Listing 1 - 10 of 154 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
Pour composer leurs évangiles, Matthieu et Luc ont très certainement disposé de l'évangile de Marc, mais fort probablement aussi d'un document, aujourd'hui perdu. Ce document - " la Source " ou " Q " (de l'allemand Quelle, source) - a récemment fait l'objet d'une reconstitution par trois spécialistes de réputation internationale. L'auteur propose une traduction en français de leur texte grec (un livret séparé en facilite la lecture et la consultation) : il vise prioritairement à mettre en valeur le sent des paroles recueillies. Puis il questionne la Source sur le message de Jésus, les gens auxquels il était adressé, le monde nouveau dont Jésus annonçait l'avènement. Sous le discours, on voit se dessiner la personne de Jésus et aussi une image inattendue de Dieu. La source a fixé une autre filière de la tradition évangélique que celle recueillie (et organiste en récit) par Marc. L'essentiel se présente comme une simple collection de paroles de Jésus ; le tout constitue alors un évangile sans récit de la Passion. L'auteur consacre deux chapitres substantiels à une comparaison détaillée de ces deux filières. La tradition évangélique a eu elle-même une vie, donc une histoire. Certains recoupements apparaissent comme particulièrement saisissants et laissent l'impression qu'on n'est vraiment pas loin des paroles mêmes de Jésus.
Choose an application
Choose an application
In this landmark study of the literary relationship between the gospel of John and the synoptic gospels, Gary Greenberg presents compelling evidence for the existence of a written pre-canonical Alpha gospel that contained almost all of the main episodes in the adult life of Jesus (excluding major speeches, such as discourses, parables, and "I Am" sayings) and which became the written source for the core biography of Jesus in Mark, Luke, John, and Matthew. While Mark used the Alpha gospel with only slight variations, John had profound theological disagreements with it, objecting to its theological message about how to obtain eternal life, the depiction of Jesus, and other matters. This induced him to rewrite the Alpha gospel so that it conformed to his own very different theological agenda. Consequently, John’s gospel functions as a thorough theological critique of Mark, but the changes he introduced made it difficult to see how he and Mark worked from the same written source. By using John’s theological concerns as a filter for reading and understanding what objections John would have with Mark’s Jesus stories, The Case for a Proto-Gospel reverse-engineers the editorial path taken by John and reconstructs the content of the Alpha gospel. Finally, the author discusses the relationship of the other two synoptic gospels to the Alpha gospel, asserting that Luke also knew the Alpha gospel but used Mark as his primary source, and that while Matthew did not know the Alpha gospel, his use of Mark as a primary source ensured that his core biography of Jesus also derived from this earlier source.
Choose an application
Jesus of Nazareth as Messianic teacher stood at the beginning of the Gospel tradition. Rainer Riesner shows that his poetically formed teaching summaries and evocative parables could be impressed on the memory of his hearers and that a continuity of transmission reaching to the Synoptic Gospels existed through the circle of his disciples.“Riesner has done about as masterful a job as possible in illustrating his thesis of the possibility, plausibility, and even necessity for a historically reliable pre-Easter beginning of the gospel tradition.”John P. Heil in Catholic Biblical Quarterly, Vol. 45, No. 4, 1983, pp. 702–703
Choose an application
Choose an application
Listing 1 - 10 of 154 | << page >> |
Sort by
|