Listing 1 - 2 of 2 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
[2e éd.] Les Cours et tribunaux se réfèrent habituellement à la théorie de l’abus de droit et à la nécessité de la proportionnalité pour sanctionner la grève considérée comme abusive ou disproportionnée. Cet ouvrage cerne de plus près le concept de proportionnalité évoqué par certains et ensuite le principe de proportionnalité évoqué par d’autres en vue de voir si ces instruments peuvent justifier de manière cohérente certaines limites du droit de grève.Il traite du conflit permanent entre ceux qui exercent ce qui est aujourd’hui reconnu comme un « droit », le droit de grève, et ceux qui le subissent et qui peuvent faire valoir d’autres droits de valeur. L’auteur se préoccupe de savoir si le principe de proportionnalité en tant que mode de résolution des conflits peut donner une solution satisfaisante à ce conflit entre les différents droits en abordant non pas les aspects sociologiques de la grève mais exclusivement les aspects juridiques
Social law. Labour law --- Droit de grève --- Grève [Droit de ] --- Principe de proportionnalité --- Proportion (Droit) --- Proportionaliteit (Recht) --- Proportionality in law --- Proportionnalité (Droit européen) --- Proportionnalité (Droit) --- Right to strike --- Stakingsrecht --- Strike [Right to ] --- Strikes and lockouts --- Grèves et lock-out --- Law and legislation --- Droit --- Grèves et lock-out --- Proportionnalité (Droit) --- EPUB-ALPHA-D EPUB-LIV-FT LIVDROIT STRADA-B --- Belgium --- European Union countries --- Belgique
Choose an application
"There are few concepts in international law that captivate the mind and cause bitter debates as much as the application of the principle of proportionality in contemporary armed conflict. As conflicts are increasingly fought in urban settings, the concept of proportionality plays a crucial role in the protection of civilians from the horrors of war. This book is a study of proportionality as it is currently understood in the laws of armed conflict-also known as international humanitarian law (IHL). The principle of proportionality is one of the cornerstones of IHL, together with the other basic principles of distinction between civilians and combatants, the prohibition on the infliction of unnecessary suffering, the notion of military necessity, and the principle of humanity. Although proportionality is notoriously opaque and can seem a topic for theoreticians, the real-world impact of this principle and its interpretation is very concrete. States, and their armed forces, treat it as a serious limitation on their military activity. There are many reasons for the prominence of the principle of proportionality, especially, as Thomas Franck explained, its hold on the "imagination of the epistemic community in which it is used as the prism for viewing, arguing, and ultimately resolving disputes." It is, perhaps, useful to present the principle of proportionality in the context of two other cardinal principles of IHL: the principles of necessity and of distinction. According to these, only combatants and military objectives may be targeted during armed conflicts. The attacking party must ascertain whether a given target is military or civilian, and refrain from attacking the latter. The principle of proportionality adds a further constraint to the principle of distinction. Even if the target is a military objective, attacking it is prohibited if it is expected to cause incidental harm to civilians "which would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated." For example, while civilian buildings cannot be attacked during a military operation, a building which is housing a group of soldiers can be attacked, because this makes it a military objective. However, the principle of proportionality place limits on how and when this building may be attacked. It is prohibited to attack the building if it is known that a large number of civilians either in the building or in its vicinity would be harmed, even if unintentionally, to an extent that this harm ("collateral damage") would be excessive relative to the military advantage gained by the attack. Thus, distinction and proportionality impose two cumulative conditions which must both be fulfilled in order for an attack to be lawful. Both principles limit the freedom of operation and the discretion of the belligerent parties, and thereby play an important role in protecting civilians from the vicissitudes of armed conflict"
Humanitarian law --- Proportionality in law --- Humanitarian law. --- Proportionality in law. --- Humanitarian conventions --- International humanitarian law --- War (International law) --- Law --- Droit humanitaire. --- Proportionnalité (droit) --- Principe de proportionnalité --- Proportion (droit) --- Proportionnalité (droit européen) --- Proportionnalité (morale) --- Principes généraux du droit européen --- Raisonnabilité (droit) --- Conflits de droits fondamentaux --- Proportionnalité des délits et des peines --- Droit européen --- Ordre public --- Pouvoir réglementaire --- Conventions de Genève --- Conventions humanitaires --- Droit humanitaire international --- Droit international humanitaire --- Droits de l'homme dans les conflits armés --- Commissions d'enquête internationales --- Droit à l'eau (droit international) --- Croix-Rouge --- Secours aux militaires blessés ou malades en temps de guerre --- Victimes de guerre --- Groupes armés non-étatiques --- Nécessité militaire --- Responsabilité de protéger (droit international) --- Combattants et non-combattants (droit international) --- Droit d'ingérence humanitaire --- Guerre --- Prisonniers de guerre --- Droits de l'homme (droit international) --- Guerre (droit international) --- Statut juridique --- Protection des civils --- Law of armed conflicts. Humanitarian law --- Droit humanitaire --- Proportionnalité (droit)
Listing 1 - 2 of 2 |
Sort by
|