Listing 1 - 10 of 14 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
(Produktform)Electronic book text --- Philosophie --- Legal Philosophy --- Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie --- Recht --- (VLB-WN)9770
Choose an application
Thomas Morus' „Von der besten Staatsverfassung und von der neuen Insel Utopia, ein wahrhaft goldenes Büchlein, genauso wohltuend wie heiter“ ist ein Klassiker der Politischen Philosophie. Das 1516 erstmals erschienene Buch prägte die spätere Tradition fiktiver Staatsmodelle. Der Name 'Utopia' bezeichnet nämlich ein „Nirgendwo“, durch dessen Unauffindbarkeit alle Sehnsüchte in eine unerreichbare Ferne projiziert werden. Als Utopie gilt somit eine Vorstellung, die als Idee zwar denkbar, aber nicht unmittelbar umzusetzen ist. Sie ist Wunschtraum, Konzept und Vision einer Welt oder einer Zeit, in der eine neue gesellschaftliche, religiöse oder technische Ordnung herrscht. Der Band hinterfragt, mit welchen Chancen auf gesellschaftspolitische Diskussion heute überhaupt noch fiktive Staatsmodelle ausgearbeitet werden können. Sind z.B. die modernen, weltweit stark rezipierten Entwürfe wie Rawls' Theorie der Gerechtigkeit, No-zicks' Anarchie, Staat, Utopia oder die Sphären der Gerechtigkeit von Walzer als Utopien zu klassifizieren? Oder sind die fiktiven Elemente in ihnen so realitätsnah, daß man sie nicht mehr als utopisch beschreiben kann? Brauchen wir überhaupt Utopien, um in der Lage zu sein, neue, „zukunftsfähige“ Modelle der politischen Organisation einer Gesellschaft zu entwerfen? Oder ist die Politische Philosophie so saturiert, daß selbst unter dem Veränderungsdruck der Globalisierung in absehbarer Zeit mit neuen Staatsutopien nicht zu rechnen sein wird?
Philosophy --- Politische Philosophie --- Utopie --- Gemeinwesen --- Staat --- Gesellschaft --- Rechtsphilosophie --- Sozialphilosophie --- Liberalismus --- Political philosophy --- Utopia --- Community --- Society --- Legal philosophy --- Social philosophy --- Liberalism
Choose an application
« C’est de la bonté des lois criminelles que dépend principalement la liberté des citoyens. » Par sa critique des interdictions exorbitantes, des châtiments disproportionnés, des accusations invérifiables et des jugements arbitraires, Montesquieu nous apprend que le conflit entre individu et autorité n’est jamais plus dramatique et plus aigu que sur le terrain de la pénalité. Le pouvoir de punir est certes indispensable à la protection de nos droits, mais en les protégeant des violations qui les menacent, il menace lui aussi de les violer. Quelles limites assigner aux prohibitions légitimes ? Dans quel but et comment punir les transgresseurs ? Comment s’assurer de la violation des normes juridiques et de la responsabilité personnelle d’une action criminelle ? Envisagé dans la perspective de la philosophie du droit, L’Esprit des lois révèle sa puissante dimension normative et ouvre l’horizon du « garantisme pénal ». “It is on the goodness of criminal laws that the liberty of the subject principally depends.” By criticising outrageous prohibitions, disproportionate punishments, unverifiable accusations and arbitrary judgments, Montesquieu teaches us that the conflict between the individual and authority is never more dramatic and more acute than with regard to punishment. While the power to punish is certainly indispensable in protecting our rights, it itself constitutes a threat to the very rights that it aims to protect from possible violations. What limits should there be on legitimate prohibitions? Why and how should wrongdoers be punished? How can we identify with certainty any infringement of the law and personal liability for a criminal action? Formulated from the legal philosophy angle, >The Spirit of the Laws reveals its powerful normative dimension and opens up the perspective of “penal guaranteeism”.
Philosophy --- Law (General) --- Montesquieu --- droit pénal --- philosophie du droit --- droits fondamentaux --- Lumières --- criminal law --- legal philosophy --- fundamental rights --- Enlightenment
Choose an application
LAM --- legal theory, Macht, Rechtstheorie, Rechtsphilosophie, legal philosophy, Verfassungstheorie, Verfassungspragmatismus, Objektivität, Wesentlichkeitsdoktrin, Legal Reasoning, Algorithmic Crime Control, International Arbitration, Unschuld --- Law --- Balance of power. --- Objectivity. --- Philosophy. --- Methodology.
