Listing 1 - 8 of 8 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Can presidents influence whether Congress enacts their agenda? Most research on presidential-congressional relations suggests that presidents have little if any influence on Congress. Instead, structural factors like party control largely determine the fate of the president's legislative agenda. In The President on Capitol Hill, Jeffrey E. Cohen challenges this conventional view, arguing that existing research has underestimated the president's power to sway Congress and developing a new theory of presidential influence.Cohen demonstrates that by taking a position, the president converts an issue from a nonpresidential into a presidential one, which leads members of Congress to consider the president's views when deciding how to vote. Presidential position taking also converts the factors that normally affect roll call voting-such as party, public opinion, and policy type-into resources that presidents can leverage to influence the vote. By testing all House roll calls from 1877 to 2012, Cohen finds that not only do presidents have more influence than previously thought, but through their influence, they can affect the substance of public policy. The President on Capitol Hill offers a new perspective on presidential-congressional relations, showing that presidents are not simply captives of larger political forces but rather major players in the legislative process.
Presidents --- Executive-legislative relations --- Executive power --- Congressional-executive relations --- Congressional-presidential relations --- Executive-congressional relations --- Legislative-executive relationships --- Presidential-congressional relations --- Separation of powers --- Powers --- United States. --- Voting.
Choose an application
In an original assessment of all three branches, Jasmine Farrier reveals a new way in which the American federal system is broken. Turning away from the partisan narratives of everyday politics, Constitutional Dysfunction on Trial diagnoses the deeper and bipartisan nature of imbalance of power that undermines public deliberation and accountability, especially on war powers. By focusing on the lawsuits brought by Congressional members that challenge presidential unilateralism, Farrier provides a new diagnostic lens on the permanent institutional problems that have undermined the separation of powers system in the last five decades, across a diverse array of partisan and policy landscapes. As each chapter demonstrates, member lawsuits are an outlet for frustrated members of both parties who cannot get their House and Senate colleagues to confront overweening presidential action through normal legislative processes. But these lawsuits often backfire - leaving Congress as an institution even more disadvantaged. Jasmine Farrier argues these suits are more symptoms of constitutional dysfunction than the cure. Constitutional Dysfunction on Trial shows federal judges will not and cannot restore the separation of powers system alone. Fifty years of congressional atrophy cannot be reversed in court.
Political questions and judicial power --- Executive-legislative relations --- Judicial power --- Legislative power --- Executive power --- Separation of powers --- Emergency powers --- Power, Executive --- Presidents --- Political science --- Implied powers (Constitutional law) --- Power, Legislative --- Constitutional law --- Judicial review --- Judiciary --- Justiciability --- Power, Judicial --- Courts --- Judicial independence --- Congressional-executive relations --- Congressional-presidential relations --- Executive-congressional relations --- Legislative-executive relationships --- Presidential-congressional relations --- Cases. --- Powers --- constitution, congress, president, court, war powers.
Choose an application
Analysing the conditions under which governments are more likely to present an executive law or a government bill, this book addresses a central aspect of the decision-making process of public policies. Drafting legislation is an important action to achieve specific policy goals, and the path chosen for this process is part of governmental strategy. This book presents a new theoretical explanation of how executives wield legislative power, based in a formal model. The model is tested using new data from Portugal. It shows that in political systems where one of the political actors has veto powers which can easily be overridden, the type of parliamentary majority is the main consideration for the government's choice of legislative instrument. More specifically, when a government does not have the majority in parliament it is more likely to propose an executive law, and contrary, when a government has a majority in parliament, it is more likely to propose a government bill.
Cabinet system. --- Executive-legislative relations. --- Policy sciences. --- Policy-making --- Policymaking --- Public policy management --- Congressional-executive relations --- Congressional-presidential relations --- Executive-congressional relations --- Legislative-executive relationships --- Presidential-congressional relations --- Separation of powers --- Cabinet government --- Parliamentary government --- Political science --- Representative government and representation
Choose an application
Legislative power --- Executive-legislative relations --- Law - Europe, except U.K. --- Law - Non-U.S. --- Law, Politics & Government --- Congressional-executive relations --- Congressional-presidential relations --- Executive-congressional relations --- Legislative-executive relationships --- Presidential-congressional relations --- Separation of powers --- Power, Legislative --- Constitutional law --- Implied powers (Constitutional law) --- Judicial review --- France. --- Powers and duties --- France --- Constitution (1958) --- Révision
Choose an application
'Backdoor Lawmaking' reveals how members of the US Congress use the federal bureaucracy as a backdoor for policymaking. Lawmakers pressure agencies to make policy changes in order to avoid obstacles in the legislative process. The book uses records obtained under the Freedom of Information Act in qualitative and quantitative analyses to show how members of Congress are incorporating agency regulations into a broader strategy of policymaking that spans branches of government and which lawmakers are most effective at using this approach.
