Listing 1 - 10 of 14 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Droit international --- Ex-yougoslavie --- Ideologies --- Juridictions internationales --- Politique --- Regles internationales
Choose an application
conseil de l'europe --- droits et libertes --- juridictions internationales
Choose an application
Droit --- Éthique --- Etats --- Juridictions internationales --- Regles internationales --- Relations internationales
Choose an application
problemes de la vie internationale --- vie internationale --- chili --- regles internationales --- juridictions internationales
Choose an application
Economic law --- Europe --- Foreign trade regulation --- EEE = Espace économique européen. --- AELE = Association européenne de libre-échange. --- Juridictions internationales. --- UE/CE Cour de justice. --- Compétence des tribunaux. --- Congrès. --- EFTA Court --- European Free Trade Association
Choose an application
Globalization. --- Intergovernmental cooperation. --- International law. --- Mondialisation --- Coopération intergouvernementale --- Droit international --- Coopération intergouvernementale --- #SBIB:327.1H10 --- Internationale betrekkingen: theorieën --- International relations. Foreign policy --- Community organization --- International economic relations --- International law --- VIE INTERNATIONALE --- REGLES INTERNATIONALES --- ORDRE MONDIAL --- JURIDICTIONS INTERNATIONALES
Choose an application
Poursuivant la démarche comparative pour la sixième Journée d'études sur le contentieux international, l'UMR de Droit comparé et le CERDIN de l'Université de Paris 1 ont choisi d'explorer la question de la Motivation des décisions des juridictions internationales. Après les thèmes de l'Urgence, du Principe du contradictoire, du Tiers à l'instance, de la Saisine des juridictions et de la Preuve, il était nécessaire de se pencher sur la question de la motivation des décisions au coeur du processus de fabrication de la solution par le juge. Une fois de plus, il s'agissait de porter un regard croisé sur les interactions et chevauchements entre les méthodes des juridictions dans les différents espaces normatifs du droit international, mais aussi du droit interne. La question de la motivation des décisions des juridictions peut effrayer tant son spectre semble large et échapper en partie à toute analyse transversale. Certes, la diversité est comme toujours au rendez-vous, ne serait-ce que parce que les justiciables n'ont pas les mêmes attentes, mais, au-delà de la diversité, des préoccupations se rejoignent et des questions comparables émergent. L'analyse comparative démontre ainsi une nouvelle fois sa richesse, aussi bien pratique que théorique, et les précieux enseignements qu'il est possible d'en retirer.
International courts --- Motivation --- Tribunaux internationaux --- Congresses --- Law and legislation --- Congrès --- Droit --- Jurisdiction (International law) --- Congrès --- Droit international privé --- CJCE --- Juridictions internationales --- TPI --- CEDH --- TPIY --- TPIR --- CPI --- Motivations des décisions judiciaires
Choose an application
International private law --- Jurisdiction (International law) --- International courts --- Civil procedure (International law) --- Juridiction (Droit international) --- Tribunaux internationaux --- Procédure civile (Droit international) --- Congresses. --- Congresses --- Congrès --- Procédure civile (Droit international) --- Congrès --- Droit international privé --- Procédure civile internationale --- Juridictions internationales --- Introduction de la demande
Choose an application
International law --- International relations --- Military missions --- International organization --- Relations internationales --- Missions militaires --- Organisation internationale --- 327.8 --- 341.233 --- Intervention (International law) --- Sanctions (International law) --- Intervention (International law). --- Sanctions (International law). --- Ingerence (droit d') --- Juridictions internationales --- Organisations des nations unies --- Regles internationales --- INGERENCE, DROIT D' --- HISTOIRE --- 20E SIECLE
Choose an application
"International justice has become a crucial part of the ongoing political debates about the future of shattered societies like Bosnia, Kosovo, Rwanda, Cambodia, and Chile. Why do our governments sometimes display such striking idealism in the face of war crimes and atrocities abroad, and at other times cynically abandon the pursuit of international justice altogether? Why today does justice seem so slow to come for war crimes victims in the Balkans? In this book, Gary Bass offers an unprecedented look at the politics behind international war crimes tribunals, combining analysis with investigative reporting and a broad historical perspective. The Nuremberg trials powerfully demonstrated how effective war crimes tribunals can be. But there have been many other important tribunals that have not been as successful, and which have been largely left out of today's debates about international justice. This timely book brings them in, using primary documents to examine the aftermath of the Napoleonic Wars, World War I, the Armenian genocide, World War II, and the recent wars in the former Yugoslavia. Bass explains that bringing war criminals to justice can be a military ordeal, a source of endless legal frustration, as well as a diplomatic nightmare. The book takes readers behind the scenes to see vividly how leaders like David Lloyd George, Winston Churchill, Franklin Roosevelt, and Bill Clinton have wrestled with these agonizing moral dilemmas. The book asks how law and international politics interact, and how power can be made to serve the cause of justice. Bass brings new archival research to bear on such events as the prosecution of the Armenian genocide, presenting surprising episodes that add to the historical record. His sections on the former Yugoslavia tell--with important new discoveries--the secret story of the politicking behind the prosecution of war crimes in Bosnia, drawing on interviews with senior White House officials, key diplomats, and chief prosecutors at the war crimes tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. Bass concludes that despite the obstacles, legalistic justice for war criminals is nonetheless worth pursuing. His arguments will interest anyone concerned about human rights and the pursuit of idealism in international politics."
Law of armed conflicts. Humanitarian law --- International criminal courts. --- War crime trials. --- Law and politics. --- Tribunaux criminels internationaux --- Procès (Crimes de guerre) --- Droit et politique --- Law --- Political aspects. --- War crime trials.Political aspects. --- Procès (Crimes de guerre) --- Criminal courts --- International courts --- Complementarity (International law) --- Trials (War crimes) --- Trials (Crimes against humanity) --- Trials (Genocide) --- Trials --- Law and politics --- VIE INTERNATIONALE --- REGLES INTERNATIONALES --- JURIDICTIONS INTERNATIONALES --- DROIT HUMANITAIRE
Listing 1 - 10 of 14 | << page >> |
Sort by
|