Listing 1 - 10 of 14 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
This paper analyzes the use of unconventional policy instruments in New Keynesian setups in which the ‘divine coincidence’ breaks down. The paper discusses the role of a second instrument and its coordination with conventional interest rate policy, and presents theoretical results on equilibrium determinacy, the inflation bias, the stabilization bias, and the optimal central banker’s preferences when both instruments are available. We show that the use of an unconventional instrument can help reduce the zone of equilibrium indeterminacy and the volatility of the economy. However, in some circumstances, committing not to use the second instrument may be welfare improving (a result akin to Rogoff (1985a) example of counterproductive coordination). We further show that the optimal central banker should be both aggressive against inflation, and interventionist in using the unconventional policy instrument. As long as price setting depends on expectations about the future, there are gains from establishing credibility by using any instrument that affects these expectations.
Banks and Banking --- Inflation --- Economic Theory --- Production and Operations Management --- Monetary Policy --- Central Banks and Their Policies --- Foreign Exchange --- Price Level --- Deflation --- Macroeconomics: Production --- Banks --- Depository Institutions --- Micro Finance Institutions --- Mortgages --- Neoclassical through 1925 (Austrian, Marshallian, Walrasian, Wicksellian) --- Financial Economics --- Macroeconomics --- Economic theory & philosophy --- Banking --- Output gap --- Neoclassical theory --- Financial frictions --- Prices --- Production --- Economic theory --- Banks and banking --- Neoclassical school of economics --- Economic forecasting
Choose an application
Since the beginning of the 1990s, foreign direct investment (FDI) in developing countries has increased dramatically. The distribution of FDI flows across these countries, however, is highly uneven; only a small number attract comparatively large amounts of foreign capital. This paper investigates whether the pattern of FDI flows can be explained by the standard neoclassical model or by modified versions of this model that allow for differences in production technologies across countries. The results suggest that the standard neoclassical approach is not particularly useful if we want to understand FDI flows to developing countries.
Exports and Imports --- Economic Theory --- Production and Operations Management --- International Investment --- Long-term Capital Movements --- Innovation --- Research and Development --- Technological Change --- Intellectual Property Rights: General --- Employment --- Unemployment --- Wages --- Intergenerational Income Distribution --- Aggregate Human Capital --- Aggregate Labor Productivity --- Neoclassical through 1925 (Austrian, Marshallian, Walrasian, Wicksellian) --- Finance --- Technology --- general issues --- International economics --- Macroeconomics --- Economic theory & philosophy --- Foreign direct investment --- Capital flows --- Capital productivity --- Neoclassical theory --- Balance of payments --- Production --- Economic theory --- Investments, Foreign --- Capital movements --- Neoclassical school of economics --- Sierra Leone --- General issues
Choose an application
Identifying determinants of the output-inflation tradeoff has long been a key issue in business cycle research. We provide evidence that in countries with greater restrictions on capital mobility, a given reduction in the inflation rate is associated with a smaller loss in output. This result is shown to be consistent with theoretical presumption from a version of the Mundell-Fleming model. Restrictions on capital mobility are measured using the IMF’s Annual Report on Exchange Rate Arrangements and Exchange Restrictions. Estimates of the output-inflation tradeoff are taken from previous studies, viz., Lucas (1973) and Ball, Mankiw and Romer (1988).
Exports and Imports --- Foreign Exchange --- Inflation --- Economic Theory --- Open Economy Macroeconomics --- International Investment --- Long-term Capital Movements --- Price Level --- Deflation --- Neoclassical through 1925 (Austrian, Marshallian, Walrasian, Wicksellian) --- Empirical Studies of Trade --- International economics --- Currency --- Foreign exchange --- Macroeconomics --- Economic theory & philosophy --- Capital controls --- Real exchange rates --- Neoclassical theory --- Trade balance --- Balance of payments --- Prices --- Economic theory --- International trade --- Capital movements --- Neoclassical school of economics --- Balance of trade --- United States
Choose an application
This paper examines the ability of alternative classes of growth models to explain the historical experience of the U.S. economy. The potential returns to the U.S. from raising its investment rate in terms of both the level and growth rate of future output are then quantified. The long-run growth performance of the U.S. economy is found to be broadly consistent with the predictions of the neoclassical growth model. Endogenous growth models, which suggest a larger contribution of capital to growth and long-run effects of investment on the growth rate, do not seem to be supported by the data.
