Listing 1 - 10 of 735 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Cet ouvrage a pour ambition de donner une portée clinique et politique à l'aphorisme « Céder n'est pas consentir ». Il démontre la profondeur de cette distinction, en s'appuyant sur la psychanalyse, la philosophie et la littérature. Le consentement porte toujours en lui une énigme, car consentir, c'est dire « oui », sans savoir, sur fond d'un pacte de confiance avec l'autre. Ce fondement énigmatique du consentement, qui peut aussi comporter une ambiguïté, ne doit pas être confondu avec le forçage. Cet essai pose donc la nécessité éthique d'affirmer une frontière entre « consentir » et « céder » en distinguant l'énigme du consentement comme expérience subjective, de l'expérience du traumatisme sexuel et psychique. Examinant les différents degrés du « se laisser faire », depuis l'expérience de la passion amoureuse jusqu'à celle d'un « se forcer soi-même à faire ce qu'on ne désire pas », Clotilde Leguil montre comment la frontière peut devenir trouble. Traumatisme de guerre, traumatisme intime, comment revenir de ce qui s'est produit ? Comment à nouveau consentir à dire ? S'inscrivant dans l'actualité du mouvement metoo, des collages anti-féminicides, et de la parution du récit événement de Vanessa Springora, cet essai, clinique et politique, fait valoir la nécessité de retrouve une langue à soi, pour pouvoir dire « je » à nouveau.
Choose an application
Consent is used in many different social and legal contexts with the pervasive understanding that it is, and has always been, about autonomy ? but has it? Beginning with an overview of consent?s role in law today, this book investigates the doctrine?s inseparable association with personal autonomy and its effect in producing both idealised and demonised forms of personhood and agency. This prompts a search for alternative understandings of consent. Through an exploration of sexual offences in Antiquity, medical practice in the Middle Ages, and the regulation of bodily harm on the present-day sports field, this book demonstrates that, in contrast to its common sense story of autonomy, consent more often operates as an act of submission than as a form of personal freedom or agency. The book explores the implications of this counter-narrative for the law?s contemporary uses of consent, arguing that the kind of freedom consent is meant to enact might be foreclosed by the very frame in which we think about autonomy itself. This book will be of interest to scholars of many aspects of law, history, and feminism as well as students of criminal law, bioethics, and political theory.
Choose an application
This chapter discusses monogamism as a type of systemic oppression enacted through ideas and practices that valorise monogamous people and relationships while systematically devaluing polyamorous and multi-partnered relationships. Instead of focusing on polyamorous/multi-partnered people, this chapter will apply the critical gaze of a sex and relationship therapist with polyamorous lived experience to examine and critique how psychotherapists behave toward polyamorous/multi-partnered people. Ansara explores how psychotherapists routinely engage in three common forms of monogamism: mononormative bias, couple-centric bias, and everyday monogamism. When examining these three forms of monogamism, Ansara explains how some ostensibly "neutral" and ubiquitous language, concepts, and clinical practices can enact monogamist oppression. This chapter then analyses how popular theoretical approaches to relationship counselling promote couple-centric bias and fail to address the key patterns, dynamics, and dilemmas in multi-partnered relationship systems. This includes an anti-racist, decolonial critique of Eurocentric approaches to Attachment Theory and the culture-bounded nature of mononormative biases. Finally, this chapter provides evidence-informed guidelines for anti-oppressive psychotherapeutic practice that can help polyamorous and multi-partnered people to strengthen attachment bonds, improve communications, and meet core emotional needs in their relational systems.
Choose an application
This chapter discusses monogamism as a type of systemic oppression enacted through ideas and practices that valorise monogamous people and relationships while systematically devaluing polyamorous and multi-partnered relationships. Instead of focusing on polyamorous/multi-partnered people, this chapter will apply the critical gaze of a sex and relationship therapist with polyamorous lived experience to examine and critique how psychotherapists behave toward polyamorous/multi-partnered people. Ansara explores how psychotherapists routinely engage in three common forms of monogamism: mononormative bias, couple-centric bias, and everyday monogamism. When examining these three forms of monogamism, Ansara explains how some ostensibly "neutral" and ubiquitous language, concepts, and clinical practices can enact monogamist oppression. This chapter then analyses how popular theoretical approaches to relationship counselling promote couple-centric bias and fail to address the key patterns, dynamics, and dilemmas in multi-partnered relationship systems. This includes an anti-racist, decolonial critique of Eurocentric approaches to Attachment Theory and the culture-bounded nature of mononormative biases. Finally, this chapter provides evidence-informed guidelines for anti-oppressive psychotherapeutic practice that can help polyamorous and multi-partnered people to strengthen attachment bonds, improve communications, and meet core emotional needs in their relational systems.
Choose an application
Consent (Law) --- Consent (Law). --- Germany.
Choose an application
Consent (Law) --- Consent (Law). --- Contracts --- Contracts. --- Netherlands.
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
Listing 1 - 10 of 735 | << page >> |
Sort by
|