Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This volume presents coverage of the jury systems of Australia England, Canada, New Zealand, the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland, Scotland, and the United States. Coverage includes civil as well as criminal juries.

Jury --- Law, General & Comparative --- Law, Politics & Government --- Judgments by peers --- Juries --- Trial by jury --- Trial by peers --- Trials --- Law and fact --- Lay judges --- Law and legislation --- Jury.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

While jury decision making has received considerable attention from social scientists, there have been few efforts to systematically pull together all the pieces of this research. In Jury Decision Making Dennis J. Devine examines over 50 years of research on juries and offers a “big picture” overview of the field. The volume summarizes existing theories of jury decision making and identifies what we have learned about jury behavior, including the effects of specific courtroom practices, the nature of the trial, the characteristics of the participants, and the evidence itself. Making use of those foundations, Devine offers a new integrated theory of jury decision making that addresses both individual jurors and juries as a whole and discusses its ramifications for the courts. Providing a unique combination of broad scope, extensive coverage of the empirical research conducted over the last half century, and theory advancement, this accessible and engaging volume offers "one-stop shopping" for scholars, students, legal professionals, and those who simply wish to better understand how well the jury system works.

Jury --- Judgments by peers --- Juries --- Trial by jury --- Trial by peers --- Trials --- Law and fact --- Lay judges --- Psychological aspects. --- Decision making. --- Law and legislation

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This book explores the role of mens rea, broadly defined as a factor in jury assessments of guilt and innocence from the early thirteenth through the fourteenth century - the first two centuries of the English criminal trial jury. Drawing upon evidence from the plea rolls, but also relying heavily upon non-legal textual sources such as popular literature and guides for confessors, Elizabeth Papp Kamali argues that issues of mind were central to jurors' determinations of whether a particular defendant should be convicted, pardoned, or acquitted outright. Demonstrating that the word 'felony' itself connoted a guilty state of mind, she explores the interplay between social conceptions of guilt and innocence and jury behavior. Furthermore, she reveals a medieval understanding of felony that involved, in its paradigmatic form, three essential elements: an act that was reasoned, was willed in a way not constrained by necessity, and was evil or wicked in its essence.

Jury --- Judgments by peers --- Juries --- Trial by jury --- Trial by peers --- Trials --- Law and fact --- Lay judges --- History --- Law and legislation

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Jury --- 343.161 --- Jury--(rechtsvordering) --- 343.161 Jury--(rechtsvordering) --- Judgments by peers --- Juries --- Trial by jury --- Trial by peers --- Trials --- Law and fact --- Lay judges --- Law and legislation --- Jury - Great Britain. --- Jury - Australia.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

343.1 --- Jury --- -Jury --- -Judgments by peers --- Juries --- Trial by jury --- Trial by peers --- Trials --- Law and fact --- Lay judges --- Strafvordering --(algemeen) --- Law and legislation --- -Strafvordering --(algemeen) --- 343.1 Strafvordering --(algemeen) --- Judgments by peers