Listing 1 - 10 of 16 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Organizational sociology --- Institutional economics --- Associations, institutions, etc. --- Institutional economics. --- Organizational sociology. --- Management --- Management. --- institutional environment --- institutional economics --- social structure --- public governance --- Organization (Sociology) --- Organization theory --- Sociology of organizations --- Sociology --- Bureaucracy --- Economics --- Association management --- Institution management --- Institutions, associations, etc. --- Networks (Associations, institutions, etc.) --- Organizations --- Voluntary associations --- Voluntary organizations --- Social groups --- Voluntarism --- evolutionary economics
Choose an application
The causes and consequences of foreign direct investment (FDI) in developing countries remains a subject of debate among researchers and policymakers alike. The authors use international data and a new micro-data set of firms in thirteen Southern African Developing Countries (SADCs) to investigate the benefits and determinants of FDI in this region. FDI appears to have facilitated local development in the SADC region. Foreign firms tend to perform better than domestic firms, tend to be larger, are located in richer and better-governed countries and in countries with more competitive financial intermediaries, and they are more likely to export than domestic firms. They also exhibit positive spillover effects to domestic firms. Relying on a standard model to predict the country-level FDI inflows per capita, the authors find that SADC is attracting their expected level of FDI inflows, at least relative to its income level, human capital, demographic structure, institutions, and economic track record. There are some differences between SADC and the rest of the world in FDI behavior: in SADC, the income level is less important and openness more so. The authors use two comparison groups to compare with SADC to shed light on why other regions have attracted more FDI per capita than SADC. The factors that explain SADC's low FDI inflows are economic fundamentals (e.g., previous growth rates, average income, phone density, and the adult share of population).
Advanced economies --- Debt Markets --- Demographic --- Developing countries --- Economic development --- Economic Theory & Research --- Emerging Markets --- Finance and Financial Sector Development --- Financial intermediaries --- Firm performance --- Foreign capital --- Foreign Direct Investment --- Foreign firms --- Foreign ownership --- Growth rates --- Human capital --- Income --- Institutional environment --- International Economics and Trade --- Investment and Investment Climate --- Investment climate --- Macroeconomics and Economic Growth --- Private Sector Development --- Regional integration --- Sales growth --- Technology transfer --- Track record
Choose an application
There has been substantial research in recent years examining the regional evolution of economic growth across states in Mexico - with a particular focus on the post North American Free Trade Agreement period. There is also a vast literature using cross-country regressions to examine institutional determinants of economic growth, including government transparency, or "corruption," as a key institutional variable. This paper uses more recently available data for Mexican states to both update the general state convergence/divergence literature, and incorporate into the analysis more recently developed state level indicators of institutional factors related to government transparency. The authors do not find a systematic relationship between measures of government transparency and gross domestic product per capita growth in Mexico during 2001-2005; however, they do find that corruption is negatively associated with the level of state gross domestic product per capita. The contrasting results may imply that more years of data are necessary to be able to establish statistically significant relationships between state growth rates and measures of corruption.
Achieving Shared Growth --- Bribery --- Bureaucracy --- Corrupt Officials --- Corruption --- Corruption variable --- Country data --- Economic development --- Economic growth --- Economic performance --- Economic Theory & Research --- Good governance --- Governance --- Governance Indicators --- Growth rate --- Growth rates --- Income --- Institutional environment --- International level --- Macroeconomics and Economic Growth --- Political Economy --- Poverty Reduction --- Property rights --- Public Sector Corruption & Anticorruption Measures --- Public Sector Development --- Tax system --- Transparency --- Veto power
Choose an application
The causes and consequences of foreign direct investment (FDI) in developing countries remains a subject of debate among researchers and policymakers alike. The authors use international data and a new micro-data set of firms in thirteen Southern African Developing Countries (SADCs) to investigate the benefits and determinants of FDI in this region. FDI appears to have facilitated local development in the SADC region. Foreign firms tend to perform better than domestic firms, tend to be larger, are located in richer and better-governed countries and in countries with more competitive financial intermediaries, and they are more likely to export than domestic firms. They also exhibit positive spillover effects to domestic firms. Relying on a standard model to predict the country-level FDI inflows per capita, the authors find that SADC is attracting their expected level of FDI inflows, at least relative to its income level, human capital, demographic structure, institutions, and economic track record. There are some differences between SADC and the rest of the world in FDI behavior: in SADC, the income level is less important and openness more so. The authors use two comparison groups to compare with SADC to shed light on why other regions have attracted more FDI per capita than SADC. The factors that explain SADC's low FDI inflows are economic fundamentals (e.g., previous growth rates, average income, phone density, and the adult share of population).
