Listing 1 - 6 of 6 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Public law. Constitutional law --- Sociology of law --- Psychology and law --- Justice, Administration of --- -Law --- -Punishment --- -Public opinion --- Public opinion --- Philosophy --- -Penalties (Criminal law) --- Penology --- Corrections --- Impunity --- Retribution --- Opinion, Public --- Perception, Public --- Popular opinion --- Public perception --- Public perceptions --- Judgment --- Social psychology --- Attitude (Psychology) --- Focus groups --- Reputation --- Acts, Legislative --- Enactments, Legislative --- Laws (Statutes) --- Legislative acts --- Legislative enactments --- Jurisprudence --- Legislation --- Administration of justice --- Law --- Courts --- Law and legislation --- Punishment --- Public opinion. --- Justice [Administration of ] --- Illinois (Etat) --- Chicago (Ill.) --- Law - Philosophy - Public opinion. --- Justice, Administration of - Public opinion. --- Punishment - Public opinion. --- Public opinion - Illinois - Chicago. --- Penalties (Criminal law) --- Philosophy&delete& --- Justice, Administration of - Public opinion --- Law - Public opinion - Philosophy --- Punishment - - Public opinion --- Public opinion - - Chicago - Illinois --- -Justice, Administration of --- -Sociology of law
Choose an application
Should public opinion determine-or even influence-sentencing policy and practice? Should the punishment of criminal offenders reflect what the public regards as appropriate? These deceptively simple questions conceal complex theoretical and methodological challenges to the administration of punishment. In the West, politicians have often answered these questions in the affirmative; penal reforms have been justified with direct reference to the attitudes of the public. This is why the contention that politicians should bridge the gap between the public and criminal justice practice has widespread resonance. Criminal law scholars, for their part, have often been more reluctant to accept public input in penal practice, and some have even held that the idea of consulting public opinion constitutes a populist approach to punishment. The purpose of this book is to examine the moral significance of public opinion for penal theory and practice. For the first time in a single volume the editors, Jesper Ryberg and Julian V. Roberts, have assembled a number of respected criminologists, philosphers, and legal theorists to address the various aspects of why and how public opinion should be reflected in the way the criminal justice system deals with criminals. The chapters address the myriad complexities surrounding this issue by first weighing the justifications for incorporating public views into punishment practices and then considering the various ways this might be achieved through juries, prosecutors, restoratifve justice programs, and other means
Political philosophy. Social philosophy --- Philosophy and psychology of culture --- Legal theory and methods. Philosophy of law --- Sociology of culture --- Criminal liability --- Punishment --- Sentences (Criminal procedure) --- Sentencing --- Correctional law --- Criminal procedure --- Judgments, Criminal --- Penalties (Criminal law) --- Penology --- Corrections --- Impunity --- Retribution --- Accountability, Criminal --- Criminal accountability --- Criminal responsibility --- Liability, Criminal --- Responsibility, Criminal --- Liability (Law) --- Public opinion --- Law and legislation --- Public opinion. --- Punishment - Public opinion. --- Criminal liability - Public opinion. --- Sentences (Criminal procedure) - Public opinion.
Choose an application
Law --- Justice, Administration of --- Punishment --- Public opinion --- Philosophy --- Public opinion. --- psychologie --- gedrag --- psychologie, sociaal --- sociologie --- #SBIB:324H60 --- 316.334.4 --- Opinion, Public --- Perception, Public --- Popular opinion --- Public perception --- Public perceptions --- Judgment --- Social psychology --- Attitude (Psychology) --- Focus groups --- Reputation --- Acts, Legislative --- Enactments, Legislative --- Laws (Statutes) --- Legislative acts --- Legislative enactments --- Jurisprudence --- Legislation --- Administration of justice --- Courts --- Penalties (Criminal law) --- Penology --- Corrections --- Impunity --- Retribution --- 316.334.4 Rechtssociologie --- Rechtssociologie --- Philosophy&delete& --- Politieke socialisatie --- Law and legislation --- Law - Philosophy - Public opinion --- Justice, Administration of - Public opinion --- Punishment - Public opinion --- Public opinion - Illinois - Chicago --- Droit --- Justice --- Peines --- Opinion publique --- Philosophie --- Opinion publique. --- Administration --- Psychologie du droit --- Psychological aspects. --- Aspect psychologique.
