Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

April 2000 - In Latvia, only 1.5 percent of households receive social assistance, which for those households represents 20 percent of income. The allocation of social assistance is unequal. Urban households outside the capital (Riga) and those headed by male adults are systematically discriminated against. Because social assistance is locally financed, poor households in different parts of the country are treated unequally. Milanovic assesses the performance of Latvia's system of social transfers, in three ways: First, he analyzes the incidence (who receives transfers) of pensions, family allowances, unemployment benefits, and social assistance. Per capita analysis shows pensions tending to be pro-rich and families allowances pro-poor (a finding typical in poverty analyses). Introducing an equivalence scale alters the results and shows all individual cash transfers performing about the same: mildly pro-poor. Next, he examines the performance of social assistance, which is, by definition, directed to the poor. He shows that Latvia's current system is concentrated - meaning that social assistance is disbursed to few households (only 1.5 percent of all households receive it) but among those that do receive it, it represents a relatively high share (20 percent) of income. Households that are systematically discriminated against in the allocation of social assistance are urban households living outside the capital (Riga) and those headed by male adults. Third, he looks at the regional allocation of social assistance. The results confirm earlier findings of large horizontal inequalities - that people with the same income from different parts of the country are treated unequally, because the existing system is based on local financing of social assistance. This paper - a product of Poverty and Human Resources, Development Research Group - is part of the Latvia Poverty Assistance Report (February 2000). The author may be contacted at bmilanovic@worldbank.org.

Cash Transfers --- Finance and Financial Sector Development --- Financial Literacy --- Household Budget --- Household Per Capita Income --- Household Survey --- Income --- Income Distribution --- Insurance --- Poor --- Poor Households --- Poor Individuals --- Poverty --- Poverty Alleviation --- Poverty Assessments --- Poverty Impact Evaluation --- Poverty Line --- Poverty Reduction --- Rural Development --- Rural Poverty Reduction --- Services and Transfers to Poor --- Social Assistance --- Targeting --- Transfers --- Transfers In Kind --- Transition Economies --- Unemployment

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

April 2000 - In Latvia, only 1.5 percent of households receive social assistance, which for those households represents 20 percent of income. The allocation of social assistance is unequal. Urban households outside the capital (Riga) and those headed by male adults are systematically discriminated against. Because social assistance is locally financed, poor households in different parts of the country are treated unequally. Milanovic assesses the performance of Latvia's system of social transfers, in three ways: First, he analyzes the incidence (who receives transfers) of pensions, family allowances, unemployment benefits, and social assistance. Per capita analysis shows pensions tending to be pro-rich and families allowances pro-poor (a finding typical in poverty analyses). Introducing an equivalence scale alters the results and shows all individual cash transfers performing about the same: mildly pro-poor. Next, he examines the performance of social assistance, which is, by definition, directed to the poor. He shows that Latvia's current system is concentrated - meaning that social assistance is disbursed to few households (only 1.5 percent of all households receive it) but among those that do receive it, it represents a relatively high share (20 percent) of income. Households that are systematically discriminated against in the allocation of social assistance are urban households living outside the capital (Riga) and those headed by male adults. Third, he looks at the regional allocation of social assistance. The results confirm earlier findings of large horizontal inequalities - that people with the same income from different parts of the country are treated unequally, because the existing system is based on local financing of social assistance. This paper - a product of Poverty and Human Resources, Development Research Group - is part of the Latvia Poverty Assistance Report (February 2000). The author may be contacted at bmilanovic@worldbank.org.

Cash Transfers --- Finance and Financial Sector Development --- Financial Literacy --- Household Budget --- Household Per Capita Income --- Household Survey --- Income --- Income Distribution --- Insurance --- Poor --- Poor Households --- Poor Individuals --- Poverty --- Poverty Alleviation --- Poverty Assessments --- Poverty Impact Evaluation --- Poverty Line --- Poverty Reduction --- Rural Development --- Rural Poverty Reduction --- Services and Transfers to Poor --- Social Assistance --- Targeting --- Transfers --- Transfers In Kind --- Transition Economies --- Unemployment