Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This paper provides new evidence on how effectively piped water consumption subsidies are targeting poor households in 10 low- and middle-income countries around the world. The results suggest that, in these countries, existing tariff structures fall short of recovering the costs of service provision, and the resulting subsidies largely fail to achieve their goal of improving the accessibility and affordability of piped water for poor households. Instead, the majority of subsidies in all 10 countries are captured by the richest households. This is in part because the most vulnerable population segments typically face challenges in accessing and connecting to piped water services. The paper also reveals shortcomings in the design of the subsidies, which are conditional on poor households being connected to a piped network.

Access to Water --- Income Distribution --- Piped Water Service --- Subsidies --- Water Consumption --- Water Pipe Network --- Water Supply and Sanitation Economics --- Water Tariff

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Water and sanitation utilities in Africa operate in a high-cost environment. They also have a mandate to at least partially recover their costs of operations and maintenance (O&M). As a result, water tariffs are higher than in other regions of the world. The increasing block tariff (IBT) is the most common tariff structure in Africa. Most African utilities are able to achieve O&M cost recovery at the highest block tariffs, but not at the first-block tariffs, which are designed to provide affordable water to low-volume consumers, who are often poor. At the same time, few utilities can recover even a small part of their capital costs, even in the highest tariff blocks. Unfortunately, the equity objectives of the IBT structure are not met in many countries. The subsidy to the lowest tariff-block does not benefit the poor exclusively, and the minimum consumption charge is often burdensome for the poorest customers. Many poor households cannot even afford a connection to the piped water network. This can be a significant barrier to expansion for utilities. Therefore, many countries have begun to subsidize household connections. For many households, standposts managed by utilities, donors, or private operators have emerged as an alternative to piped water. Those managed by utilities or that supply utility water are expected to use the formal utility tariffs, which are kept low to make water affordable for low-income households. The price for water that is resold through informal channels, however, is much more expensive than piped water.

Affordable water --- Consumption charge --- Cost recovery --- Energy --- Energy Production and Transportation --- Household connections --- Households --- Infrastructure Economics --- Infrastructure Economics and Finance --- Low-income households --- Private operators --- Sanitation utilities --- Service providers --- Sewerage authority --- Sewerage corporation --- Tariff structure --- Town Water Supply and Sanitation --- Urban water --- Urban Water Supply and Sanitation --- Utilities --- Water board --- Water company --- Water consumption --- Water Supply and Sanitation --- Water Supply and Systems --- Water tariff --- Water tariffs --- Water utilities