Policy sciences --- Executive-legislative relations --- Administrative agencies --- Legislation --- Government accountability --- Bureaucracy --- Politics and Government. --- Politics & government. --- United States. --- Rules and practice. --- Accountability in government --- Public administration --- Responsibility --- Legislative process --- Law --- Congressional-executive relations --- Congressional-presidential relations --- Executive-congressional relations --- Legislative-executive relationships --- Presidential-congressional relations --- Separation of powers --- Policy-making --- Policymaking --- Public policy management
Choose an application
Executive-legislative relations --- Federal aid to water resources development --- Veto --- Water resources development --- Congressional-executive relations --- Congressional-presidential relations --- Executive-congressional relations --- Legislative-executive relationships --- Presidential-congressional relations --- Separation of powers --- History --- Government policy --- Carter, Jimmy, --- Carter, James Earl, --- Carter, Hot, --- Kārtir, --- Kʻa-tʻe, --- Kartŭr, --- Kʻatʻŏ, Chimi, --- Kʻatʻŏ, Jimi, --- Kʻa-tʻe, Chi-mi, --- Kartėr, Dz︠h︡ymi, --- Relations with legislators. --- United States --- Politics and government --- 20th century --- Carter, Jimmy --- Relations with legislators --- 1977-1981
Choose an application
Why does institutional instability pervade the developing world? Examining contemporary Latin America, Institutions on the Edge develops and tests a novel argument to explain why institutional crises emerge, spread, and repeat in some countries, but not in others. The book draws on formal bargaining theories developed in the conflict literature to offer the first unified micro-level account of inter-branch crises. In so doing, Helmke shows that concentrating power in the executive branch not only fuels presidential crises under divided government, but also triggers broader constitutional crises that cascade on to the legislature and the judiciary. Along the way, Helmke highlights the importance of public opinion and mass protests, and elucidates the conditions under which divided government matters for institutional instability.
Political stability --- Executive-legislative relations --- Divided government --- Public opinion --- Opinion, Public --- Perception, Public --- Popular opinion --- Public perception --- Public perceptions --- Judgment --- Social psychology --- Attitude (Psychology) --- Focus groups --- Reputation --- Political science --- Opposition (Political science) --- Political parties --- Congressional-executive relations --- Congressional-presidential relations --- Executive-congressional relations --- Legislative-executive relationships --- Presidential-congressional relations --- Separation of powers --- Destabilization (Political science) --- Political instability --- Stability, Political --- Consensus (Social sciences) --- Legitimacy of governments --- Political aspects --- Latin America --- Politics and government.
Choose an application
When the United States goes to war, the nation's attention focuses on the president. As commander in chief, a president reaches the zenith of power, while Congress is supposedly shunted to the sidelines once troops have been deployed abroad. Because of Congress's repeated failure to exercise its legislative powers to rein in presidents, many have proclaimed its irrelevance in military matters. After the Rubicon challenges this conventional wisdom by illuminating the diverse ways in which legislators influence the conduct of military affairs. Douglas L. Kriner reveals that even in politically sensitive wartime environments, individual members of Congress frequently propose legislation, hold investigative hearings, and engage in national policy debates in the public sphere. These actions influence the president's strategic decisions as he weighs the political costs of pursuing his preferred military course. Marshalling a wealth of quantitative and historical evidence, Kriner expertly demonstrates the full extent to which Congress materially shapes the initiation, scope, and duration of major military actions and sheds new light on the timely issue of interbranch relations.
Executive-legislative relations --- Politics and war --- Executive power --- United States. --- Powers and duties --- United States --- Military policy --- History, Military --- United States. Congress --- History [Military ] --- Presidents --- War --- War and politics --- Congressional-executive relations --- Congressional-presidential relations --- Executive-congressional relations --- Legislative-executive relationships --- Presidential-congressional relations --- Separation of powers --- Powers --- Political aspects --- Powers and duties. --- Military policy. --- History, Military. --- Executive-legislative relations - United States --- Politics and war - United States --- Executive power - United States --- United States - Military policy --- United States - History, Military --- united states politics, war, warfare, social sciences, history, us presidents, commander in chief, congress, troops, american military, legislative powers, conventional wisdom, wartime environments, international relations, diplomacy, national policy debates, historical evidence, investigative hearings, strategic decisions, public sphere, executive power, marines, legislators.
Listing 1 - 8 of 8 |
Sort by
|