Aggregate Factor Income Distribution --- Aggregate Human Capital --- Aggregate Labor Productivity --- Capital income --- Capital productivity --- Economic theory & philosophy --- Economic Theory --- Economic theory --- Employment --- Income economics --- Intergenerational Income Distribution --- Intertemporal Choice and Growth: General --- Labor economics --- Labor Economics: General --- Labor --- Labour --- Macroeconomics --- Macroeconomics: Production --- National accounts --- Neoclassical school of economics --- Neoclassical theory --- Neoclassical through 1925 (Austrian, Marshallian, Walrasian, Wicksellian) --- Production and Operations Management --- Production growth --- Production --- Unemployment --- Wages --- Working capital --- United States
Choose an application
This paper examines the dynamics of economic growth. First, it demonstrates that the standard neoclassical growth model with constant elasticity of intertemporal substitution is not consistent with the patterns of development we observe in the real world, once we consider the initial conditions. Second, it examines an alternative growth model, which is consistent with endogenously determined initial conditions and also generates dynamics that are in accord with the historical patterns of growth rates, capital flows, savings rates and labor supply. The alternative model is a generalized version of the neoclassical growth model, with increasing rates of intertemporal substitution due to a Stone-Geary type of utility.
Banks and Banking --- Macroeconomics --- Economic Theory --- Inventions --- Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development --- One, Two, and Multisector Growth Models --- Financial Institutions and Services: Government Policy and Regulation --- Innovation --- Research and Development --- Technological Change --- Intellectual Property Rights: General --- Neoclassical through 1925 (Austrian, Marshallian, Walrasian, Wicksellian) --- Macroeconomics: Consumption --- Saving --- Wealth --- Aggregate Factor Income Distribution --- Financial services law & regulation --- Inventions & inventors --- Economic theory & philosophy --- Capital adequacy requirements --- Technological innovation --- Neoclassical theory --- Consumption --- Income --- Asset requirements --- Technological innovations --- Neoclassical school of economics --- Economics
Choose an application
This Selected Issues paper for France provides an analytical framework to explain the consequences of the downward shift in the unemployment/wages relationship. This framework is also used to analyze possible changes in the equilibrium unemployment rate resulting from cuts in employers’ social security contributions and movements in the user cost of capital. The contribution of wage moderation to the reduction in the equilibrium unemployment is quantified. The paper also addresses the question of fiscal benefits of job-rich growth in France during 1997–2000.
Inflation --- Labor --- Macroeconomics --- Economic Theory --- Production and Operations Management --- Price Level --- Deflation --- Employment --- Unemployment --- Wages --- Intergenerational Income Distribution --- Aggregate Human Capital --- Aggregate Labor Productivity --- Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs: General --- Neoclassical through 1925 (Austrian, Marshallian, Walrasian, Wicksellian) --- Unemployment: Models, Duration, Incidence, and Job Search --- Labour --- income economics --- Economic theory & philosophy --- Welfare & benefit systems --- Economic growth --- Public finance & taxation --- Neoclassical theory --- Output gap --- Prices --- Economic theory --- Production --- Neoclassical school of economics --- France --- Income economics
Choose an application
We propose a method for solving and estimating linear rational expectations models that exhibit indeterminacy and we provide step-by-step guidelines for implementing this method in the Matlab-based packages Dynare and Gensys. Our method redefines a subset of expectational errors as new fundamentals. This redefinition allows us to treat indeterminate models as determinate and to apply standard solution algorithms. We provide a selection method, based on Bayesian model comparison, to decide which errors to pick as fundamental and we present simulation results to show how our procedure works in practice.
Econometric models. --- Rational expectations (Economic theory) --- Expectations, Rational (Economic theory) --- Economic forecasting --- Time and economic reactions --- Uncertainty --- Econometrics --- Mathematical models --- Macroeconomics --- Economic Theory --- Economic Methodology: General --- Estimation --- Model Evaluation and Selection --- Computational Techniques --- Expectations --- Speculations --- Neoclassical through 1925 (Austrian, Marshallian, Walrasian, Wicksellian) --- Labor Economics: General --- Economic theory & philosophy --- Econometrics & economic statistics --- Labour --- income economics --- Rational expectations --- Neoclassical theory --- Estimation techniques --- Labor --- Economic theory --- Neoclassical school of economics --- Econometric models --- Labor economics --- Income economics
Choose an application
The consensus among central bankers is that higher inflation expectations can drive up inflation today, requiring tighter policy. We assess this by devising a novel method for identifying shocks to inflation expectations, estimating a semi-structural VAR where an expectation shock is identified as that which causes measured expectations to diverge from rationality. Using data for the United States, we find that a positive inflation expectations shock is deflationary and contractionary: inflation, output, and interest rates all fall. These results are inconsistent with the standard New Keynesian model, which predicts inflation and interest rate hikes. We discuss possible resolutions to this new puzzle.