Choose an application
"This book uses the philosophy of Thomas Kuhn to provide a new vision of the development of European comparative law that will challenge and inspire scholars in the field. With the 'empathic' use of some ideas from Kuhn's theories on the history of science - paradigm, paradigm-shift, puzzle-solving research and incommensurability - the book rethinks the modern history of European comparative law from the late 19th century to the modern day. It argues that three major paradigms determine modern comparative law: - historical and comparative jurisprudence, - droit comparé, and - post-World War II comparative law. It concludes that contemporary methodological trends are not signs of a paradigm-shift toward a postmodern and culturalist understanding of comparative law, but that the new approach spreads the idea of methodological plurality"--
Comparative law. --- Comparative jurisprudence --- Comparative legislation --- Jurisprudence, Comparative --- Law, Comparative --- Legislation, Comparative --- Paradigms (Social sciences) --- Law. --- Comparative Law (Law) --- Legal Philosophy (Law),Legal History (Law) --- Comparative law --- Kuhn, Thomas S. --- Influence. --- Social sciences
Choose an application
Political philosophy. Social philosophy --- Legal theory and methods. Philosophy of law --- (Produktform)Electronic book text --- Anarchism --- Anarchy --- Diversity --- Domination --- Enlightenment --- History of Anarchism --- Human Dignity --- Human Rights --- Legal Philosophy --- Power --- Social Order --- State --- (VLB-WN)9770
Choose an application
Ethics --- Political ethics --- Morale --- Morale politique --- Periodicals --- Périodiques --- Philosophy --- Political science --- Ethics. --- Philosophy. --- Arts and Humanities --- political philosophy --- moral philosophy --- legal philosophy --- ethics --- applied ethics --- political theory --- Political philosophy --- Mental philosophy --- Humanities --- Deontology --- Ethics, Primitive --- Ethology --- Moral philosophy --- Morality --- Morals --- Philosophy, Moral --- Science, Moral --- Values
Choose an application
“This book stands out among works of the emerging new generation of anarchist theorists. Unlike much of the trendy “post-anarchism,” it is firmly grounded in political philosophy and the history of anarchist thought. Jun shows that ideas often seen as bold new “post-modern” innovations above all, the critique of representation are in fact deeply rooted in the anarchist tradition. He debunks the equation of classical anarchist theory with the weakest aspects of modernism and shows anarchism to be a powerful radical tradition that goes beyond the limits of conventional liberalism and socialism. Jun presents strong evidence that anarchism is now becoming most the promising theoretical alternative within the dissident academy.” John P. Clark, Gregory Curtin Distinguished Professor of Humane Studies and the Professions and Professor of Philosophy, Loyola University.
Anarchism --- Postmodernism. --- Poststructuralism. --- Political science --- Philosophy. --- History. --- Philosophy --- Post-structuralism --- Post-modernism --- Postmodernism (Philosophy) --- Anarchism and anarchists --- Anarchy --- Philosophy, Modern --- Structuralism --- Arts, Modern --- Avant-garde (Aesthetics) --- Modernism (Art) --- Post-postmodernism --- Government, Resistance to --- Libertarianism --- Nihilism --- Socialism --- Politics & International Relations --- Political Theory and Philosophy (Politics) --- Social and Political Philosophy (Philosophy) --- Political and Legal Philosophy (Politics) --- Supplementary Standard
Choose an application
"There is no political term today that has a greater cachet and so little clarity than democracy. Leaders of large states use it to designate their nations’ public character, while it is also used by critics of leaders calling themselves “democratic” to spearhead their calls for political reforms. In Envisioning Democracy, Terry Maley and John R. Wallach address the following key questions: What does democracy mean today? What could it mean tomorrow? What is the dynamic of democracy, especially in an increasingly interdependent world of growing inequality, that can be captured by authoritarian populist leaders? Envisioning Democracy explores these questions amid the dynamic of democracy as a political phenomenon interacting with forms of economic, ethical, and intellectual life. The book draws on the thought of one of America’s greatest writers on democracy in the last fifty years, Sheldon S. Wolin (1922-2015). In this collection, scholars consider the historical conditions, theoretical elements, and practical impediments to democracy, relying on Wolin’s insights as touchstones in thinking through what democracy means now and what it could mean in the future. Envisioning Democracy presents new perspectives on longstanding, current, and future issues surrounding democracy and liberalism in political theory."--
Democracy. --- Political science. --- Administration --- Civil government --- Commonwealth, The --- Government --- Political theory --- Political thought --- Politics --- Science, Political --- Social sciences --- State, The --- Self-government --- Political science --- Equality --- Representative government and representation --- Republics --- anthropocene. --- democracy. --- democratic theory. --- fugitive democracy. --- human rights. --- legal philosophy. --- political education. --- political theory. --- reactionary tribalism. --- reconciliation. --- settler colonialism. --- Political philosophy. Social philosophy --- Wolin, Sheldon
Choose an application
In Philosophy of Law, Andrei Marmor provides a comprehensive analysis of contemporary debates about the fundamental nature of law--an issue that has been at the heart of legal philosophy for centuries. What the law is seems to be a matter of fact, but this fact has normative significance: it tells people what they ought to do. Is the normative content of a law entirely determined by the facts that make it a law? Are there some normative moral constraints on what the law can be? And can we fully characterize and define the law without assuming a moral conception about what the law oug
Law --- Philosophy. --- Dworkin. --- H. L. A. Hart. --- Hans Kelsen. --- Joseph Raz. --- antireductionism. --- detachment view. --- detachment. --- factual. --- interpretation. --- language. --- law. --- legal philosophy. --- legal positivism. --- legal thought. --- legal validity. --- moral views. --- nature of law. --- nondetachment view. --- normative consideration. --- normative. --- political views. --- reduction. --- social rules. --- state sovereignty. --- substance method. --- theory of law.
Listing 1 - 10 of 14 | << page >> |
Sort by
|