Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Under Protest, by Fort Hare alumnus Daniel Massey, combines a trove of previously untapped university records with the recollections of dozens of former students to dig deep into the complex past of the institution that educated figures like Tambo, Nelson Mandela, Mangosuthu Buthelezi and Robert Mugabe. Through the eyes of former students, we see just how the university veered sharply off the course intended by its missionary founders and apartheid trustees, giving birth to many of the most important leaders in South Africa's struggle for democracy. Massey interviews Fort Harians ranging from Govan Mbeki and Wycliffe Tsotsi to Jeff Baqwa and Thenjiwe Mtintso, who explain the vital role Fort Hare played in the development of their activism. He pays particular attention to the 1960 government takeover, showing how the authorities' attempt to stifle student protest ended up creating the hothouse conditions that eventually brought apartheid to its knees.
Student movements --- Apartheid --- Blacks --- Segregation --- Activism, Student --- Campus disorders --- Student activism --- Student protest --- Student unrest --- Youth movements --- Student protesters --- University of Fort Hare --- Fort Hare (South Africa). --- Fort Hare, South Africa. --- Fort Hare University --- UFH --- Universiteit van Fort Hare --- University College of Fort Hare --- History. --- Alumni and alumnae. --- Black people
Choose an application
Thromboembolism is a compelling challenge in cancer care because of its life-threatening nature as well as its impact on specific treatments. Current guidelines do not generally recommend antithrombotic prophylaxis, except in selected categories of patients at high risk of thrombosis. Accordingly, several clinical decision models have been developed to guide the oncologist in thromboembolic risk assessment and targeted prophylaxis. Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) are currently considered as the standard approach in clinical practice guidelines, but recent randomized controlled trials (RCT) indicate that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are effective for the treatment/prophylaxis of cancer-associated thromboembolism. However, many unanswered questions remain on the efficacy and safety of anticoagulants in selected cancer subgroups, and in primary and secondary prevention settings, where anticoagulation needs to be balanced on the risk of bleeding complications. Presently, patient selection remains the main challenge. Improvement in existing VTE risk models or the construction of alternative risk assessment tools are needed in order to ameliorate the risk stratification of cancer patients. This reprint will cover the current clinical evidence supporting the standard of care and emerging treatment/prophylactic options for cancer-associated thromboembolism during both active treatment and simultaneous/palliative care. Tailored approaches based on the use of individualized factors to stratify the thrombotic/bleeding risk in each individual patient are discussed.
Medicine --- Oncology --- multiple myeloma --- venous thromboembolism --- risk assessment models --- thromboprophylaxis --- direct oral anticoagulants --- cancer-associated venous thromboembolism --- thrombosis --- pulmonary embolism --- neoplasms --- anticoagulants --- coumarins --- low molecular weight heparins --- cancer --- endogenous heparin --- heparanase --- heparan sulfate --- hospice --- palliative care units --- low molecular weight heparin --- deep vein thrombosis --- cancer associated thrombosis --- VTE --- malignancy --- direct oral anticoagulant --- pancreatic cancer --- low-molecular weight heparin --- survival --- coagulation activation --- locally advanced breast cancer --- prognostic model --- pCR --- treatment --- prophylaxis --- DOAC --- simultaneous care --- integrated care --- lymphoma --- Non-Hodgkin lymphoma --- Hodgkin lymphoma --- risk factors --- molecular subtype --- arterial thrombosis --- ALK --- ROS1 --- KRAS --- chemotherapy --- low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) --- VKA --- UFH --- DOACs --- n/a
Choose an application
Thromboembolism is a compelling challenge in cancer care because of its life-threatening nature as well as its impact on specific treatments. Current guidelines do not generally recommend antithrombotic prophylaxis, except in selected categories of patients at high risk of thrombosis. Accordingly, several clinical decision models have been developed to guide the oncologist in thromboembolic risk assessment and targeted prophylaxis. Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) are currently considered as the standard approach in clinical practice guidelines, but recent randomized controlled trials (RCT) indicate that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are effective for the treatment/prophylaxis of cancer-associated thromboembolism. However, many unanswered questions remain on the efficacy and safety of anticoagulants in selected cancer subgroups, and in primary and secondary prevention settings, where anticoagulation needs to be balanced on the risk of bleeding complications. Presently, patient selection remains the main challenge. Improvement in existing VTE risk models or the construction of alternative risk assessment tools are needed in order to ameliorate the risk stratification of cancer patients. This reprint will cover the current clinical evidence supporting the standard of care and emerging treatment/prophylactic options for cancer-associated thromboembolism during both active treatment and simultaneous/palliative care. Tailored approaches based on the use of individualized factors to stratify the thrombotic/bleeding risk in each individual patient are discussed.
