Listing 1 - 10 of 37 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
Islamic courts --- Malaysia --- Social conditions.
Choose an application
Islamic courts --- Islamic law --- Islamic shrines --- Mosques --- Waqf
Choose an application
"What if the Taliban, with military and technological capabilities far inferior to those of Western armies, had won the war through law? While the international coalition set up an inadequate and corrupt legal system, the Taliban set up hundreds of courts in the countryside: by insisting on due process, impartiality from the judges and the enforcement of verdicts, this system of justice has established itself as one of the few sources of predictability in the daily lives of Afghans"--
Justice, Administration of --- Islamic courts --- Judges (Islamic law)
Choose an application
Constitutional law --- Criminal law (Islamic law) --- Criminal law --- Islamic courts
Choose an application
How did the Taliban gain the trust of the Afghan population through decades of conflict? How did they put themselves in a position to regulate social relations? And with what consequences for Afghan society? This book explores how the Taliban used the law as a resource in its conflict with militarily and technologically superior Western armies.
Justice, Administration of. --- Islamic courts. --- Justice, Administration of --- Islamic courts --- Taliban. --- Law. --- Laws of specific jurisdictions & specific areas of law.
Choose an application
State and federal courts are available to resolve disputes between co-religionist parties the same way that they are available to all Americans. Religious parties, however, are increasingly choosing to avoid resolving co-religionist conflicts of this kind in traditional courts, instead opting for private dispute resolution methods based on religious principles. This chapter explores this phenomenon by focusing on an argument put forth by Professors Michael A. Helfand and Barak D. Richman that state and federal courts can and should be more willing to engage in resolving co-religionist disputes. This chapter argues that one of the reasons for the increased demand for and importance of religious arbitration is that secular courts are poorly equipped to address such cases in ways that effectively uphold the understandings and expectations of religious parties engaged in co-religionist commercial conflicts
Ecclesiastical courts --- Dispute resolution (Law) --- Church and state --- Islamic courts --- Rabbinical courts --- Faith-based dispute resolution
Choose an application
Islamic courts --- Justice, Administration of (Islamic law) --- Tribunaux islamiques --- Justice --- Administration (Droit islamique)
Listing 1 - 10 of 37 | << page >> |
Sort by
|