Listing 1 - 3 of 3 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
"A critical look at the realities of community policing in South Los Angeles.The Limits of Community Policing addresses conflicts between police and communities. Luis Daniel Gascón and Aaron Roussell depart from traditional conceptions, arguing that community policing—popularized for decades as a racial panacea—is not the solution it seems to be.Tracing this policy back to its origins, they focus on the Los Angeles Police Department, which first introduced community policing after the high-profile Rodney King riots. Drawing on over sixty interviews with officers, residents, and stakeholders in South LA’s “Lakeside” precinct, they show how police tactics amplified—rather than resolved—racial tensions, complicating partnership efforts, crime response and prevention, and accountability.Gascón and Roussell shine a new light on the residents of this neighborhood to address the enduring—and frequently explosive—conflicts between police and communities. At a time when these issues have taken center stage, this volume offers a critical understanding of how community policing really works." -- Publisher's description.
Police --- Community policing --- Police-community relations --- African Americans --- Hispanic Americans --- Complaints against --- California --- Black studies. --- Latino studies. --- advocacy. --- civilian review boards. --- collaborative ethnography. --- collaborative governance. --- community governance. --- community policing. --- consumer capitalism. --- corporate sponsorship. --- crime prevention. --- genealogy. --- governmentality. --- grassroots activism. --- language differences. --- legality. --- liberalism. --- moral order. --- neighborhood disputes. --- pathologization. --- police accountability. --- police authority. --- police commission. --- police legitimacy. --- police workforce. --- policeability. --- postindustrial city. --- post–civil rights era. --- public complaints. --- public perceptions. --- public service. --- race relations. --- racial order. --- regulation. --- repression. --- responsibilization. --- riot commission. --- riot commissions. --- social change. --- social organization. --- street history. --- symbolic interaction. --- urban redevelopment. --- urban riots. --- urban sociology. --- urban studies.
Choose an application
An in-depth look at Qatar's migrant workers and the place of skill in the language of control and powerSkill—specifically the distinction between the “skilled” and “unskilled”—is generally defined as a measure of ability and training, but Does Skill Make Us Human? shows instead that skill distinctions are used to limit freedom, narrow political rights, and even deny access to imagination and desire. Natasha Iskander takes readers into Qatar’s booming construction industry in the lead-up to the 2022 World Cup, and through her unprecedented look at the experiences of migrant workers, she reveals that skill functions as a marker of social difference powerful enough to structure all aspects of social and economic life.Through unique access to construction sites in Doha, in-depth research, and interviews, Iskander explores how migrants are recruited, trained, and used. Despite their acquisition of advanced technical skills, workers are commonly described as unskilled and disparaged as “unproductive,” “poor quality,” or simply “bodies.” She demonstrates that skill categories adjudicate personhood, creating hierarchies that shape working conditions, labor recruitment, migration policy, the design of urban spaces, and the reach of global industries. Iskander also discusses how skill distinctions define industry responses to global warming, with employers recruiting migrants from climate-damaged places at lower wages and exposing these workers to Qatar’s extreme heat. She considers how the dehumanizing politics of skill might be undone through tactical solidarity and creative practices.With implications for immigrant rights and migrant working conditions throughout the world, Does Skill Make Us Human? examines the factors that justify and amplify inequality.
Foreign workers --- Legal status, laws, etc. --- Qatar. --- Absorptive capacity. --- Adviser. --- Affordance. --- Availability. --- Betterment. --- Bodily integrity. --- Citizenship. --- Coercion. --- Cognition. --- Cognitive model. --- Collective bargaining. --- Competence (human resources). --- Construction. --- Credibility. --- Design knowledge. --- Developed country. --- Effectiveness. --- Embodied cognition. --- Embodied imagination. --- Employment. --- Foreign worker. --- Guideline. --- Harry Braverman. --- Human Rights Watch. --- Human behavior. --- Human body. --- Human capital. --- Human resources. --- Human skin color. --- Identity document. --- Impressment. --- Income. --- Informant. --- Informational interview. --- Infrastructure. --- Inspection. --- Interdependence. --- Kafala system. --- Knowledge worker. --- Labor camp. --- Labor relations. --- Laborer. --- Labour power. --- Measures of national income and output. --- Migrant worker. --- Modern history. --- Motivation. --- Nationality. --- Obedience (human behavior). --- Occupational injury. --- Occupational safety and health. --- On Your Behalf. --- Ownership (psychology). --- Partnership. --- Payment. --- Personhood. --- Physical exercise. --- Plausible deniability. --- Pliers. --- Police accountability. --- Political status. --- Politics. --- Primary authority. --- Productivity. --- Profession. --- Prospecting. --- Quality control. --- Quality management system. --- Race (human categorization). --- Recruitment. --- Remuneration. --- Repatriation (humans). --- Responsiveness. --- Rework (electronics). --- Safety culture. --- Salary. --- Scaffolding. --- Scholarship. --- Skill. --- Skilled worker. --- Slavery. --- Social protection. --- State actor. --- Statistician. --- Subcontractor. --- Subjectivity. --- Supervisor. --- Surety. --- Symptom. --- Tool. --- Tradesman. --- Understanding. --- Unfree labour. --- Wage. --- Welder. --- Welfare. --- Well-being. --- Workforce development. --- Workforce.
Choose an application
No detailed description available for "The Minneapolis Reckoning".
Police --- Police brutality --- Police administration --- Black lives matter movement. --- Citizen participation. --- African American. --- Agape. --- Behavioral Crisis Response. --- Better Police Contract. --- Black America. --- Black Americans. --- Black Lives. --- Black Northsiders. --- Black Panther Party. --- Black Power. --- Black Visions. --- Brooklyn Center. --- Castile. --- Charter Commission. --- Civil Rights Act. --- Civil War. --- Civilian Police Accountability Council. --- Communities United Against Police Brutality (CUAPB). --- Councilmember Cunningham. --- Cup Foods. --- Dakota. --- Democrats. --- Ferguson. --- George Floyd Square (GFS). --- George Floyd. --- Hennepin County. --- Hispanic. --- Hmong American. --- Hmong. --- Human Rights. --- Imani. --- Indigenous. --- Jewish. --- MAD DADS. --- MPD. --- Michelle Phelps. --- Minneapolis City Council. --- Minneapolis Police Department. --- Minneapolis Public School. --- Minneapolis Reckoning. --- Minnesota Department of Human Rights (MDHR). --- Minnesota Supreme Court. --- Murderapolis. --- National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP). --- National Guard. --- North Minneapolis. --- Office of Police Conduct Review (OPCR). --- Office of Violence Prevention (OVP). --- Plymouth Avenue. --- Police Conduct Oversight Commission. --- Policing the Progressive City: Race, Violence, and the Politics of Policing in America. --- Powderhorn Park. --- Relationships Evolving Possibilities (REP). --- Republican. --- Senate. --- South Minneapolis. --- Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT). --- Star Tribune. --- Twin Cities Coalition for Justice for Jamar (TCC4J). --- World War. --- crime. --- inequality. --- local politics. --- pandemic. --- policepolice reform, police abolition, police violence, politics of policing, Minneapolis Police Department. --- race. --- racial justice. --- racism. --- urban inequality. --- violence.
Listing 1 - 3 of 3 |
Sort by
|