Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Parent and child (Law) --- Đ 9601 --- -Parent and child (Law) --- Parent and child (Law) - Great Britain.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

A tension lies at the heart of family law. Expressed in the language of rights and duties, it seeks to impose enforceable obligations on individuals linked to each other by ties that are usually regarded as based on love or blood. Taking a contextual approach that draws on history, sociology and social policy as well as law and legal theory, this book examines the concept of obligation as it has been developed in family law and the difficulties the law has had in translating it from a theoretical and ideological concept into the basis of enforceable actions and duties. Increasingly, the idea of commitment has been offered as the key organising principle for the recognition of family relationships, often as a means of rebutting claims that family ties are becoming attenuated, but the meaning and scope of this concept have not been explored. The book traces how the notion of commitment is understood and how far it has come to be used as a rationale for imposing the core legal obligations which underpin care and caring within families

Domestic relations --- Family policy --- Parent and child (Law) --- Domestic relations - Great Britain --- Parent and child (Law) - Great Britain --- Family policy - Great Britain --- Royaume-Uni

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

"This book argues that the legal understanding of 'family' in the UK continues to be underpinned by the idealised image of the 'nuclear family', premised upon the traditional, gendered roles of 'father as breadwinner' and 'mother as homemaker'. This examination of the law's model of the 'family' has been prompted by the substantial reforms that have taken place in family law in recent decades, and the significant evolution in social attitudes and familial practices that has occurred in parallel.Throughout the book, the influence of the nuclear family is noted in several different contexts: various specific legal definitions of 'family', the legal regulation of adult, conjugal relationships, the attribution of legal parenthood and the construction of the role of the 'parent' within the law. Ultimately, this book argues that while these reforms have resulted in additional categories of relationship coming to be situated within the nuclear family model, there has not, as yet, been any fundamental alteration of the underpinning concept of the nuclear family itself.This book concludes by considering the possibilities offered beyond the 'nuclear family'; exploring the reconceptualising of the legal understanding of 'family' around alternative and potentially 'radical' models of 'family'."

Domestic relations --- Husband and wife --- Nuclear families --- Parent and child (Law) --- Domestic relations - Great Britain --- Parent and child (Law) - Great Britain --- Husband and wife - Great Britain --- Nuclear families - Great Britain --- Royaume-Uni

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

"The question of whether and how decisions are made in respect of a child's medical treatment has become a matter of significant public controversy following the highly publicised cases of Charlie Gard (Great Ormond Street Hospital v Yates [2017]) and Alfie Evans (Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust v Evans et al [2018]). In light of this background, this timely collection brings together commentators from law, medical ethics and clinical medicine, actively drawing on the view from the clinic as well as philosophical, legal and sociological perspectives on the crucial question of who should decide about the fate of a child suffering from a serious illness. In particular, the collection looks at whether the current 'best interests' threshold is the appropriate boundary for legal intervention, or whether it is appropriate to adopt the 'risk of significant harm' approach proposed in Yates. Moreover, it explores the respective roles of parents, doctors and the courts and the possible risks of inappropriate state intrusion in parental decision-making, and how we might address them"

Children with disabilities - Medical care - Law and legislation - Great Britain --- Parent and child (Law) - Great Britain --- Euthanasia - Law and legislation - Great Britain --- Royaume-Uni --- Medicine: general issues --- parental rights; philosophical perspectives; child; serious illness; legal perspectives; sociological perspectives --- Children with disabilities --- Parent and child (Law) --- Euthanasia