Listing 1 - 3 of 3 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Damages --- -Interlocutory decisions --- -Interlocutory decrees --- Interlocutory judgments --- Interlocutory orders --- Judgments --- Injuries (Law) --- Measure of damages --- Accident law --- Compensation (Law) --- Obligations (Law) --- Personal injuries --- Set-off and counterclaim --- Torts --- Negligence --- Law and legislation --- Interlocutory decisions --- Interlocutory decrees
Choose an application
I. L'objet de la question préjudicielle.- II. La pratique de la question préjudicielle.
Public law. Constitutional law --- Law of civil procedure --- Belgium --- Prejudicial actions --- Question préjudicielle --- Belgique. --- Interlocutory decisions --- Arbitration and award --- 342.59 <493> --- #A0112A --- 323.2 Arbitragehof --- cour d'arbitrage --- droit public --- jurisprudence --- belgique --- droit --- Bevoegdheidsconflict tussen de machten. Overlegcomite. Belangenconflict.Verhouding wetgevende-uitvoerende macht. Arbitragehof--België --- arbitragehof --- publiek recht --- rechtspraak --- belgie --- recht --- 342.59 <493> Bevoegdheidsconflict tussen de machten. Overlegcomite. Belangenconflict.Verhouding wetgevende-uitvoerende macht. Arbitragehof--België --- Question préjudicielle --- Interlocutory decrees --- Interlocutory judgments --- Interlocutory orders --- Judgments --- Arbitral awards --- Awards and arbitration --- Commercial arbitration --- Civil procedure --- Commercial law --- Compromise (Law) --- Law and legislation --- Belgium. --- 323.2 Grondwettelijk Hof van België --- Interlocutory decisions - Belgium --- Arbitration and award - Belgium
Choose an application
This book compares the law on provisional measures of common law and civil law countries, the goal being to identify and compare their main advantages and disadvantages. The guiding concept is a well-known statement by the Justices of the US Supreme Court expressed in the famous Grupo Mexicano case, according to which the “age of slow-moving capital and comparatively immobile wealth” has now passed, and the 21st century requires a fresh look at the law of provisional measures. In the quest to find a model for interim relief, the Mareva Injunction, subsequently renamed the ‘Freezing Order’ in the English Civil Procedural Rules, is used as the benchmark to which each of the targeted systems discussed here is compared. This is because international scholarship, as well as e.g. the US Supreme Court, generally consider the Mareva Injunction to be the most effective and farthest-reaching provisional remedy. The analysis suggests that the Mareva Injunction / Freezing Order represents the type of relief that will most likely continue to dominate as the most efficient and farthest-reaching interim measure in the years to come.
Injunctions --- Interlocutory decisions --- Debtor and creditor --- Interlocutory decrees --- Interlocutory judgments --- Interlocutory orders --- Judgments --- Commercial law. --- Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law . --- Business Law. --- European Law. --- International Economic Law, Trade Law. --- Business --- Business law --- Commerce --- Law, Commercial --- Mercantile law --- Law --- Law merchant --- Maritime law --- Law and legislation --- Private international law. --- Conflict of laws. --- Law—Europe. --- International law. --- Trade. --- Law of nations --- Nations, Law of --- Public international law --- Choice of law --- Conflict of laws --- Intermunicipal law --- International law, Private --- International private law --- Private international law --- Legal polycentricity --- Civil law --- Comparative law. --- Trade regulation. --- Private International Law, International and Foreign Law, Comparative Law. --- Regulation of trade --- Regulatory reform --- Trade regulation --- Commercial law --- Consumer protection --- Deregulation --- Comparative jurisprudence --- Comparative legislation --- Jurisprudence, Comparative --- Law, Comparative --- Legislation, Comparative --- Europe.
Listing 1 - 3 of 3 |
Sort by
|