Listing 1 - 7 of 7 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Animal. --- Animals. --- Enrichment. --- Environmental enrichment. --- Number of animals. --- Variation.
Choose an application
Appropriate education and training of all those engaged in the use of live vertebrate animals far scientific purposes is required by both the Council of Europe (Convention ETS 123, Article 26) and the European Union (Council Directive 86/609/EEC, Article 14).FELASA has elaborated these requirements in practical detail, for this purpose dividing those involved into 4 Categories (although these Categories need not be mutually exclusive): Category A-persons taking care of animals; Category B-persons carrying out animal experiments; Category C-persons responsible for directing animal experiments; Category D-laboratory animal science specialists.FELASA has based its recommendations on functions-which are common to all, rather than on nomenclature-which differs from country to country. The teaching syllabus published here in detail for Category C provides a common basis for other Categories where functions are similar, while the section 'Animal care/husbandry' of Category A Level 1 should satisfy the requirement of Article 14 of the Directive that 'persons carrying out or supervising the conduct of experiments' (Categories B and C) 'shall... be capable of handling and taking care of laboratory animals'. Practical, theoretical and ethical aspects should be treated for all Categories. Refinement of techniques, reduction in the number of animals used and replacement wherever possible by non-sentient systems should be guiding principles.The FELASA recommendations for Categories A and C are presented here. Those for Categories B and D are to follow
Animal. --- Animals. --- Care. --- Education. --- Europe. --- Experiment. --- Experiments. --- Function. --- Group. --- Handling. --- Laboratory animals. --- Laboratory-animals. --- Laboratory. --- Level. --- Management. --- Need. --- Number of animals. --- Purpose. --- Reduction. --- Refinement. --- Replacement. --- System. --- Systems. --- Training.
Choose an application
The provision of a socialisation and training programme for dogs can lead to an improvement in the quality of the data that are produced from scientific procedures, and also to an improvement in animal welfare. A reduction in the number of animals needed to produce statistically significant data can result from decreasing the variability of the experimental data. The effects of a dog's behaviour can be a major source of random variability. A well socialised, habituated and trained dog should be calm during experimental procedures and, for example, during an ECG measurement, thus providing good quality data. A fearful, poorly socialised dog may also appear to be well-behaved on an examination table, and during an ECG measurement, because of the freezing response. However, there is likely to be a difference in the level of stress that these two individuals experience during the procedures. The stress response can have an impact on vital physiological parameters, such as heart rate. The variability in these parameters and the behaviour exhibited within a group of socialised, habituated and trained dogs that have been well prepared for experimental procedures, should be less than the variability present within a similar group of dogs that have not been prepared for these procedures. This paper describes two socialisation programmes, which were designed in order to compare the heart rates and behaviour of dogs which had received different degrees of socialisation, habituation and training. The behaviour of small groups of dogs from this study was compared with that of dogs on a standard socialisation programme, by using a simple, reproducible behavioural score scheme. The heart rate of the dogs was also measured. The results showed that there was little difference in heart rate between the groups, but that there were significant differences in the scores for key behaviours. There was evidence of a decrease in the variability of the behavioural scores for the groups of
Animal welfare. --- Animal-welfare. --- Animal. --- Animals. --- Behaviour. --- Dog. --- Dogs. --- Ecg. --- Experience. --- Group. --- Habituation. --- Heart rate. --- Heart-rate. --- Level. --- Number of animals. --- Paper. --- Parameters. --- Periods. --- Physiological. --- Provision. --- Quality. --- Reduction. --- Response. --- Socialisation. --- Stress response. --- Stress-response. --- Stress. --- Training. --- Variability. --- Welfare.
Choose an application
Environmental enrichment strategies are usually regarded as refinement. However, when the welfare of animals is enhanced through successful enrichment programmes, a reduction in the number of animals needed can be expected, because fewer animals might be lost during the course of experiments. Several examples of studies where enrichment can lead to reduction will be presented. They include the beneficial effects of nesting material for laboratory mice, the effects of husbandry procedures on controlling aggressive behaviour in male laboratory mice, and the effects of enrichment on variation in the results of experiments
Aggressive-behavior. --- Aggressive. --- Animal. --- Animals. --- Behaviour. --- Enrichment. --- Environmental enrichment. --- Experiment. --- Experiments. --- Husbandry. --- Laboratory mice. --- Laboratory. --- Male. --- Mice. --- Modulation. --- Nesting material. --- Number of animals. --- Preferences. --- Reduction. --- Refinement. --- Strategies. --- Strategy. --- Variation. --- Welfare.
Choose an application
Environmental enrichment strategies are usually regarded as refinement. However, when the welfare of animals is enhanced through successful enrichment programmes, a reduction in the number of animals needed can be expected, because fewer animals might be lost during the course of experiments. Several examples of studies where enrichment can lead to reduction will be presented. They include the beneficial effects of nesting material for laboratory mice, the effects of husbandry procedures on controlling aggressive behaviour in male laboratory mice, and the effects of enrichment on variation in the results of experiments
Aggressive-behavior. --- Aggressive. --- Animal. --- Animals. --- Behaviour. --- Enrichment. --- Environmental enrichment. --- Experiment. --- Experiments. --- Husbandry. --- Laboratory mice. --- Laboratory. --- Male laboratory mice. --- Male. --- Mice. --- Modulation. --- Nesting material. --- Number of animals. --- Preferences. --- Reduction. --- Refinement. --- Strategies. --- Strategy. --- Time. --- Variation. --- Welfare.
