Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Political science --- Republicanism --- Science politique --- Républicanisme --- History --- Histoire --- United States --- Etats-Unis --- Politics and government --- Politique et gouvernement --- History. --- Républicanisme --- Political science - United States - History - 18th century --- Republicanism - History --- Political science - Greece - History

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

History of North America --- anno 1700-1799 --- anno 1800-1899 --- Political science --- History --- United States --- Politics and government --- Civilization --- Greek influences --- Roman influences --- Political science - United States - History - 18th century - Congresses --- United States - Politics and government - 18th century - Congresses --- United States - Civilization - Greek influences - Congresses --- United States - Civilization - Roman influences - Congresses

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

What role did manhood play in early American Politics? In A Republic of Men, Mark E. Kann argues that the American founders aspired to create a "republic of men" but feared that "disorderly men" threatened its birth, health, and longevity. Kann demonstrates how hegemonic norms of manhood–exemplified by "the Family Man," for instance--were deployed as a means of stigmatizing unworthy men, rewarding responsible men with citizenship, and empowering exceptional men with positions of leadership and authority, while excluding women from public life. Kann suggests that the founders committed themselves in theory to the democratic proposition that all men were created free and equal and could not be governed without their own consent, but that they in no way believed that "all men" could be trusted with equal liberty, equal citizenship, or equal authority. The founders developed a "grammar of manhood" to address some difficult questions about public order. Were America's disorderly men qualified for citizenship? Were they likely to recognize manly leaders, consent to their authority, and defer to their wisdom? A Republic of Men compellingly analyzes the ways in which the founders used a rhetoric of manhood to stabilize American politics.

Men -- United States -- History -- 18th century. --- Patriarchy -- United States -- History -- 18th century. --- Political culture -- United States -- History -- 18th century. --- Political science -- United States -- History -- 18th century. --- Sex role -- United States -- History -- 18th century. --- Social role -- United States -- History -- 18th century. --- Political culture --- Political science --- Men --- Patriarchy --- Sex role --- Social role --- Government - U.S. --- Law, Politics & Government --- Political Institutions & Public Administration - U.S., General --- History --- Role, Social --- Gender role --- Androcracy --- Patriarchal families --- Human males --- Social psychology --- Social status --- Sex (Psychology) --- Sex differences (Psychology) --- Gender expression --- Sexism --- Fathers --- Families --- Male domination (Social structure) --- Patrilineal kinship --- Human beings --- Males --- Effeminacy --- Masculinity --- United States --- 18th century --- Role (Sociology) --- Gender roles --- Gendered role --- Gendered roles --- Role, Gender --- Role, Gendered --- Role, Sex --- Roles, Gender --- Roles, Gendered --- Roles, Sex --- Sex roles