Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Religion and the Racist Right: The Origins of the Christian Identity Movement

Anglo-Israelism --- White supremacy movements --- British-Israelism --- Jews --- Lost tribes of Israel --- Supremacist movements, White --- Supremacy movements, White --- White supremacist movements --- Social movements --- White nationalism --- Skinheads --- History. --- Identity --- United States --- Race relations. --- Race question

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

From rap to folk to punk, music has often sought to shape its listeners' political views, uniting them as a global community and inspiring them to take action. Yet the rallying potential of music can also be harnessed for sinister ends. As this groundbreaking new book reveals, white-power music has served as a key recruiting tool for neo-Nazi and racist hate groups worldwide. Reichsrock shines a light on the international white-power music industry, the fandoms it has spawned, and the virulently racist beliefs it perpetuates. Kirsten Dyck not only investigates how white-power bands and their fans have used the internet to spread their message globally, but also considers how distinctly local white-power scenes have emerged in Western Europe, Eastern Europe, Latin America, the United States, and many other sites. While exploring how white-power bands draw from a common well of nationalist, racist, and neo-Nazi ideologies, the book thus also illuminates how white-power musicians adapt their music to different locations, many of which have their own terms for defining whiteness and racial otherness. Closely tracking the online presence of white-power musicians and their fans, Dyck analyzes the virtual forums and media they use to articulate their hateful rhetoric. This book also demonstrates how this fandom has sparked spectacular violence in the real world, from bombings to mass shootings. Reichsrock thus sounds an urgent message about a global menace.

Heavy metal (Music) --- Punk rock music --- Social aspects. --- Political aspects. --- Metal (Music) --- Alternative rock music --- Punk culture --- Rock music --- Hate groups. --- Neo-Nazism. --- White supremacy movements. --- Supremacist movements, White --- Supremacy movements, White --- White supremacist movements --- Social movements --- White nationalism --- Skinheads --- Neo-Nazi groups --- Neo-Nazi movements --- Neo-Nazi parties --- Fascism --- National socialism --- Social groups

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Black Consciousness in South Africa provides a new perspective on black politics in South Africa. It demonstrates and assesses critically the radical character and aspirations of African resistance to white minority rule.Robert Fatton analyzes the development and radicalization of South Africa's Black Consciousness Movement from its inception in the late 1960s to its banning in 1977. He rejects the widely accepted interpretation of the Black Consciousness Movement as an exclusively cultural and racial expression of African resistance to racism. Instead Fatton argues that over the course of its existence, the Movement developed a revolutionary ideology capable of challenging the cultural and political hegemony of apartheid. The Black Consciousness Movement came to be a synthesis of class awareness and black cultural assertiveness. It represented the ethico-political weapon of an oppressed class struggling to reaffirm its humanity through active participation in the demise of a racist and capitalist system.

Blacks --- White supremacy movements --- Politics and government. --- Race identity --- Social conditions. --- History. --- South Africa --- Politics and government --- Social conditions --- Race relations. --- Black persons --- Negroes --- Ethnology --- Supremacist movements, White --- Supremacy movements, White --- White supremacist movements --- Social movements --- White nationalism --- Skinheads --- Race question --- Black people --- Africa --- History --- South africa --- Apartheid --- Social science

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

A controversial argument for reconsidering the limits of free speech Swirling in the midst of the resurgence of neo-Nazi demonstrations, hate speech, and acts of domestic terrorism are uncomfortable questions about the limits of free speech. The United States stands apart from many other countries in that citizens have the power to say virtually anything without legal repercussions. But, in the case of white supremacy, does the First Amendment demand that we defend Nazis? In Must We Defend Nazis?, legal experts Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic argue that it should not. Updated to consider the white supremacy demonstrations and counter-protests in Charlottesville and debates about hate speech on campus and on the internet, the book offers a concise argument against total, unchecked freedom of speech. Delgado and Stefancic instead call for a system of free speech that takes into account the harms that hate speech can inflict upon disempowered, marginalized people. They examine the prevailing arguments against regulating speech, and show that they all have answers. They also show how limiting free speech would work in a legal framework and offer suggestions for activist lawyers and judges interested in approaching the hate speech controversy intelligently. As citizens are confronting free speech in contention with equal dignity, access, and respect, Must We Defend Nazis? puts aside clichés that clutter First Amendment thinking, and presents a nuanced position that recognizes the needs of our increasingly diverse society.A controversial argument for reconsidering the limits of free speech Swirling in the midst of the resurgence of neo-Nazi demonstrations, hate speech, and acts of domestic terrorism are uncomfortable questions about the limits of free speech. The United States stands apart from many other countries in that citizens have the power to say virtually anything without legal repercussions. But, in the case of white supremacy, does the First Amendment demand that we defend Nazis? In Must We Defend Nazis?, legal experts Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic argue that it should not. Updated to consider the white supremacy demonstrations and counter-protests in Charlottesville and debates about hate speech on campus and on the internet, the book offers a concise argument against total, unchecked freedom of speech. Delgado and Stefancic instead call for a system of free speech that takes into account the harms that hate speech can inflict upon disempowered, marginalized people. They examine the prevailing arguments against regulating speech, and show that they all have answers. They also show how limiting free speech would work in a legal framework and offer suggestions for activist lawyers and judges interested in approaching the hate speech controversy intelligently. As citizens are confronting free speech in contention with equal dignity, access, and respect, Must We Defend Nazis? puts aside clichés that clutter First Amendment thinking, and presents a nuanced position that recognizes the needs of our increasingly diverse society.

White supremacy movements. --- Nazis. --- Freedom of speech --- Hate speech --- Defamation against groups --- Group defamation --- Group libel --- Racist speech --- Speech, Hate --- Libel and slander --- National socialists --- Fascists --- Socialists --- National socialism --- Neo-Nazis --- Supremacist movements, White --- Supremacy movements, White --- White supremacist movements --- Social movements --- White nationalism --- Skinheads --- Law and legislation --- United States.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

An original and exciting work of comparative history, this book analyses the origins of segregation as a specific stage in the evolution of white supremacy in South Africa and the American South. Unlike scholars who have attributed twentieth-century patterns of race relations to the continuation of earlier social norms and attitudes, Cell understands segregation as a distinct system and ideology of race and class division, closely associated with urbanisation, industrialisation, and modern processes of state and party formation. Originally advocated by moderates and liberals, rather than by racist fanatic with whom it later came to be identified, segregation became comparatively sophisticated, flexible, and absorptive. In its ambiguities even advocates of black power could sometimes find a basis for collaboration.

Apartheid --- Segregation --- African Americans --- White supremacy movements --- South Africa --- Southern States --- Race relations. --- Arts and Humanities --- History --- Black people --- Blacks --- Supremacist movements, White --- Supremacy movements, White --- White supremacist movements --- Social movements --- White nationalism --- Skinheads --- Afro-Americans --- Black Americans --- Colored people (United States) --- Negroes --- Africans --- Ethnology --- Desegregation --- Race discrimination --- Minorities --- Race question