Advanced economies --- Debt Markets --- Demographic --- Developing countries --- Economic development --- Economic Theory & Research --- Emerging Markets --- Finance and Financial Sector Development --- Financial intermediaries --- Firm performance --- Foreign capital --- Foreign Direct Investment --- Foreign firms --- Foreign ownership --- Growth rates --- Human capital --- Income --- Institutional environment --- International Economics and Trade --- Investment and Investment Climate --- Investment climate --- Macroeconomics and Economic Growth --- Private Sector Development --- Regional integration --- Sales growth --- Technology transfer --- Track record
Choose an application
There has been substantial research in recent years examining the regional evolution of economic growth across states in Mexico - with a particular focus on the post North American Free Trade Agreement period. There is also a vast literature using cross-country regressions to examine institutional determinants of economic growth, including government transparency, or "corruption," as a key institutional variable. This paper uses more recently available data for Mexican states to both update the general state convergence/divergence literature, and incorporate into the analysis more recently developed state level indicators of institutional factors related to government transparency. The authors do not find a systematic relationship between measures of government transparency and gross domestic product per capita growth in Mexico during 2001-2005; however, they do find that corruption is negatively associated with the level of state gross domestic product per capita. The contrasting results may imply that more years of data are necessary to be able to establish statistically significant relationships between state growth rates and measures of corruption.
Achieving Shared Growth --- Bribery --- Bureaucracy --- Corrupt Officials --- Corruption --- Corruption variable --- Country data --- Economic development --- Economic growth --- Economic performance --- Economic Theory & Research --- Good governance --- Governance --- Governance Indicators --- Growth rate --- Growth rates --- Income --- Institutional environment --- International level --- Macroeconomics and Economic Growth --- Political Economy --- Poverty Reduction --- Property rights --- Public Sector Corruption & Anticorruption Measures --- Public Sector Development --- Tax system --- Transparency --- Veto power
Choose an application
In all spheres of life, relationships among public and private organizations are built in order to deal with complex societal problems and to address economic challenges that cannot be dealt with by single organizations. Because of the interdependencies, interorganizational collaboration is essential, yet working across organizational boundaries is far from simple. It involves a multitude of different organizations, each having its own interests, perspectives, and identities while also varying in power and size. Further, the societal problems that are dealt with are often severe. This volume focuses on the relational complexities of interorganizational collaboration, captured by the term dynamics, referring to: (a) the social and psychological processes that occur when organizations and their representatives interact to engage in cross-boundary or collaborative work (e.g., trust and distrust, intergroup stereotyping and conflict, conflict avoidance, inclusion and exclusion of stakeholders, power dynamics), as well as (b) the development of these processes over time, in view of external and internal events and/or as a consequence of deliberate interventions to enhance collaborative success. The perspective put forward is largely psychological and sociological, both in terms of understanding the group and intergroup processes as well as efforts to intervene to develop collaborative relationships, based on action research and an organizational development approach.
Philosophy --- collaboration --- conflict --- participation --- multiparty systems --- group dynamics --- multilevel analysis --- dynamics --- boundaries --- change --- co-evolution --- meta-organization --- partnership --- institutional environment --- composition --- membership --- healthcare --- cross-sector partnerships --- institutional fields --- issue field --- power sources --- power strategies --- integrated care --- emotions --- emotional labor --- cross-boundary collaboration --- care professional --- patient --- client --- people with multiple complex problems --- health and social care --- social networks --- trust --- centrality --- relational approach --- inter-organizational collaboration --- multi-actor governance --- complexity leadership theory --- landfill mining --- leadership --- integration --- shared purpose --- accountability --- collaboration --- conflict --- participation --- multiparty systems --- group dynamics --- multilevel analysis --- dynamics --- boundaries --- change --- co-evolution --- meta-organization --- partnership --- institutional environment --- composition --- membership --- healthcare --- cross-sector partnerships --- institutional fields --- issue field --- power sources --- power strategies --- integrated care --- emotions --- emotional labor --- cross-boundary collaboration --- care professional --- patient --- client --- people with multiple complex problems --- health and social care --- social networks --- trust --- centrality --- relational approach --- inter-organizational collaboration --- multi-actor governance --- complexity leadership theory --- landfill mining --- leadership --- integration --- shared purpose --- accountability
Choose an application
The aim of this paper is to empirically explore the relationship between the quality of political institutions and the performance of regulation, an issue that has recently occupied much of the policy debate on the effectiveness of infrastructure industry reforms. Taking the view that political accountability is a key factor that links political structures and regulatory processes, the authors investigate, for the case of telecommunications, its impact on the performance of regulation in two time-series-cross-sectional data sets on 29 developing countries and 23 industrial countries covering the period 1985-99. In addition to confirming some well documented results on the positive role of regulatory governance in infrastructure industries, the authors provide empirical evidence on the impact of the quality of political institutions and their modes of functioning on regulatory performance. The analysis of the data sets shows that the (positive) effect of political accountability on the performance of regulation is stronger in developing countries. An important policy implication of this finding is that future reforms in these countries should give due attention to the development of politically accountable systems.
