Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This book aims to perform an impartial analysis to evaluate the implications of the environmental costs and impacts of a wide range of technologies and energy strategies. This information is intended to be used to support decision-making by groups, including researchers, industry, regulators, and policy-makers. Life cycle assessment (LCA) and technoeconomic analysis can be applied to a wide variety of technologies and energy strategies, both established and emerging. LCA is a method used to evaluate the possible environmental impacts of a product, material, process, or activity. It assesses the environmental impact throughout the life cycle of a system, from the acquisition of materials to the manufacture, use, and final disposal of a product. Technoeconomic analysis refers to cost evaluations, including production cost and life cycle cost. Often, in order to carry out technoeconomic analysis, researchers are required to obtain data on the performance of new technologies that operate on a very small scale in order to subsequently design configurations on a commercial scale and estimate the costs of such expansions. The results of the developed models help identify possible market applications and provide an estimate of long-term impacts. These methods, together with other forms of decision analysis, are very useful in the development and improvement of energy objectives, since they will serve to compare different decisions, evaluating their political and economic feasibility and providing guidance on potential financial and technological risks.

History of engineering & technology --- ocean energy --- tidal energy converters --- offshore renewable energy --- life-cycle costs --- installation and maintenance maneuvers --- economic-financial viability --- ancillary ventilation --- effective zone --- CFDs --- mixture model --- building --- environmental costs --- green GDP, China --- uncertainty analysis --- sensitivity analysis --- thermal mass --- thermal inertia --- radiant cooling system --- energy conservation --- energy simulation --- energy modeling --- bottom-up models --- building archetype simulation --- unit energy consumption --- end-use forecasting --- diffusion rate --- street lighting system --- TCO --- EVR --- EVC --- eco-efficient value creation --- eco-costs --- bibliometrics --- review --- life cycle assessment (LCA) --- allocation --- system expansion --- end of life of PV --- cost of PV recycling --- photovoltaic waste --- FRELP --- electricity scenarios --- life cycle assessment --- Italian electricity --- environmental impacts --- grid mix --- California --- energy transition --- net energy analysis --- EROI --- photovoltaic --- energy storage --- lithium-ion battery --- hourly data --- ocean energy --- tidal energy converters --- offshore renewable energy --- life-cycle costs --- installation and maintenance maneuvers --- economic-financial viability --- ancillary ventilation --- effective zone --- CFDs --- mixture model --- building --- environmental costs --- green GDP, China --- uncertainty analysis --- sensitivity analysis --- thermal mass --- thermal inertia --- radiant cooling system --- energy conservation --- energy simulation --- energy modeling --- bottom-up models --- building archetype simulation --- unit energy consumption --- end-use forecasting --- diffusion rate --- street lighting system --- TCO --- EVR --- EVC --- eco-efficient value creation --- eco-costs --- bibliometrics --- review --- life cycle assessment (LCA) --- allocation --- system expansion --- end of life of PV --- cost of PV recycling --- photovoltaic waste --- FRELP --- electricity scenarios --- life cycle assessment --- Italian electricity --- environmental impacts --- grid mix --- California --- energy transition --- net energy analysis --- EROI --- photovoltaic --- energy storage --- lithium-ion battery --- hourly data

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This book aims to perform an impartial analysis to evaluate the implications of the environmental costs and impacts of a wide range of technologies and energy strategies. This information is intended to be used to support decision-making by groups, including researchers, industry, regulators, and policy-makers. Life cycle assessment (LCA) and technoeconomic analysis can be applied to a wide variety of technologies and energy strategies, both established and emerging. LCA is a method used to evaluate the possible environmental impacts of a product, material, process, or activity. It assesses the environmental impact throughout the life cycle of a system, from the acquisition of materials to the manufacture, use, and final disposal of a product. Technoeconomic analysis refers to cost evaluations, including production cost and life cycle cost. Often, in order to carry out technoeconomic analysis, researchers are required to obtain data on the performance of new technologies that operate on a very small scale in order to subsequently design configurations on a commercial scale and estimate the costs of such expansions. The results of the developed models help identify possible market applications and provide an estimate of long-term impacts. These methods, together with other forms of decision analysis, are very useful in the development and improvement of energy objectives, since they will serve to compare different decisions, evaluating their political and economic feasibility and providing guidance on potential financial and technological risks.

