Listing 1 - 2 of 2 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
McBride's book considers a variety of puzzles concerning immediate justification and knowledge. These puzzles are of active interest in the field, and it is useful to address them all in a single volume. I learned from this book, even when it covered issues I already knew well. ―Prof. Christopher Tucker, William & Mary University How do we know what we know? In this stimulating and rigorous book, Mark McBride explores two sets of issues in contemporary epistemology: the problems that warrant transmission poses for the category of basic knowledge; and the status of conclusive reasons, sensitivity, and safety as conditions that are necessary for knowledge. To have basic knowledge is to know (have justification for) some proposition immediately, i.e., knowledge (justification) that doesn't depend on justification for any other proposition. This book considers several puzzles that arise when you take seriously the possibility that we can have basic knowledge. McBride's analysis draws together two vital strands in contemporary epistemology that are usually treated in isolation from each other. Additionally, its innovative arguments include a new application of the safety condition to the law.
Justification (Theory of knowledge) --- Knowledge, Theory of. --- Cognitive science New. --- Epistemology --- Theory of knowledge --- Philosophy --- Psychology --- Knowledge, Theory of --- justifications --- safety condition --- sensitivity --- basic knowledge --- epistemology --- conclusive reasons --- Brain in a vat --- Coherentism --- Dogma --- Fallibilism --- Foundationalism --- Fred Dretske --- Inference --- Logical consequence --- Robert Nozick --- Fertility, Human --- Human reproduction --- United States.
Choose an application
Edwin Hartman explores Aristotle's metaphysical assumptions as they illuminate his thought and some issues of current philosophical significance. The author's analysis of the theory of the soul treats such topics of lively debate as ontological primacy, spatio-temporal continuity, personal identity, and the relation between mind and body. Aristotle presents a world populated primarily by individual material objects rather than by their parts or by universals. The author notes that defense of this view requires Aristotle to create the notion of form or essence. A material object, the Philosopher holds, is identical with its particular essence, and is not a combination of form and matter. Most important, a person is a substance and his essence is his soul. Personal identify is therefore bodily identity, and survival consists in bodily continuity. The relation between a state of perceiving and a state of the body is a special case of the weak identity between form and matter.Originally published in 1978.The Princeton Legacy Library uses the latest print-on-demand technology to again make available previously out-of-print books from the distinguished backlist of Princeton University Press. These editions preserve the original texts of these important books while presenting them in durable paperback and hardcover editions. The goal of the Princeton Legacy Library is to vastly increase access to the rich scholarly heritage found in the thousands of books published by Princeton University Press since its founding in 1905.
Mind and body. --- Soul. --- Substance (Philosophy). --- Philosophical anthropology --- Metaphysics --- Aristotle --- Substance (Philosophy) --- Mind and body --- Soul --- Substance (Philosophie) --- Esprit et corps --- Ame --- Aristotle. --- Matter --- Ontology --- Reality --- Body and mind --- Body and soul (Philosophy) --- Human body --- Mind --- Mind-body connection --- Mind-body relations --- Mind-cure --- Somatopsychics --- Brain --- Dualism --- Holistic medicine --- Mental healing --- Parousia (Philosophy) --- Phrenology --- Psychophysiology --- Self --- Pneuma --- Future life --- Theological anthropology --- Animism --- Spirit --- Psychological aspects --- Abstract and concrete. --- Abstraction. --- Affection. --- Akrasia. --- Analogy. --- Analytic–synthetic distinction. --- Awareness. --- Bernard Williams. --- Brute fact. --- Causal chain. --- Causality. --- Cognition. --- Concept. --- Consciousness. --- Counterexample. --- De Interpretatione. --- Determination. --- Dialectician. --- Differentia. --- Disposition. --- Dualism (philosophy of mind). --- Empirical evidence. --- Entity. --- Episteme. --- Epistemology. --- Essentialism. --- Ethics. --- Excellence. --- Existence. --- Explanation. --- Explication. --- Falsity. --- Feeling. --- First principle. --- Four causes. --- Hilary Putnam. --- Human behavior. --- Imagination. --- Incorrigibility. --- Individual. --- Individuation. --- Inference. --- Infinite regress. --- Inherence. --- Intellect. --- Intentionality. --- Ipso facto. --- Jerry Fodor. --- Logical consequence. --- Logical truth. --- Materialism. --- Mental event. --- Mental image. --- Mental property. --- Mental representation. --- Nous. --- On Memory. --- On the Soul. --- Perception. --- Personal identity. --- Phenomenon. --- Philosopher. --- Philosophy of mind. --- Physical body. --- Physical property. --- Platonic realism. --- Posterior Analytics. --- Potentiality and actuality. --- Precognition. --- Premise. --- Premises. --- Primary/secondary quality distinction. --- Privileged access. --- Proffer. --- Propositional attitude. --- Qualia. --- Reality. --- Reason. --- Rigid designator. --- Self-actualization. --- Self-awareness. --- Self-consciousness. --- Sense. --- Sophistication. --- Sortal. --- Subjectivity. --- Substance theory. --- Suggestion. --- Syllogism. --- The Concept of Mind. --- Themistius. --- Theory of Forms. --- Theory of justification. --- Theory. --- Thought. --- Truth. --- Universal law. --- W. D. Ross. --- Wilfrid Sellars.
Listing 1 - 2 of 2 |
Sort by
|