Choose an application
Sentences (Criminal procedure) --- Punishment --- Criminal justice, Administration of --- Crime --- Populism. --- Political science --- City crime --- Crime and criminals --- Crimes --- Delinquency --- Felonies --- Misdemeanors --- Urban crime --- Social problems --- Criminal law --- Criminals --- Criminology --- Transgression (Ethics) --- Administration of criminal justice --- Justice, Administration of --- Penalties (Criminal law) --- Penology --- Corrections --- Impunity --- Retribution --- Sentencing --- Correctional law --- Criminal procedure --- Judgments, Criminal --- Public opinion. --- Government policy --- Social aspects --- Law and legislation --- Public attitudes --- Criminal justice system analysis --- Penal law --- Penal policy --- International comparisons --- Populism --- Public opinion --- Government policy&delete& --- Sentences (Criminal procedure) - Public opinion --- Punishment - Public opinion --- Criminal justice, Administration of - Public opinion --- Crime - Government policy - Public opinion --- Sentences (procédure pénale) --- Peines --- Justice pénale --- Crime organisé --- Government policy. --- Opinion publique. --- Administration. --- Sentences (procédure pénale) --- Justice pénale --- Crime organisé
Choose an application
This investigation of five Western criminal justice systems reveals startling similarities in recent sentencing policies. The authors contend that a trend of penal populism - criminal justice policies designed to appeal to the public appetite for retribution - has done little to reduce crime.
Sentences (Criminal procedure) --- Crime --- Punishment --- Crime in mass media --- Public opinion --- Opinion, Public --- Perception, Public --- Popular opinion --- Public perception --- Public perceptions --- Crime and criminals in mass media --- Penalties (Criminal law) --- Penology --- City crime --- Crime and criminals --- Crimes --- Delinquency --- Felonies --- Misdemeanors --- Urban crime --- Sentencing --- Social aspects --- Judgment --- Social psychology --- Attitude (Psychology) --- Focus groups --- Reputation --- Mass media --- Corrections --- Impunity --- Retribution --- Social problems --- Criminal justice, Administration of --- Criminal law --- Criminals --- Criminology --- Transgression (Ethics) --- Correctional law --- Criminal procedure --- Judgments, Criminal --- Sentencias (Proseso penal) --- Delincuencia --- Penas (Derecho) --- Castigos (Derecho) --- Pena (Derecho) --- Penología --- Derecho penal --- Amnistía --- Indulto --- Conducta delictiva --- Crimen --- Criminalidad --- Crímenes --- Delitos --- Problemas sociales --- Criminología --- Opinión pública --- Estudios transculturales --- Cross-cultural studies --- Public opinion&delete& --- Cross-cultural studies. --- Sentences (Criminal procedure) - Public opinion - Cross-cultural studies --- Crime - Public opinion - Cross-cultural studies --- Punishment - Public opinion - Cross-cultural studies --- Crime in mass media - Cross-cultural studies --- Public opinion - Cross-cultural studies
Choose an application
Sentences (Criminal procedure) --- Punishment --- Public opinion --- Sentences (Procédure pénale) --- Peines --- Opinion publique --- Cross-cultural studies --- Etudes transculturelles --- Cross-cultural studies. --- 343.15 --- -Punishment --- -Sentences (Criminal procedure) --- -Sentencing --- Correctional law --- Criminal procedure --- Judgments, Criminal --- Penalties (Criminal law) --- Penology --- Corrections --- Impunity --- Retribution --- Opinion, Public --- Perception, Public --- Popular opinion --- Public perception --- Public perceptions --- Judgment --- Social psychology --- Attitude (Psychology) --- Focus groups --- Reputation --- Strafrechtelijke uitspraak en rechtsmiddelen. Uitvoering van het vonnis. Kracht van gewijsde. Uitvoering van straf. Vrijspraak. Voorziening in beroep, in cassatie. Herziening van proces --- -Cross-cultural studies --- -Strafrechtelijke uitspraak en rechtsmiddelen. Uitvoering van het vonnis. Kracht van gewijsde. Uitvoering van straf. Vrijspraak. Voorziening in beroep, in cassatie. Herziening van proces --- 343.15 Strafrechtelijke uitspraak en rechtsmiddelen. Uitvoering van het vonnis. Kracht van gewijsde. Uitvoering van straf. Vrijspraak. Voorziening in beroep, in cassatie. Herziening van proces --- -343.15 Strafrechtelijke uitspraak en rechtsmiddelen. Uitvoering van het vonnis. Kracht van gewijsde. Uitvoering van straf. Vrijspraak. Voorziening in beroep, in cassatie. Herziening van proces --- Sentencing --- Sentences (Procédure pénale) --- Public opinion&delete& --- Sentences (Criminal procedure) - Public opinion - Cross-cultural studies. --- Punishment - Public opinion - Cross-cultural studies. --- Public opinion - Cross-cultural studies.
Listing 1 - 6 of 6 |
Sort by
|