History of engineering & technology --- ocean energy --- tidal energy converters --- offshore renewable energy --- life-cycle costs --- installation and maintenance maneuvers --- economic-financial viability --- ancillary ventilation --- effective zone --- CFDs --- mixture model --- building --- environmental costs --- green GDP, China --- uncertainty analysis --- sensitivity analysis --- thermal mass --- thermal inertia --- radiant cooling system --- energy conservation --- energy simulation --- energy modeling --- bottom-up models --- building archetype simulation --- unit energy consumption --- end-use forecasting --- diffusion rate --- street lighting system --- TCO --- EVR --- EVC --- eco-efficient value creation --- eco-costs --- bibliometrics --- review --- life cycle assessment (LCA) --- allocation --- system expansion --- end of life of PV --- cost of PV recycling --- photovoltaic waste --- FRELP --- electricity scenarios --- life cycle assessment --- Italian electricity --- environmental impacts --- grid mix --- California --- energy transition --- net energy analysis --- EROI --- photovoltaic --- energy storage --- lithium-ion battery --- hourly data

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Higher education has been considered both an ‘engine’ for innovation and a ‘catalyst’ for sustainability development; the integration of both the innovation engine and sustainability catalyst roles are discussed in a recently published Special Issue on the theme of Higher Education in Innovation Ecosystems in the journal Sustainability. Based on 16 articles contributing to the Special Issue from various perspectives, the Special Issue editors have developed an overarching framework about the relationships between higher education and innovation ecosystems. In the framework, we re-define the concept of innovation ecosystem and identify emerging roles of universities in developing sustainable innovation ecosystems. Re-conceptualization of innovation ecosystems In the editorial of the Special Issue, innovation ecosystem is defined as: co-innovation networks in which actors from organizations concerned with the functions of knowledge production, wealth creation, and norm control interact with each other in forming co-evolution and interdependent relations (both direct or indirect) in cross-geographical contexts and through which new ideas and approaches from various internal and external sources are integrated into a platform to generate shared values for the sustainable transformation of society. Compared with most commonly cited definitions of innovation ecosystem, our definition highlights three new aspects of interactions in co-innovation networks: cross-sectoral, transnational, and indirect, drawing insights from the literature including innovation, geography, and biology studies. The roles of universities in innovation ecosystems The emerging roles of universities in innovation ecosystems are as follows: (1) The role of universities is changing from being a central player in technology transfer to being an anchor in knowledge exchange; (2) universities are assuming a new role in trust-building between actors in innovation ecosystems; and (3) universities are not merely an entrepreneurial universities but are also institutional entrepreneur in the innovation ecosystem. The three emerging roles all indicate that universities are becoming the catalysts for sustainable development in innovation ecosystems. Knowledge exchange is crucial for sustainability; trust is the foundation of the sustainable networks; social entrepreneurship is indispensable for sustainable social change. Evidence in wider contexts A total of 44 authors from 10 countries contributed to the discussions on the changing roles of higher education in innovation ecosystems from varying perspectives. They also report transformations within higher education and universities’ responses to both external and internal transformations. When addressing these issues, the studies provide both theoretical and methodological contributions to the research on higher education in innovation ecosystems. The 16 articles can be generally placed into four categories: (1) new demands for universities arising from the transformation in society toward innovation ecosystems, (2) transformations within higher education responding to emerging societal demands, (3) dynamics of the interaction of university with other innovation actors in a transnational context, and (4) academic and student mobility for higher education innovation. Calling for a new research agenda While societal changes demand broader roles of universities, they also call for and leads to substantial changes within the internal fabric of the university. The innovations in both society and the universities necessitate a renewed understanding of higher education in society, which has become a new research agenda in studies on innovation in higher education. We hope our Special Issue will inspire and encourage more scholars to join the research field.

