Listing 1 - 5 of 5 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Choose an application
Political philosophy. Social philosophy --- Spinoza, Baruch --- Philosophy and religion --- Free thought --- Political science --- Philosophie et religion --- History --- Spinoza, Benedictus de, --- Free thought. --- Philosophy and religion. --- Political science. --- Tractatus politicus (Spinoza, Benedictus de). --- Tractatus theologico-politicus (Spinoza, Benedictus de). --- 1600-1699.
Choose an application
Examining the birth and development of early modern atheism from Spinoza's Tractatus theologico-politicus (1670) to d'Holbach's Système de la nature (1770), this study considers Spinoza, Hobbes, Cudworth, Bayle, Meslier, Boulainviller, Du Marsais, Fréret, Toland, Collins, Hume, Diderot, Voltaire, and d'Holbach and positions them in a general interpretive scheme, based on the idea that early modern atheism is itself an unwanted fruit of early modern metaphysics and theology.Breaking with a long-standing tradition, Descartes claimed that it was possible to have a "clear and distinct" idea of God, indeed that the idea of God was the "clearest and most distinct" of all ideas accessible to the human mind. Humans could thus obtain a scientific knowledge of God's nature and attributes. But as soon as God became an object of science, He also became the object of a thoroughgoing scientific analysis and criticism.The effortlessness with which early modern atheists managed to turn round their adversaries' arguments to their own favour is a sign that the new doctrines of God which emerged in the seventeenth-century, each based in its own way on principles and dogmas related to the new science of nature, were plunging headfirst towards the precipice under their own steam.
Atheism --- Atheism. --- Voltaire --- irreligious thought --- Hume --- Spinoza --- Bayle --- enlightenment --- History --- Spinoza, Benedictus de, --- Holbach, Paul Henri Thiry, --- Système de la nature (Holbach, Paul Henri Thiry, baron d') --- Tractatus theologico-politicus (Spinoza, Benedictus de) --- 1600-1799
Choose an application
Leo Strauss articulates the conflict between reason and revelation as he explores Spinoza's scientific, comparative, and textual treatment of the Bible. Strauss compares Spinoza's Theologico-political Treatise and the Epistles, showing their relation to critical controversy on religion from Epicurus and Lucretius through Uriel da Costa and Isaac Peyrere to Thomas Hobbes. Strauss's autobiographical Preface, traces his dilemmas as a young liberal intellectual in Germany during the Weimar Republic, as a scholar in exile, and as a leader of American philosophical thought. "[For] those interested in Strauss the political philosopher, and also those who doubt whether we have achieved the 'final solution' in respect to either the character of political science or the problem of the relation of religion to the state." -Journal of Politics "A substantial contribution to the thinking of all those interested in the ageless problems of faith, revelation, and reason." -Kirkus Reviews Leo Strauss (1899-1973) was the Robert Maynard Hutchins Distinguished Service Professor Emeritus of political science at the University of Chicago. His contributions to political science include The Political Philosophy of Hobbes, The City and the Man, What is Political Philosophy?, and Liberalism Ancient and Modern.
Religion --- Spinoza, Benedictus de, --- RELIGION --- Religion. --- Philosophy. --- Tractatus theologico-politicus (Spinoza, Benedictus de). --- Godsdienstfilosofie. --- Filosofia moderna --- Spinoza, Benedictus de. --- critical, critique, theory, theoretical, analysis, analytical, religion, religious studies, faith, belief, hily, reason, revelation, philosophy, philosopher, philosophical, controversial, controversy, epicurus, lucretius, uriel da costa, isaac peyrere, thomas hobbes, intellectual, autobiographical, biographical, politics, political.
Choose an application
Examining the birth and development of early modern atheism from Spinoza's Tractatus theologico-politicus (1670) to d'Holbach's Système de la nature (1770), this study considers Spinoza, Hobbes, Cudworth, Bayle, Meslier, Boulainviller, Du Marsais, Fréret, Toland, Collins, Hume, Diderot, Voltaire, and d'Holbach and positions them in a general interpretive scheme, based on the idea that early modern atheism is itself an unwanted fruit of early modern metaphysics and theology.Breaking with a long-standing tradition, Descartes claimed that it was possible to have a "clear and distinct" idea of God, indeed that the idea of God was the "clearest and most distinct" of all ideas accessible to the human mind. Humans could thus obtain a scientific knowledge of God's nature and attributes. But as soon as God became an object of science, He also became the object of a thoroughgoing scientific analysis and criticism.The effortlessness with which early modern atheists managed to turn round their adversaries' arguments to their own favour is a sign that the new doctrines of God which emerged in the seventeenth-century, each based in its own way on principles and dogmas related to the new science of nature, were plunging headfirst towards the precipice under their own steam.
Atheism. --- Atheism --- Philosophy --- Agnosticism --- Free thought --- Irreligion --- Religion --- Secularism --- Theism --- History --- Spinoza, Benedictus de, --- Holbach, Paul Henri Thiry, --- Natural theology --- Système de la nature (Holbach, Paul Henri Thiry, baron d') --- Tractatus theologico-politicus (Spinoza, Benedictus de) --- 1600-1799 --- Philosophy and religion --- Enlightenment --- History. --- de Spinoza, Benedictus --- d'Holbach, Paul Henri Thiry --- von Holbach, Paul Heinrich Dietrich --- Holbach, Paul Henri Thiery, --- Holbach, Paul Heinrich Dietrich, --- Thiry, Paul Henri, --- Thiery, Paul Henri, --- Thierry, Paul Henri, --- Dietrich, Paul Henri, --- Thyry, Paul Henri, --- Holbach, Paul Thiry, --- Holbach, --- D'Holbach, --- M. D***, --- D***, --- Ancien magistrat, --- Bernier, --- Olbach, --- Orbach, --- Halbach, --- Holbah, Pol, --- Golʹbakh, Polʹ, --- Holbakh, Pol, --- Ispīnūzā, --- Spinoza, Baruch, --- Espinoza, Baruch d', --- Sbīnūzā, --- Espinosa, Baruch de, --- Shpinozah, --- Shpinozah, Barukh, --- Spinoza, Benedict de, --- Spinoza, Barukh, --- Spinoza, Baruch de, --- Spinoza, Benoît de, --- ספינאזא, ברוך דע --- ספינאזא, ברוך, --- שפימוזה, ברוך --- שפינאזא, בענעדיקט --- שפינאזא, ברוך --- שפינאזע, ברוך --- שפינוזא, בנדיקטוס --- שפינוזהת ברוך, --- שפינוזה, ברוך --- שפינוזה, ברוך די, --- שפינוזה, ברוך, --- שפינוזה, ב. --- سبينوزا، بندكتس --- Spinoza, Benedictus de --- Spinoza, Baruch --- Spinoza, Benedict de
Listing 1 - 5 of 5 |
Sort by
|