Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This book is an open access book. Many scholars have wondered if a non-Western theory of international politics founded on different premises, be it from Asia or from the “Global South,” could release international relations from the grip of a Western, “Westphalian” model. This book argues that a Buddhist approach to international relations could provide a genuine alternative. Because of its distinctive philosophical positions and its unique understanding of reality, human nature and political behavior, a Buddhist theory of IR offers a way out of this dilemma, a means for transcending the Westphalian predicament. The author explains this Buddhist IR model, beginning with its philosophical foundations up through its ideas about politics, economics and statecraft.

International relations --- International Relations Theory --- International Security Studies --- International Relations --- Buddhism --- Politics --- Asoka --- Buthan --- Open Access

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This book is about how best to respond to existential global threats posed by war and global heating. The stakes have become existential. A strong claim in the book is that we need a world state to save humanity. The book sheds new light on why this is so. The present author has long advocated global democracy. A strong argument against global democracy has been, however, that no state has ever been established without the resort to violence. In this book, the author bites the bullet and advocates a route to global democracy that passes through a phase where a global state is established in the form of global despotism. First despotism, then democracy! But, as the author insists and the reader will find, this is at most something we can hope for. We may fail. The moral importance of failure is thoroughly discussed. The book explored the following topics: · The tragedy of the commons is presented as the best explanation of why we do so little to obviate the causes behind climate change. · A world government presents a way out of the tragedy of the commons. · Standard arguments against a world state are examined. · The question of whether it matters if humanity goes extinct is taken seriously. · What if the attempt to establish a world state fails. The book is written by a philosopher, but the intended audience is broad. It has a place in courses in political philosophy, but it is possible for anyone who wants to do so to dig deeper into the questions should be able to read it. And regardless of whether you who read the book are a scholar or a layperson, there is no way for you to avoid its topic. Global existential issues concern all of us, regardless of profession or nationality.

Political science --- Political ethics. --- International relations. --- Globalization. --- Political Philosophy. --- Political Ethics. --- International Relations Theory. --- Philosophy.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

“In this captivating book Yong-Soo Eun makes the case for rethinking fixed and fluid identities in terms of “both-and” rather than “either-or.” They are emergent processes grounded in an ontology of immanence. Thought-provoking theoretical discussions and rich empirical illustrations are brought together in an illuminating essay that is germane for all students of IR theory.” —Peter J. Katzenstein, Walter S. Carpenter Jr. Professor of International Studies, Cornell University, USA “Eun Yong-Soo’s ontological rethinking of identity in International Studies provides a fresh perspective on conventional and critical constructivist approaches to the subject. Moving beyond the either/or to the both/and, he re-grounds identity in a Deleuzian ontology of immanence. The book provides not only a beautifully written and concise typology of existing constructivisms, but also through an unpacking of components of European, Chinese and South Korean identities, a model for investigating identity construction in practice, which he further situates in a field that has tended to reify distinctions between West and non-West. The book is must reading for all who seek a way out of the current impasse and a richer understanding of what it might mean for IR to ‘become rhizomatic.’” —K.M. Fierke, Professor of International Relations, School of International Relations, St. Andrews, UK “Engaging Western constructivist theories, continental philosophy and East Asian sources, Yong-Soo Eun offers a new typology for understanding the role of identity in International Relations research. The ensuing insights advance important scholarly debates that have both conceptual and practical implications.” —Roland Bleiker, Professor of International Relations, University of Queensland, Australia This book shows that identity studies in IR generally cohere around two discrete understandings of being, substantialism and correlationism, and that their analytical, theoretical, and epistemological orientations are split along those lines. The author argues that the best way to step outside that binary is to re-ground identity in ontology of immanence. Yong-Soo Eun is Professor of Political Science and International Studies at Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea.

International relations. Foreign policy --- internationale betrekkingen --- International relations. --- International Relations Theory.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Dieser interdisziplinäre Sammelband vereint in zehn Beiträgen Analysen bi- und multipolarer Relationen, durch die potentielle Chancen, aber auch problematische Implikate vor Augen treten. Der Inhalt „Ironie“. Interpretationsmodell der Historie und ihre Bedeutung für Reinhold Niebuhrs politische Theologie heute ● Über Fremdheit und Selbstfremdheit der Kirchen im Kontext eskalierender Kulturkämpfe ● Politik der Differenz vs. Anerkennung im Zeichen radikaler Alterität ● Ernst Troeltsch und Max Weber – Religionstheorie in transatlantischer Perspektive ● ‚Neuer Atheismus‘ und ‚Kreationismus‘ – Transatlantische Zwillings-Phänomene ● Transatlantic Networks and the German-American Protestant Exchange ● Paul Tillichs Emigration in die Vereinigten Staaten und sein theologisches Reden über die Grenze ● Beobachtungen zum Weg von Leonardo Boff ● Sicherheitspolitischer Dialog zwischen transatlantischem Bündnis und dem Nahen Osten in Zeiten des geopolitischen Umstrukturierungsprozesses Die Herausgeber Prof. Dr. em. Dietmar Schössler war Hochschullehrer für Politik- und Sozialwissenschaften an den Universitäten Mannheim, Frankfurt am Main und München (Universität der Bundeswehr). Prof. Dr. Michael Plathow ist Hochschullehrer für Systematische Theologie an der Universität Heidelberg.

Political theory. --- International relations. --- Theology. --- Political Theory. --- International Relations Theory. --- Christian Theology.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This book examines the modes by which the grand theories of International Relations can be restructured at the level of meta-theory. It emphasizes the inability of grand theories to make sense of international relations in postcolonial societies and argues to engage in such restructuring in the domain of ontology. This is done by making a historical sociological defence toward adopting mid-level theories in IR. It is a critique of the meta-theoretical foundations of Kenneth Waltz's grand theory of neorealism, by pivoting itself upon the framework of postcolonial ontology. Dwelling upon Mohammed Ayoob’s mid-level theory of subaltern realism, it argues for undertaking the task of restructuring International Relations at the level of meta-theory, largely in the sphere of ontology. It explains how the thrust of grand theories such as neorealism, on ontological singularity can be circumvented. Owing to this, International Relations can experience a meta-theoretical transformation that may manifest in the broader engagement of the discipline itself, with the very conception of ontological multiplicity. Sanjeev Kumar H.M. is currently Professor of International Relations and Global Politics at the Department of Political Science, University of Delhi, India. .

International relations. --- Political science. --- Asia --- Philosophy. --- Postcolonialism. --- International Relations Theory. --- Political Theory. --- Asian Politics. --- Postcolonial Philosophy. --- Politics and government.