligature induced peri-implantitis --- arthroplasty --- replacement --- hip --- hypersensitivity --- contact --- allergy and immunology --- cytokines --- Interleukin-8 --- surface properties --- materials testing --- implant contamination --- scanning electron microscopy --- energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry --- convergence --- clinical study --- biofilm --- infection --- perio-prosthetic joint infection --- periimplantitis --- electrolytic cleaning --- n/a --- zirconia --- insertion --- bone–implant interface --- heat --- bone damage --- early loss --- augmentation --- air flow --- re-osseointegration --- classification of bone defects --- dog study --- brain-bone axis
Choose an application
In the past, osseointegration was regarded to be a mode of implant anchorage that simulated a simple wound healing phenomenon. Today, we have evidence that osseointegration is, in fact, a foreign body reaction that involves an immunologically derived bony demarcation of an implant to shield it off from the tissues. Marginal bone resorption around an oral implant cannot be properly understood without realizing the foreign body nature of the implant itself. Whereas the immunological response as such is positive for implant longevity, adverse immunological reactions may cause marginal bone loss in combination with combined factors. Combined factors include the hardware, clinical handling as well as patient characteristics that, even if each one of these factors only produce subliminal trauma, when acting together they may result in loss of marginal bone. The role of bacteria in the process of marginal bone loss is smaller than previously believed due to combined defense mechanisms of inflammation and immunological reactions, but if the defense is failing we may see bacterially induced marginal bone loss as well. However, problems with loss of marginal bone threatening implant survival remains relatively uncommon; we have today 10 years of clinical documentation of five different types of implant displaying a failure rate in the range of only 1 to 4 %.
osseointegration --- dental implant --- peri-implantitis --- ligature-induced peri-implantitis --- aseptic loosening --- systematic review --- immune system --- biomaterials --- foreign body reaction --- in vivo study --- oral implants --- marginal bone loss --- immunomodulation --- mechanotransduction --- Crestal bone loss --- osseosufficiency --- osseoseparation --- photoacoustic ultrasound --- brain–bone axis --- overloading --- radiography --- CBCT (cone beam computerized tomography) --- osteogenesis --- osteotomy --- bone healing --- bone chips --- drilling tool design --- fused deposition modeling --- polyether ether ketone --- biocomposite --- orthopedic implant --- oral implant --- mechanical properties --- wettability --- topography --- biocompatibility --- cell adhesion --- peri-implant endosseous healing --- dental implantation --- alveolar bone loss --- alveolar bone remodeling/regeneration --- bone biology --- finite element analysis (FEA) --- biomechanics --- cell plasticity --- dental implants --- electron microscopy --- scanning transmission electron microscopy --- bone-implant interface --- bone loss --- overdenture --- implant survival --- implant surface --- soft tissue --- split-mouth design --- oral health-related quality of life --- patient-reported outcome measures --- biomaterial --- bone --- immune --- implant --- healing --- titanium --- PEEK --- Cu --- micro-RNA --- microarray --- predictive biomarker --- epigenomics --- mucositis --- diagnosis --- over-treatment --- iatrogenic damage --- abutment height --- subcrestal implants --- implant insertion depth --- vertical mucosal thickness --- biological width --- implant installation --- anchorage technique --- histology --- intraosseous temperature --- finite element model --- ligature induced peri-implantitis --- arthroplasty --- replacement --- hip --- hypersensitivity --- contact --- allergy and immunology --- cytokines --- Interleukin-8 --- surface properties --- materials testing --- implant contamination --- scanning electron microscopy --- energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry --- convergence --- clinical study --- biofilm --- infection --- perio-prosthetic joint infection --- periimplantitis --- electrolytic cleaning --- n/a --- zirconia --- insertion --- bone–implant interface --- heat --- bone damage --- early loss --- augmentation --- air flow --- re-osseointegration --- classification of bone defects --- dog study --- brain-bone axis
Choose an application
In the past, osseointegration was regarded to be a mode of implant anchorage that simulated a simple wound healing phenomenon. Today, we have evidence that osseointegration is, in fact, a foreign body reaction that involves an immunologically derived bony demarcation of an implant to shield it off from the tissues. Marginal bone resorption around an oral implant cannot be properly understood without realizing the foreign body nature of the implant itself. Whereas the immunological response as such is positive for implant longevity, adverse immunological reactions may cause marginal bone loss in combination with combined factors. Combined factors include the hardware, clinical handling as well as patient characteristics that, even if each one of these factors only produce subliminal trauma, when acting together they may result in loss of marginal bone. The role of bacteria in the process of marginal bone loss is smaller than previously believed due to combined defense mechanisms of inflammation and immunological reactions, but if the defense is failing we may see bacterially induced marginal bone loss as well. However, problems with loss of marginal bone threatening implant survival remains relatively uncommon; we have today 10 years of clinical documentation of five different types of implant displaying a failure rate in the range of only 1 to 4 %.
