Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Heidegger is the only thinker of his generation whose philosophy of technology is still widely read today. In it, he made three basic claims. First, he asserted that the essence of technology is not technological--that technology is not a neutral instrumentality. Second, he claimed that there is a qualitative difference between modern and traditional technologies. Third and most interestingly, he claimed that technology is a metaphysical perspective, a paradigmatic view of the whole of nature. Although Martin Heidegger remains recognized as a founder of the philosophy of technology, in the last sixty years a whole new world of technologies has appeared—bio-, nano-, info-, and imaging. With technology, time moves fast. Does philosophical time move, too? How adequate is Heidegger’s thinking now for understanding today’s technological advances? After an extensive Introduction that places Heidegger within the thinking about technology typical of his time, the author, a prominent philosopher of technology, reexamines Heidegger’s positions from multiple perspectives—historical, pragmatic, anti-Romantic and postphenomenological. His critiques invert Heidegger’s essentialism and phenomenologically analyze Heidegger’s favored and disfavored technologies. In conclusion, he undertakes a concrete analysis of the technologies Heidegger used to produce his writing and discovers heretofore undiscussed and ironic results. Overall, the book not only serves as an excellent introduction Heidegger’s philosophy of technology and a corrective in outlining its limitations, it indicates a postphenomenological counter-strategy for technological analysis, one that would look at the production of technology in practice, based on observing its forms of embodied activity.

PHILOSOPHY / Movements / Phenomenology

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Jean-Luc Marion: The Essential Writings is the first anthology of this major contemporary philosopher’s writings. It spans his entire career as a historian of philosophy, as a theologian, and as a theoretician of “saturated phenomena.” The editor’s long general Introduction situates Marion in the history of modern philosophy, especially phenomenology, and shorter introductions preface each section of the anthology. The entire volume will enable professors to teach Marion by assigning a single book, and the editor’s introductions will make it possible for students to learn enough about phenomenology to read Marion without having to take preliminary courses in Husserl and Heidegger.

PHILOSOPHY / Movements / Phenomenology

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Die Rhythmisch-melodischen Studien (1912) zählen zu den bedeutendsten Werken von Eduard Sievers. Eine besondere Wirkung hatten sie in Russland, wo sie russische Formalisten, wie Viktor Šklovskij, Osip Brik und Jurij Tynjanov, beeindruckten. Unsere Neuausgabe, knapp hundert Jahre nach der Erstveröffentlichung, dient vor allem einem erleichterten Zugang zu diesen oft-zitierten aber schwer verfügbaren und inzwischen selten gelesenen Texten.

Biography & Autobiography --- Philosophy / Movements / Phenomenology

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Jean-Luc Marion's theory of saturated phenomena is one of the most exciting developments in phenomenology in recent decades. It opens up new possibilities for understanding phenomena by beginning from rich and complex examples such as revelation and works of art. Rather than being curiosities or exceptions, these "excessive" or "saturated" phenomena are, in Marion's view, paradigms. He understands more straightforward phenomena, such as the objects of the natural sciences, as reduced and impoverished versions of the excess given in saturated phenomena. Interpreting Excess is a systematic and comprehensive study of Marion's texts on saturated phenomena and their place in his wider phenomenology of givenness, tracing both his theory and his examples across a wide range of texts spanning three decades. The author argues that a rich hermeneutics is implicit in Marion's examples of saturated phenomena but is not set out in his theory. This hermeneutics makes clear that attempts to overthrow the much-criticized sovereignty of the Cartesian ego will remain unsuccessful if they simply reverse the subject-object relation by speaking of phenomena imposing themselves with an overwhelming givenness on a recipient. Instead, phenomena should be understood as appearing in a hermeneutic space already opened by a subject's active reception. Thus, a phenomenon's appearing depends not only on its givenness but also on the way it is interpreted by the receiving subject. All phenomenology is, therefore, necessarily hermeneutic. Interpreting Excess provides an indispensable guide for any study of Marion's saturated phenomena. It is also a significant contribution to ongoing debates about philosophical ways of thinking about God, the relation between hermeneutics and phenomenology, and philosophy "after the subject."

PHILOSOPHY / Movements / Phenomenology --- Marion, Jean-Luc --- Marion, J.-L.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Brings a new dimension to thinking about philosophical materialism and realism in the wake of phenomenology and deconstructionChallenges speculative realism’s critique of contemporary Continental philosophy as correlationismUses Merleau-Ponty and Nancy to develop an ontology that respects the materiality and exteriority of what exists without reinstating the mind–world divideShows how Merleau-Ponty and Nancy overcome the Cartesian presupposition at work in current realist appeal to step out of our own thoughts to reach the ‘great outdoors’Provides an alternative to the phenomenological reduction of being to senseDefends anthropomorphism as a way of overcoming the Cartesian–Sartrian ontology of the objectMarie-Eve Morin proposes a reinterpretation of the philosophy of Merleau-Ponty and Nancy from the perspective of realist and object-oriented tendencies in contemporary philosophy. The realist critique of subject-centred anthropocentric thinking indicates the danger, inherent in the phenomenological approach, of reducing being to sense. Morin demonstrates how Merleau-Ponty and Nancy avoid this pitfall through the development of ontologies that respect the materiality and exteriority of what exists without reaffirming the Cartesian divide between mind and world.Morin orients her analysis around three ideas where Merleau-Ponty’s and Nancy’s thinking intersect: Body, Thing, Being. Each time, she tracks the role of difference or spacing within sensing and sense-making. She concludes that their respective conceptions – as encroachment and promiscuity or as unpassable limit – may provide counterweights to each other.

Ontology. --- Phenomenology. --- Philosophy, French --- PHILOSOPHY / Movements / Phenomenology. --- Philosophy, Modern --- Being --- Philosophy --- Metaphysics --- Necessity (Philosophy) --- Substance (Philosophy)