Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Foundationalism is a view about the structure of knowledge and justification. The heart of the thesis is the claim that if there is any knowledge or justified belief at all, then there is a kind of knowledge and justified belief that does not require inference from something else known or justifiably believed. This Element begins by exploring abstract arguments for foundationalism and against proposed alternatives. It then explores disagreements among foundationalists about how to understand foundational knowledge and justified belief, what is plausibly included in the foundations, and what is required for legitimate inference from foundations to the rest of what we believe. The author argues for the conclusion that one can combine insights captured by different versions of foundationalism by making a distinction between ideal justification and justification that falls short of that ideal.

Foundationalism (Theory of knowledge)

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Over the last two decades foundationalism has been severely criticized. In response to this various alternatives to it have been advanced, notably coherentism. At the same time new versions of foundationalism were crafted, that were claimed to be immune to the earlier criticisms. This volume contains 12 papers in which various aspects of this dialectic are covered. A number of papers continue the trend to defend foundationalism, and foundationalism's commitment to basic beliefs and basic knowledge, against various attacks. Others aim to show that one important objection against coherentism, viz. that the notion of 'coherence' is too vague to be useful, can be countered.

Foundationalism (Theory of knowledge) --- Knowledge, Theory of

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

A suite of questions concerning fundamentality lies at the heart of contemporary metaphysics. The relation of grounding, thought to connect the more to the less fundamental, sits at the heart of those debates in turn. Since most contemporary metaphysicians embrace the doctrine of physicalism and thus hold that reality is fundamentally physical, a natural question is how physics can inform the current debates over fundamentality and grounding. This Element introduces the reader to the concept of grounding and some of the key issues that animate contemporary debates around it, such as the question of whether grounding is 'unified' or 'plural' and whether there exists a fundamental level of reality. It moves on to show how resources from physics can help point the way towards their answers - thus furthering the case for a naturalistic approach to even the most fundamental of questions in metaphysics.

Metaphysics. --- Foundationalism (Theory of knowledge) --- Knowledge, Theory of --- Philosophy --- God --- Ontology --- Philosophy of mind

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Post-foundationalism departs from the assumption that there is no ground, necessity, or objective rationale for human political existence or action. The edited volume puts contemporary debates arising from the »spatial turn« in cultural and social sciences in a dialogue with post-foundational theories of space and place to devise post-foundationalism as radical approach to urban studies. This approach enables us to think about space not only as socially produced, but also as crucially marked by conflict, radical negativity, and absence. The contributors undertake a (re-)reading of key spatial and/or post-foundational theorists to introduce their respective understandings of politics and space, and offer examples of post-foundational empirical analyses of urban protests, spatial occupation, and everyday life.

Political Theory; Spatial Theory; Post-Foundationalism; Radical Geography; Urban Space; Urban Protest; Space; Geography; Social Geography; Cultural Geography --- Cultural Geography. --- Geography. --- Post-Foundationalism. --- Radical Geography. --- Social Geography. --- Space. --- Spatial Theory. --- Urban Protest. --- Urban Space.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Against various detractors (e.g. Wilfred Sellars, Donald Davidson, etc.), this book develops a foundationalist theory of epistemic justification. In contrast with Laurence BonJour and borrowing from John McDowell, the essential argument is that conceptualized perpetual experience provides a non-doxastic foundation for perceptual beliefs about physical objects.

Justification (Theory of knowledge) --- Knowledge, Theory of. --- Foundationalism (Theory of knowledge) --- Knowledge, Theory of --- Epistemology --- Theory of knowledge --- Philosophy --- Psychology