multiple myeloma --- venous thromboembolism --- risk assessment models --- thromboprophylaxis --- direct oral anticoagulants --- cancer-associated venous thromboembolism --- thrombosis --- pulmonary embolism --- neoplasms --- anticoagulants --- coumarins --- low molecular weight heparins --- cancer --- endogenous heparin --- heparanase --- heparan sulfate --- hospice --- palliative care units --- low molecular weight heparin --- deep vein thrombosis --- cancer associated thrombosis --- VTE --- malignancy --- direct oral anticoagulant --- pancreatic cancer --- low-molecular weight heparin --- survival --- coagulation activation --- locally advanced breast cancer --- prognostic model --- pCR --- treatment --- prophylaxis --- DOAC --- simultaneous care --- integrated care --- lymphoma --- Non-Hodgkin lymphoma --- Hodgkin lymphoma --- risk factors --- molecular subtype --- arterial thrombosis --- ALK --- ROS1 --- KRAS --- chemotherapy --- low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) --- VKA --- UFH --- DOACs --- n/a
Choose an application
Thromboembolism is a compelling challenge in cancer care because of its life-threatening nature as well as its impact on specific treatments. Current guidelines do not generally recommend antithrombotic prophylaxis, except in selected categories of patients at high risk of thrombosis. Accordingly, several clinical decision models have been developed to guide the oncologist in thromboembolic risk assessment and targeted prophylaxis. Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) are currently considered as the standard approach in clinical practice guidelines, but recent randomized controlled trials (RCT) indicate that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are effective for the treatment/prophylaxis of cancer-associated thromboembolism. However, many unanswered questions remain on the efficacy and safety of anticoagulants in selected cancer subgroups, and in primary and secondary prevention settings, where anticoagulation needs to be balanced on the risk of bleeding complications. Presently, patient selection remains the main challenge. Improvement in existing VTE risk models or the construction of alternative risk assessment tools are needed in order to ameliorate the risk stratification of cancer patients. This reprint will cover the current clinical evidence supporting the standard of care and emerging treatment/prophylactic options for cancer-associated thromboembolism during both active treatment and simultaneous/palliative care. Tailored approaches based on the use of individualized factors to stratify the thrombotic/bleeding risk in each individual patient are discussed.
Medicine --- Oncology --- multiple myeloma --- venous thromboembolism --- risk assessment models --- thromboprophylaxis --- direct oral anticoagulants --- cancer-associated venous thromboembolism --- thrombosis --- pulmonary embolism --- neoplasms --- anticoagulants --- coumarins --- low molecular weight heparins --- cancer --- endogenous heparin --- heparanase --- heparan sulfate --- hospice --- palliative care units --- low molecular weight heparin --- deep vein thrombosis --- cancer associated thrombosis --- VTE --- malignancy --- direct oral anticoagulant --- pancreatic cancer --- low-molecular weight heparin --- survival --- coagulation activation --- locally advanced breast cancer --- prognostic model --- pCR --- treatment --- prophylaxis --- DOAC --- simultaneous care --- integrated care --- lymphoma --- Non-Hodgkin lymphoma --- Hodgkin lymphoma --- risk factors --- molecular subtype --- arterial thrombosis --- ALK --- ROS1 --- KRAS --- chemotherapy --- low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) --- VKA --- UFH --- DOACs --- multiple myeloma --- venous thromboembolism --- risk assessment models --- thromboprophylaxis --- direct oral anticoagulants --- cancer-associated venous thromboembolism --- thrombosis --- pulmonary embolism --- neoplasms --- anticoagulants --- coumarins --- low molecular weight heparins --- cancer --- endogenous heparin --- heparanase --- heparan sulfate --- hospice --- palliative care units --- low molecular weight heparin --- deep vein thrombosis --- cancer associated thrombosis --- VTE --- malignancy --- direct oral anticoagulant --- pancreatic cancer --- low-molecular weight heparin --- survival --- coagulation activation --- locally advanced breast cancer --- prognostic model --- pCR --- treatment --- prophylaxis --- DOAC --- simultaneous care --- integrated care --- lymphoma --- Non-Hodgkin lymphoma --- Hodgkin lymphoma --- risk factors --- molecular subtype --- arterial thrombosis --- ALK --- ROS1 --- KRAS --- chemotherapy --- low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) --- VKA --- UFH --- DOACs
Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|