Listing 1 - 3 of 3 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
The results of new direct price level comparisons across 148 countries in 2005 have led to large revisions of purchasing power parity exchanges rates, particularly for China and India. The recalculation of international and global inequalities, using the new purchasing power parity rates, shows that inequalities are substantially higher than previously thought. Inequality between global citizens is estimated at 70 Gini points rather than 65 as before. The richest decile receives 57 percent of global income rather than 50 percent.
Average income --- Consumption expenditures --- Country dummies --- Country regressions --- Developed economies --- Developing countries --- Economic Theory and Research --- Emerging Markets --- Empirical studies --- Equity and Development --- Gini coefficient --- Growth rate --- Growth rates --- Household surveys --- Income --- Income levels --- Inequality --- Macroeconomics and Economic Growth --- Mean incomes --- Policy research --- Poverty headcount --- Poverty Impact Evaluation --- Poverty line --- Poverty Reduction --- Power parity --- Private Sector Development --- Real growth
Choose an application
The results of new direct price level comparisons across 148 countries in 2005 have led to large revisions of purchasing power parity exchanges rates, particularly for China and India. The recalculation of international and global inequalities, using the new purchasing power parity rates, shows that inequalities are substantially higher than previously thought. Inequality between global citizens is estimated at 70 Gini points rather than 65 as before. The richest decile receives 57 percent of global income rather than 50 percent.
Average income --- Consumption expenditures --- Country dummies --- Country regressions --- Developed economies --- Developing countries --- Economic Theory and Research --- Emerging Markets --- Empirical studies --- Equity and Development --- Gini coefficient --- Growth rate --- Growth rates --- Household surveys --- Income --- Income levels --- Inequality --- Macroeconomics and Economic Growth --- Mean incomes --- Policy research --- Poverty headcount --- Poverty Impact Evaluation --- Poverty line --- Poverty Reduction --- Power parity --- Private Sector Development --- Real growth
Choose an application
The poor in Bangladesh are more likely to belong to households with a larger number of dependents and lower education among household members, be engaged in daily wage labor, own little land, and be less likely to receive remittances. This poverty profile for 2005 is similar to the profile in the mid-1980s and hence at first glance it would appear that little has changed over time. A closer look at national household survey data suggests a more nuanced story. This paper uses the latest two rounds of the Bangladesh Household Income and Expenditure Survey to decompose the micro-determinants of poverty reduction between 2000 and 2005, closely following a similar analysis using five earlier rounds of the Survey. The comparison of results shows that the spatial distribution of poverty seen in earlier decades has changed with time and the drivers of poverty reduction are different in several respects.
Access to Finance --- Correlates of poverty --- Economic growth --- Finance and Financial Sector Development --- Household consumption --- Household income --- Household survey --- Household welfare --- Inequality --- Macroeconomics and Economic Growth --- Measures --- Per capita consumption --- Poor --- Poor people --- Poverty --- Poverty gap --- Poverty headcount rates --- Poverty line --- Poverty profile --- Poverty Reduction --- Regional Economic Development --- Rural --- Rural areas --- Rural Poverty Reduction --- Sanitation --- Small Area Estimation Poverty Mapping
Listing 1 - 3 of 3 |
Sort by
|