Humanities --- Education --- transnational industry cooperation --- transnational university cooperation --- transnational innovation ecosystem --- EU–China --- science, technology and innovation cooperation --- transdisciplinary approach --- artificial intelligence --- machine learning --- Higher Education --- University --- Entrepreneurial competences --- Employability --- Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) --- Open Innovation --- business creation --- technology transfer --- innovation --- innovation ecosystem --- entrepreneurship education --- science and technology --- sustainability --- higher education --- educational innovation --- Mexico --- academic mobility --- knowledge transfer --- higher education innovation --- institutional environment --- postgraduate education --- education level --- discipline background --- graduation institution --- R&amp --- D investment --- triple helix --- synergy mechanism --- national system of innovation --- China --- Belt and Road Initiative --- developmental model of intercultural sensitivity --- general model of instructional communication --- instructional beliefs model --- intercultural communication competence model --- green GDP --- environment --- sustainable development --- global innovation systems --- Chinese research university --- faculty income --- academic labor market --- ordinary labor market --- joint R&amp --- D institute --- institutional logics --- China’s innovation system --- China’s transnational Triple Helix linkages --- problem-solving --- critical reflection --- knowledge integration --- social learning --- systemic thinking --- entrepreneurial university --- entrepreneurship --- influencing factors --- sustainable universities --- corporate sustainability --- tensions --- integrative framework --- Finnish universities --- higher education system --- social entrepreneurship --- entrepreneurial universities --- business model innovation --- socialist economies --- Cuba --- knowledge brokers --- knowledge intensive policies --- smart specialisation --- innovation ecosystems --- global talent --- social integration --- economic integration --- Chinese student --- Finland --- university --- third mission --- knowledge-based society --- global innovation networks --- transnational industry cooperation --- transnational university cooperation --- transnational innovation ecosystem --- EU–China --- science, technology and innovation cooperation --- transdisciplinary approach --- artificial intelligence --- machine learning --- Higher Education --- University --- Entrepreneurial competences --- Employability --- Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) --- Open Innovation --- business creation --- technology transfer --- innovation --- innovation ecosystem --- entrepreneurship education --- science and technology --- sustainability --- higher education --- educational innovation --- Mexico --- academic mobility --- knowledge transfer --- higher education innovation --- institutional environment --- postgraduate education --- education level --- discipline background --- graduation institution --- R&amp --- D investment --- triple helix --- synergy mechanism --- national system of innovation --- China --- Belt and Road Initiative --- developmental model of intercultural sensitivity --- general model of instructional communication --- instructional beliefs model --- intercultural communication competence model --- green GDP --- environment --- sustainable development --- global innovation systems --- Chinese research university --- faculty income --- academic labor market --- ordinary labor market --- joint R&amp --- D institute --- institutional logics --- China’s innovation system --- China’s transnational Triple Helix linkages --- problem-solving --- critical reflection --- knowledge integration --- social learning --- systemic thinking --- entrepreneurial university --- entrepreneurship --- influencing factors --- sustainable universities --- corporate sustainability --- tensions --- integrative framework --- Finnish universities --- higher education system --- social entrepreneurship --- entrepreneurial universities --- business model innovation --- socialist economies --- Cuba --- knowledge brokers --- knowledge intensive policies --- smart specialisation --- innovation ecosystems --- global talent --- social integration --- economic integration --- Chinese student --- Finland --- university --- third mission --- knowledge-based society --- global innovation networks

