Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Since the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, critics have charged that the Federal Bureau of Investigation, while qualified to investigate terrorist incidents after the fact, is not well equipped enough to adequately gather and assess information to prevent attacks. More intrinsically, many believe that given a predominant and deeply rooted law enforcement and prosecutorial culture, the bureau may not be able to change operational focus toward dedicated counterterrorism intelligence gathering and analysis. To better inform debate, researchers analyzed the domestic security structures of

France. Direction de la surveillance du territoire. --- Great Britain. MI5. --- Intelligence service--Cross-cultural studies. --- Internal security--Cross-cultural studies. --- Terrorism--Prevention--Cross-cultural studies. --- Social Welfare & Social Work --- Social Sciences --- Criminology, Penology & Juvenile Delinquency --- Terrorism --- Intelligence service --- Internal security --- Prevention --- Great Britain. --- France. --- Canadian Security Intelligence Service. --- Australian Security Intelligence Organization. --- Security, Internal --- Counter intelligence --- Counterespionage --- Counterintelligence --- Intelligence community --- Secret police (Intelligence service) --- Acts of terrorism --- Attacks, Terrorist --- Global terrorism --- International terrorism --- Political terrorism --- Terror attacks --- Terrorist acts --- Terrorist attacks --- World terrorism --- ASIO --- Australia. --- Australian Security Intelligence Organisation --- Canada. --- Service canadien du renseignement de sécurité --- CSIS --- SCRS --- D.S.T. --- DST --- UK Security Service --- Imperial Security Intelligence Service (England) --- MI5 --- Insurgency --- Subversive activities --- Public administration --- Research --- Disinformation --- Secret service --- Direct action --- Political crimes and offenses --- Political violence --- Terror