Choose an application
Blood samples were collected at 14 weeks of age (white blood cells (WBC), red blood cells (RBC), haemoglobin (HGB), and haematocrit (HCT) were analysed). At 15 weeks of age, the animals were euthanized by CO2 in their home cages, and final body weight and organ weights (heart, liver, kidney, adrenal, spleen and uterus) were recorded immediately.Although nearly all the test variables were not affected by environmental enrichment in their mean values, the enriched group showed higher coefficients of variation in many variables, and strain differences of both housing conditions were not consistent. The influences of enrichment were shown to be strain- and test-dependent. Such effects may lead to an increase in the number of animals which is necessary or may change the experimental results, especially when a study, using enriched housing conditions, focuses on strain differences.Since the same enrichment design can result in different influences, a positive or a negative or no adverse 'effect, due to the strain and the variables studied, researchers need to collect more information before enrichment designs are introduced into experimental plans Currently, environmental enrichment is a very common means of improving animal wellbeing, especially for laboratory animals. Although environmental enrichment seems to be a possible way for improving the well-being of animals, the consideration of housing laboratory animals should not only focus solely on animal well-being, manpower and economics but also on the precision and accuracy of the experimental results. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effects of enriched cages (nest box, nesting material, climbing bar) on body weight, haematological data and final organ weights.BALB/c, C57BL/6 and A/J mice, originated from Harlan Winkelmann, were used for the experiments-16 animals of each strain. Animals at 3 weeks of age were marked and separated randomly to enriched or non-enriched cages, in groups of four, half for each housing condition. Both cages were type III Makrolon cages, only the enriched cages contained a nest box, a wood bar for climbing and nesting material. Animals were kept in a clean animal room under specific pathogen free (SPF) conditions. Body weights were recorded every week.
Adrenal. --- Age. --- Animal. --- Animals. --- Behavior. --- Blood. --- Body weight. --- Body-weight. --- Boxes. --- Cage. --- Dba/2j. --- Design. --- Enriched. --- Enrichment. --- Environmental enrichment. --- Group. --- Haematocrit. --- Housing conditions. --- Housing. --- Inbred mice,strain differences,environmental enrichment,haematological analysis,organ weight. --- Increase. --- Kept. --- Laboratory animals. --- Laboratory mice. --- Laboratory-animals. --- Laboratory. --- Mice. --- Need. --- Nest box. --- Nest. --- Nesting material. --- Number of animals. --- Purpose. --- Rats. --- Rbc. --- Red blood cells. --- Strain differences. --- Stress. --- Test. --- Uterus. --- Variation. --- Weight. --- Well-being.
Choose an application
Enhancing the complexity of the environments of captive animals is often referred to as environmental enrichment and aims to have positive effects on the animals' well-being. Such enrichments may have consequences both for so-called 'normal' behaviour and for the pathophysiology of the animals in question. The effects of a lack of environmental complexity, including social isolation, on home cage behaviour and on pathophysiology in rats is considered in this review. Several preference tests on rats - choice tests and operant tests - indicate a preference for bedding, nesting material and social contact. Contradictory research results concerning the need for gnawing objects per se are more difficult to interpret and it is argued that excessive gnawing may be indicative of primary frustration and hence reduced welfare. One disadvantage of providing environmental enrichment to laboratory animals is a possible increase in subject variability, resulting in the need to use a greater number of test animals. However, this increased variability seems to be inconsistent and is not very well documented It is argued that in cases where the behavioural benefits of environmental enrichment justify the use of more animals, better welfare should be more highly valued than a reduction in the number of animals used
Animal welfare. --- Animal-welfare. --- Animal. --- Animals. --- Assessment. --- Bank voles. --- Bedding. --- Behaviour. --- Cage enrichment. --- Cage. --- Choice test. --- Choice. --- Consequences. --- Contact. --- Demand-functions. --- Enrichment. --- Environment. --- Environmental complexity. --- Environmental enrichment. --- Environments. --- Frustration. --- Housing conditions. --- Housing. --- Increase. --- Increased variability. --- Isolation. --- Laboratory animals. --- Laboratory-animals. --- Laboratory. --- Mice. --- Need. --- Nest-boxes. --- Nesting material. --- Number of animals. --- Object. --- Objects. --- Old. --- Operant. --- Pathophysiology. --- Preference test. --- Preference tests. --- Preference. --- Rat. --- Rats. --- Reduction. --- Research. --- Review. --- Risk assessment. --- Risk. --- Rodent. --- Rodents. --- Social contact. --- Social isolation. --- Social-isolation. --- Social. --- Test. --- Tests. --- Time. --- Variability. --- Welfare implications. --- Welfare. --- Well-being. --- Wistar rats.
Listing 1 - 7 of 7 |
Sort by
|