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Higher education has been considered both an ‘engine’ for innovation and a ‘catalyst’ for sustainability development; the integration of both the innovation engine and sustainability catalyst roles are discussed in a recently published Special Issue on the theme of Higher Education in Innovation Ecosystems in the journal Sustainability. Based on 16 articles contributing to the Special Issue from various perspectives, the Special Issue editors have developed an overarching framework about the relationships between higher education and innovation ecosystems. In the framework, we re-define the concept of innovation ecosystem and identify emerging roles of universities in developing sustainable innovation ecosystems. Re-conceptualization of innovation ecosystems In the editorial of the Special Issue, innovation ecosystem is defined as: co-innovation networks in which actors from organizations concerned with the functions of knowledge production, wealth creation, and norm control interact with each other in forming co-evolution and interdependent relations (both direct or indirect) in cross-geographical contexts and through which new ideas and approaches from various internal and external sources are integrated into a platform to generate shared values for the sustainable transformation of society. Compared with most commonly cited definitions of innovation ecosystem, our definition highlights three new aspects of interactions in co-innovation networks: cross-sectoral, transnational, and indirect, drawing insights from the literature including innovation, geography, and biology studies. The roles of universities in innovation ecosystems The emerging roles of universities in innovation ecosystems are as follows: (1) The role of universities is changing from being a central player in technology transfer to being an anchor in knowledge exchange; (2) universities are assuming a new role in trust-building between actors in innovation ecosystems; and (3) universities are not merely an entrepreneurial universities but are also institutional entrepreneur in the innovation ecosystem. The three emerging roles all indicate that universities are becoming the catalysts for sustainable development in innovation ecosystems. Knowledge exchange is crucial for sustainability; trust is the foundation of the sustainable networks; social entrepreneurship is indispensable for sustainable social change. Evidence in wider contexts A total of 44 authors from 10 countries contributed to the discussions on the changing roles of higher education in innovation ecosystems from varying perspectives. They also report transformations within higher education and universities’ responses to both external and internal transformations. When addressing these issues, the studies provide both theoretical and methodological contributions to the research on higher education in innovation ecosystems. The 16 articles can be generally placed into four categories: (1) new demands for universities arising from the transformation in society toward innovation ecosystems, (2) transformations within higher education responding to emerging societal demands, (3) dynamics of the interaction of university with other innovation actors in a transnational context, and (4) academic and student mobility for higher education innovation. Calling for a new research agenda While societal changes demand broader roles of universities, they also call for and leads to substantial changes within the internal fabric of the university. The innovations in both society and the universities necessitate a renewed understanding of higher education in society, which has become a new research agenda in studies on innovation in higher education. We hope our Special Issue will inspire and encourage more scholars to join the research field.

Humanities --- Education --- transnational industry cooperation --- transnational university cooperation --- transnational innovation ecosystem --- EU–China --- science, technology and innovation cooperation --- transdisciplinary approach --- artificial intelligence --- machine learning --- Higher Education --- University --- Entrepreneurial competences --- Employability --- Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) --- Open Innovation --- business creation --- technology transfer --- innovation --- innovation ecosystem --- entrepreneurship education --- science and technology --- sustainability --- higher education --- educational innovation --- Mexico --- academic mobility --- knowledge transfer --- higher education innovation --- institutional environment --- postgraduate education --- education level --- discipline background --- graduation institution --- R&amp --- D investment --- triple helix --- synergy mechanism --- national system of innovation --- China --- Belt and Road Initiative --- developmental model of intercultural sensitivity --- general model of instructional communication --- instructional beliefs model --- intercultural communication competence model --- green GDP --- environment --- sustainable development --- global innovation systems --- Chinese research university --- faculty income --- academic labor market --- ordinary labor market --- joint R&amp --- D institute --- institutional logics --- China’s innovation system --- China’s transnational Triple Helix linkages --- problem-solving --- critical reflection --- knowledge integration --- social learning --- systemic thinking --- entrepreneurial university --- entrepreneurship --- influencing factors --- sustainable universities --- corporate sustainability --- tensions --- integrative framework --- Finnish universities --- higher education system --- social entrepreneurship --- entrepreneurial universities --- business model innovation --- socialist economies --- Cuba --- knowledge brokers --- knowledge intensive policies --- smart specialisation --- innovation ecosystems --- global talent --- social integration --- economic integration --- Chinese student --- Finland --- university --- third mission --- knowledge-based society --- global innovation networks