Macroeconomics --- Economics: General --- Inflation --- Economic Theory --- Econometrics --- Intelligence (AI) & Semantics --- Expectations --- Speculations --- Price Level --- Deflation --- Money Supply --- Credit --- Money Multipliers --- Monetary Policy --- Neoclassical through 1925 (Austrian, Marshallian, Walrasian, Wicksellian) --- Time-Series Models --- Dynamic Quantile Regressions --- Dynamic Treatment Effect Models --- Diffusion Processes --- Technological Change: Choices and Consequences --- Economic & financial crises & disasters --- Economics of specific sectors --- Economic theory & philosophy --- Econometrics & economic statistics --- Machine learning --- Prices --- Neoclassical theory --- Economic theory --- Rational expectations --- Vector autoregression --- Econometric analysis --- Technology --- Currency crises --- Informal sector --- Economics --- Neoclassical school of economics
Choose an application
The consensus among central bankers is that higher inflation expectations can drive up inflation today, requiring tighter policy. We assess this by devising a novel method for identifying shocks to inflation expectations, estimating a semi-structural VAR where an expectation shock is identified as that which causes measured expectations to diverge from rationality. Using data for the United States, we find that a positive inflation expectations shock is deflationary and contractionary: inflation, output, and interest rates all fall. These results are inconsistent with the standard New Keynesian model, which predicts inflation and interest rate hikes. We discuss possible resolutions to this new puzzle.
Macroeconomics --- Economics: General --- Inflation --- Economic Theory --- Econometrics --- Intelligence (AI) & Semantics --- Expectations --- Speculations --- Price Level --- Deflation --- Money Supply --- Credit --- Money Multipliers --- Monetary Policy --- Neoclassical through 1925 (Austrian, Marshallian, Walrasian, Wicksellian) --- Time-Series Models --- Dynamic Quantile Regressions --- Dynamic Treatment Effect Models --- Diffusion Processes --- Technological Change: Choices and Consequences --- Economic & financial crises & disasters --- Economics of specific sectors --- Economic theory & philosophy --- Econometrics & economic statistics --- Machine learning --- Prices --- Neoclassical theory --- Economic theory --- Rational expectations --- Vector autoregression --- Econometric analysis --- Technology --- Currency crises --- Informal sector --- Economics --- Neoclassical school of economics
Choose an application
The form of bounded rationality characterizing the representative agent is key in the choice of the optimal monetary policy regime. While inflation targeting prevails for myopia that distorts agents' inflation expectations, price level targeting emerges as the optimal policy under myopia regarding the output gap, revenue, or interest rate. To the extent that bygones are not bygones under price level targeting, rational inflation expectations is a minimal condition for optimality in a behavioral world. Instrument rules implementation of this optimal policy is shown to be infeasible, questioning the ability of simple rules à la Taylor (1993) to assist the conduct of monetary policy. Bounded rationality is not necessarily associated with welfare losses.
Monetary policy. --- Monetary management --- Economic policy --- Currency boards --- Money supply --- Banks and Banking --- Inflation --- Economic Theory --- Production and Operations Management --- Forecasting and Other Model Applications --- Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles: Forecasting and Simulation --- Monetary Policy --- Microeconomic Behavior: Underlying Principles --- Consumer Economics: Theory --- Macroeconomics: Production --- Price Level --- Deflation --- Banks --- Depository Institutions --- Micro Finance Institutions --- Mortgages --- Neoclassical through 1925 (Austrian, Marshallian, Walrasian, Wicksellian) --- Interest Rates: Determination, Term Structure, and Effects --- Macroeconomics --- Banking --- Economic theory & philosophy --- Finance --- Output gap --- Neoclassical theory --- Real interest rates --- Production --- Economic theory --- Prices --- Banks and banking --- Neoclassical school of economics --- Interest rates
Listing 1 - 10 of 14 | << page >> |
Sort by
|