Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Political sociology --- Europe --- Voting --- Elections --- Political parties --- Voting - European Union countries --- Elections - European Union countries --- Political parties - European Union countries
Choose an application
Every day thousands of decisions are made by all kinds of committees, parliaments, councils and boards by a 'yes-no' voting process. Sometimes a committee can only accept or reject the proposals submitted to it for a decision. On other occasions, committee members have the possibility of modifying the proposal and bargaining an agreement prior to the vote. In either case, what rule should be used if each member acts on behalf of a different-sized group? It seems intuitively clear that if the groups are of different sizes then a symmetric rule (e.g. the simple majority or unanimity) is not suitable. The question then arises of what voting rule should be used. Voting and Collective Decision-Making addresses this and other issues through a study of the theory of bargaining and voting power, showing how it applies to real decision-making contexts.
Decision making --- Voting --- Game theory --- Game theory. --- Polls --- Elections --- Politics, Practical --- Social choice --- Suffrage --- Games, Theory of --- Theory of games --- Mathematical models --- Mathematics --- Deciding --- Decision (Psychology) --- Decision analysis --- Decision processes --- Making decisions --- Management --- Management decisions --- Choice (Psychology) --- Problem solving --- Balloting --- Business, Economy and Management --- Economics --- Decision making - European Union countries --- Voting - European Union countries
Choose an application
Le vote populiste prolifère-t-il là où se concentrent les immigrés ? Les différents partis d'extrême droite en Europe traitent-ils l'immigration de la même manière ? La France se singularise-t-elle ? Autant de questions auxquelles Hervé Le Bras répond dans cet ouvrage, à l'aide d'une étude fouillée de sept pays – Allemagne, Autriche, Espagne, France, Italie, Royaume-Uni et Suisse. Il y décrypte les mutations d'une ligne idéologique inquiétante : après s'être dégagés des groupuscules nostalgiques du nazisme, du franquisme ou du fascisme, puis avoir tenté de présenter une façade respectable, les partis populistes de ces pays évoluent vers une vision identitaire, dramatisée en France par la notion de « grand remplacement ». Une lecture nécessaire au moment où les thématiques de l'extrême droite gagnent du terrain en Europe.
Populism - European Union countries - History - 21st century - Statistics --- Right-wing extremists - European Union countries - History - 21st century - Statistics --- Group identity - Political aspects - European Union countries --- Voting - European Union countries - History - 21st century --- European Union countries - Emigration and immigration - Political aspects --- Populism --- Right-wing extremists --- Group identity --- Voting --- European Union countries
Choose an application
This book provides a systematic comparative analysis of how and why voting behaviour has changed in Europe in recent decades. It has been widely argued that radical changes have occurred in the how and why of voting behaviour in Europe as a result of changes in the structure of society, most notably the rise in material affluence and educational attainment, and the decline in religious observance and the size of the working class. But most tests of this proposition have been undertaken on single countries. This book, however, systematically tests the validity of this proposition across various European countries. The argument that social change has altered voting behaviour has been increasingly challenged on the grounds that it takes too little account of changes in the choices that are put before voters by the parties, such as the promises and proposals that are put forward at election time. This book, therefore, also assesses the relative explanatory power of claims that voting behaviour has changed because of changes in society against claims that it responds to changes in the offerings of political parties.And it is clear from the analyses reported in this book that contrary to the claims of much of the extant literature, the latter argument appears better able to account for many of the patterns and changes in European voting behaviour, and thus the book constitutes an important challenge to much current academic orthodoxy. This is the first book to provide a systematic comparison of the long-term dynamics of the voting behaviour of individual voters across such a wide range of European countries, taking into account the dynamics of the choices put before voters by the parties and, for the first time, relating this to the way voters behave. "Comparative Politics" is a series for students and teachers of political science that deals with contemporary issues in comparative government and politics. The General Editors are Max Kaase, Professor of Political Science, Vice President and Dean, School of Humanities and Social Science, International University Bremen; and Kenneth Newton, Professor of Comparative Politics, University of Southampton. The series is published in association with the European Consortium for Political Research.
Political parties --- Political sociology --- Europe --- Voting --- Voting research --- Elections --- Representative government and representation --- Comparative government --- Vote --- Sociologie électorale --- Gouvernement représentatif --- Institutions politiques comparées --- #SBIB:054.AANKOOP --- #SBIB:324H42 --- #SBIB:324H43 --- Politieke structuren: verkiezingen --- Politieke structuren: politieke partijen --- Political participation --- Sociologie électorale --- Gouvernement représentatif --- Institutions politiques comparées --- Polls --- Politics, Practical --- Social choice --- Suffrage --- Balloting --- Voting - European Union countries --- Political participation - European Union countries --- Political parties - European Union countries
Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|