Medicine --- osseointegration --- dental implant --- peri-implantitis --- ligature-induced peri-implantitis --- aseptic loosening --- systematic review --- immune system --- biomaterials --- foreign body reaction --- in vivo study --- oral implants --- marginal bone loss --- immunomodulation --- mechanotransduction --- Crestal bone loss --- osseosufficiency --- osseoseparation --- photoacoustic ultrasound --- brain-bone axis --- overloading --- radiography --- CBCT (cone beam computerized tomography) --- osteogenesis --- osteotomy --- bone healing --- bone chips --- drilling tool design --- fused deposition modeling --- polyether ether ketone --- biocomposite --- orthopedic implant --- oral implant --- mechanical properties --- wettability --- topography --- biocompatibility --- cell adhesion --- peri-implant endosseous healing --- dental implantation --- alveolar bone loss --- alveolar bone remodeling/regeneration --- bone biology --- finite element analysis (FEA) --- biomechanics --- cell plasticity --- dental implants --- electron microscopy --- scanning transmission electron microscopy --- bone-implant interface --- bone loss --- overdenture --- implant survival --- implant surface --- soft tissue --- split-mouth design --- oral health-related quality of life --- patient-reported outcome measures --- biomaterial --- bone --- immune --- implant --- healing --- titanium --- PEEK --- Cu --- micro-RNA --- microarray --- predictive biomarker --- epigenomics --- mucositis --- diagnosis --- over-treatment --- iatrogenic damage --- abutment height --- subcrestal implants --- implant insertion depth --- vertical mucosal thickness --- biological width --- implant installation --- anchorage technique --- histology --- intraosseous temperature --- finite element model --- ligature induced peri-implantitis --- arthroplasty --- replacement --- hip --- hypersensitivity --- contact --- allergy and immunology --- cytokines --- Interleukin-8 --- surface properties --- materials testing --- implant contamination --- scanning electron microscopy --- energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry --- convergence --- clinical study --- biofilm --- infection --- perio-prosthetic joint infection --- periimplantitis --- electrolytic cleaning --- zirconia --- insertion --- bone-implant interface --- heat --- bone damage --- early loss --- augmentation --- air flow --- re-osseointegration --- classification of bone defects --- dog study --- osseointegration --- dental implant --- peri-implantitis --- ligature-induced peri-implantitis --- aseptic loosening --- systematic review --- immune system --- biomaterials --- foreign body reaction --- in vivo study --- oral implants --- marginal bone loss --- immunomodulation --- mechanotransduction --- Crestal bone loss --- osseosufficiency --- osseoseparation --- photoacoustic ultrasound --- brain-bone axis --- overloading --- radiography --- CBCT (cone beam computerized tomography) --- osteogenesis --- osteotomy --- bone healing --- bone chips --- drilling tool design --- fused deposition modeling --- polyether ether ketone --- biocomposite --- orthopedic implant --- oral implant --- mechanical properties --- wettability --- topography --- biocompatibility --- cell adhesion --- peri-implant endosseous healing --- dental implantation --- alveolar bone loss --- alveolar bone remodeling/regeneration --- bone biology --- finite element analysis (FEA) --- biomechanics --- cell plasticity --- dental implants --- electron microscopy --- scanning transmission electron microscopy --- bone-implant interface --- bone loss --- overdenture --- implant survival --- implant surface --- soft tissue --- split-mouth design --- oral health-related quality of life --- patient-reported outcome measures --- biomaterial --- bone --- immune --- implant --- healing --- titanium --- PEEK --- Cu --- micro-RNA --- microarray --- predictive biomarker --- epigenomics --- mucositis --- diagnosis --- over-treatment --- iatrogenic damage --- abutment height --- subcrestal implants --- implant insertion depth --- vertical mucosal thickness --- biological width --- implant installation --- anchorage technique --- histology --- intraosseous temperature --- finite element model --- ligature induced peri-implantitis --- arthroplasty --- replacement --- hip --- hypersensitivity --- contact --- allergy and immunology --- cytokines --- Interleukin-8 --- surface properties --- materials testing --- implant contamination --- scanning electron microscopy --- energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry --- convergence --- clinical study --- biofilm --- infection --- perio-prosthetic joint infection --- periimplantitis --- electrolytic cleaning --- zirconia --- insertion --- bone-implant interface --- heat --- bone damage --- early loss --- augmentation --- air flow --- re-osseointegration --- classification of bone defects --- dog study
Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|