Listing 1 - 10 of 455 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Choose an application
Universal human rights standards were adopted in 1948, but in the 1970s and 1980s, violent dictatorships in Argentina and Chile flagrantly defied the new protocols. Chilean general Augusto Pinochet and the Argentine military employed state terrorism in their quest to eradicate Marxism and other forms of “subversion.” Pinochet constructed an iron shield of impunity for himself and the military in Chile, while in Argentina, military pressure resulted in laws preventing prosecution for past human rights violations. When democracy was reestablished in both countries by 1990, justice for crimes against humanity seemed beyond reach. Thomas C. Wright examines how persistent advocacy by domestic and international human rights groups, evolving legal environments, unanticipated events that impacted public opinion, and eventual changes in military leadership led to a situation unique in the world—the stripping of impunity not only from a select number of commanders of the repression but from all those involved in state terrorism in Chile and Argentina. This has resulted in trials conducted by national courts, without United Nations or executive branch direction, in which hundreds of former repressors have been convicted and many more are indicted or undergoing trial. Impunity, Human Rights, and Democracy draws on extensive research, including interviews, to trace the erosion and collapse of the former repressors’ impunity—a triumph for human rights advocates that has begun to inspire authorities in other Latin American countries, including Peru, Uruguay, Brazil, and Guatemala, to investigate past human rights violations and prosecute their perpetrators.
Impunity --- Human rights --- Democracy
Choose an application
Universal human rights standards were adopted in 1948, but in the 1970s and 1980s, violent dictatorships in Argentina and Chile flagrantly defied the new protocols. Chilean general Augusto Pinochet and the Argentine military employed state terrorism in their quest to eradicate Marxism and other forms of “subversion.” Pinochet constructed an iron shield of impunity for himself and the military in Chile, while in Argentina, military pressure resulted in laws preventing prosecution for past human rights violations. When democracy was reestablished in both countries by 1990, justice for crimes against humanity seemed beyond reach. Thomas C. Wright examines how persistent advocacy by domestic and international human rights groups, evolving legal environments, unanticipated events that impacted public opinion, and eventual changes in military leadership led to a situation unique in the world—the stripping of impunity not only from a select number of commanders of the repression but from all those involved in state terrorism in Chile and Argentina. This has resulted in trials conducted by national courts, without United Nations or executive branch direction, in which hundreds of former repressors have been convicted and many more are indicted or undergoing trial. Impunity, Human Rights, and Democracy draws on extensive research, including interviews, to trace the erosion and collapse of the former repressors’ impunity—a triumph for human rights advocates that has begun to inspire authorities in other Latin American countries, including Peru, Uruguay, Brazil, and Guatemala, to investigate past human rights violations and prosecute their perpetrators.
Impunity --- Human rights --- Democracy
Choose an application
Violence against women --- Impunity --- Women --- Women
Choose an application
"JGRO focuses on human rights as they are practiced and applied in various regional courts around the globe, including the International Criminal Court, Inter-American Court and Commission of Human Rights, European Court and Commission of Human Rights, and African Court and Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights"--Page i
Choose an application
"JGRO focuses on human rights as they are practiced and applied in various regional courts around the globe, including the International Criminal Court, Inter-American Court and Commission of Human Rights, European Court and Commission of Human Rights, and African Court and Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights"--Page i
Choose an application
"JGRO focuses on human rights as they are practiced and applied in various regional courts around the globe, including the International Criminal Court, Inter-American Court and Commission of Human Rights, European Court and Commission of Human Rights, and African Court and Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights"--Page i
Choose an application
"Fragile Memory, Shifting Impunity is an interdisciplinary study of commemorative sites related to human rights violations committed primarily during dictatorial rule in Argentina (1976-1983) and Uruguay (1973-1985). Taking as a departure point the 'politics of memory'--a term that acknowledges memory's propensity for engagement beyond the cultural sphere--this study shifts the focus away from the exclusively aesthetic and architectural readings of marches, memorials and monuments to instead analyse their emergence and transformation in post-dictatorial Argentina and Uruguay. This book incorporates the role of state and societal actors and conflicts underpinning commemorative processes into its analysis, reading the sites within shifting contexts of impunity to explore their relationship to memory, truth seeking and justice in the long aftermath of dictatorship"--Provided by publisher.
Memory --- Memory --- Impunity --- Impunity --- Memorials --- Memorials --- Human rights --- Human rights --- Argentina --- Uruguay
Choose an application
Punishment --- Peines --- Penalties (Criminal law) --- Penology --- Corrections --- Impunity --- Retribution
Choose an application
Punishment. --- Peines --- Punishment --- Penalties (Criminal law) --- Penology --- Corrections --- Impunity --- Retribution
Listing 1 - 10 of 455 | << page >> |
Sort by
|