Listing 1 - 2 of 2 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Corporate governance in the private sector and corruption are important for economic development and private sector development. This paper investigates how corporate governance in private-sector media companies can affect public corruption. The analytical framework, based on models of corporate governance, identifies two channels through which media ownership concentration affects corruption: an owner effect, which discourages corruption and a competition-for-control effect that enhances it. When the ownership structure of a newspaper has a majority shareholder, the first effect dominates and corruption decreases as ownership becomes more concentrated in the hands of majority shareholders. Without majority shareholders, the competition-for-control effect dominates and corruption increases with the concentration of ownership of the media company. Thus, the paper shows that cases of intermediate media-ownership concentration are the worst at promoting public accountability, while extreme situations, where the ownership is completely concentrated or widely held, can result in similar and lower levels of corruption.
Accountability --- Bribe --- Bribes --- Collusion --- Company --- Corporate governance --- Corporate Law --- Corrupt --- Corruption --- Debt Markets --- Democracy --- Economic Theory & Research --- Emerging Markets --- Finance and Financial Sector Development --- Government officials --- Law and Development --- Macroeconomics and Economic Growth --- Majority shareholder --- Majority shareholders --- Media --- Monopoly --- Ownership concentration --- Ownership structure --- Politician --- Politicians --- Private Sector Development --- Privatization --- Public Sector Corruption & Anticorruption Measures --- Public Sector Development --- Stolen public funds
Choose an application
Corporate governance in the private sector and corruption are important for economic development and private sector development. This paper investigates how corporate governance in private-sector media companies can affect public corruption. The analytical framework, based on models of corporate governance, identifies two channels through which media ownership concentration affects corruption: an owner effect, which discourages corruption and a competition-for-control effect that enhances it. When the ownership structure of a newspaper has a majority shareholder, the first effect dominates and corruption decreases as ownership becomes more concentrated in the hands of majority shareholders. Without majority shareholders, the competition-for-control effect dominates and corruption increases with the concentration of ownership of the media company. Thus, the paper shows that cases of intermediate media-ownership concentration are the worst at promoting public accountability, while extreme situations, where the ownership is completely concentrated or widely held, can result in similar and lower levels of corruption.
Accountability --- Bribe --- Bribes --- Collusion --- Company --- Corporate governance --- Corporate Law --- Corrupt --- Corruption --- Debt Markets --- Democracy --- Economic Theory & Research --- Emerging Markets --- Finance and Financial Sector Development --- Government officials --- Law and Development --- Macroeconomics and Economic Growth --- Majority shareholder --- Majority shareholders --- Media --- Monopoly --- Ownership concentration --- Ownership structure --- Politician --- Politicians --- Private Sector Development --- Privatization --- Public Sector Corruption & Anticorruption Measures --- Public Sector Development --- Stolen public funds
Listing 1 - 2 of 2 |
Sort by
|