Accountability Variables --- Debt Markets --- E-Business --- Economic Development --- Economic Incentives --- Economic Theory and Research --- Emerging Markets --- Finance and Financial Sector Development --- Governance --- Governance Indicators --- Growth --- Growth Performance --- Infrastructure Economics and Finance --- Infrastructure Regulation --- Institutional Environment --- Institutional Quality --- Macroeconomics and Economic Growth --- Market Economies --- Measurement --- National Governance --- Policy Implications --- Political Accountability --- Political Economy --- Political Institutions --- Political Structures --- Politics --- Private Sector Development --- Public Sector Corruption and Anticorruption Measures --- Regulation --- Regulatory Institutions --- Science and Technology Development --- Service --- Services --- Statistical and Mathematical Sciences
Choose an application
In all spheres of life, relationships among public and private organizations are built in order to deal with complex societal problems and to address economic challenges that cannot be dealt with by single organizations. Because of the interdependencies, interorganizational collaboration is essential, yet working across organizational boundaries is far from simple. It involves a multitude of different organizations, each having its own interests, perspectives, and identities while also varying in power and size. Further, the societal problems that are dealt with are often severe. This volume focuses on the relational complexities of interorganizational collaboration, captured by the term dynamics, referring to: (a) the social and psychological processes that occur when organizations and their representatives interact to engage in cross-boundary or collaborative work (e.g., trust and distrust, intergroup stereotyping and conflict, conflict avoidance, inclusion and exclusion of stakeholders, power dynamics), as well as (b) the development of these processes over time, in view of external and internal events and/or as a consequence of deliberate interventions to enhance collaborative success. The perspective put forward is largely psychological and sociological, both in terms of understanding the group and intergroup processes as well as efforts to intervene to develop collaborative relationships, based on action research and an organizational development approach.
Philosophy --- collaboration --- conflict --- participation --- multiparty systems --- group dynamics --- multilevel analysis --- dynamics --- boundaries --- change --- co-evolution --- meta-organization --- partnership --- institutional environment --- composition --- membership --- healthcare --- cross-sector partnerships --- institutional fields --- issue field --- power sources --- power strategies --- integrated care --- emotions --- emotional labor --- cross-boundary collaboration --- care professional --- patient --- client --- people with multiple complex problems --- health and social care --- social networks --- trust --- centrality --- relational approach --- inter-organizational collaboration --- multi-actor governance --- complexity leadership theory --- landfill mining --- leadership --- integration --- shared purpose --- accountability --- n/a
Choose an application
The aim of this paper is to empirically explore the relationship between the quality of political institutions and the performance of regulation, an issue that has recently occupied much of the policy debate on the effectiveness of infrastructure industry reforms. Taking the view that political accountability is a key factor that links political structures and regulatory processes, the authors investigate, for the case of telecommunications, its impact on the performance of regulation in two time-series-cross-sectional data sets on 29 developing countries and 23 industrial countries covering the period 1985-99. In addition to confirming some well documented results on the positive role of regulatory governance in infrastructure industries, the authors provide empirical evidence on the impact of the quality of political institutions and their modes of functioning on regulatory performance. The analysis of the data sets shows that the (positive) effect of political accountability on the performance of regulation is stronger in developing countries. An important policy implication of this finding is that future reforms in these countries should give due attention to the development of politically accountable systems.
Accountability Variables --- Debt Markets --- E-Business --- Economic Development --- Economic Incentives --- Economic Theory and Research --- Emerging Markets --- Finance and Financial Sector Development --- Governance --- Governance Indicators --- Growth --- Growth Performance --- Infrastructure Economics and Finance --- Infrastructure Regulation --- Institutional Environment --- Institutional Quality --- Macroeconomics and Economic Growth --- Market Economies --- Measurement --- National Governance --- Policy Implications --- Political Accountability --- Political Economy --- Political Institutions --- Political Structures --- Politics --- Private Sector Development --- Public Sector Corruption and Anticorruption Measures --- Regulation --- Regulatory Institutions --- Science and Technology Development --- Service --- Services --- Statistical and Mathematical Sciences
Choose an application
In all spheres of life, relationships among public and private organizations are built in order to deal with complex societal problems and to address economic challenges that cannot be dealt with by single organizations. Because of the interdependencies, interorganizational collaboration is essential, yet working across organizational boundaries is far from simple. It involves a multitude of different organizations, each having its own interests, perspectives, and identities while also varying in power and size. Further, the societal problems that are dealt with are often severe. This volume focuses on the relational complexities of interorganizational collaboration, captured by the term dynamics, referring to: (a) the social and psychological processes that occur when organizations and their representatives interact to engage in cross-boundary or collaborative work (e.g., trust and distrust, intergroup stereotyping and conflict, conflict avoidance, inclusion and exclusion of stakeholders, power dynamics), as well as (b) the development of these processes over time, in view of external and internal events and/or as a consequence of deliberate interventions to enhance collaborative success. The perspective put forward is largely psychological and sociological, both in terms of understanding the group and intergroup processes as well as efforts to intervene to develop collaborative relationships, based on action research and an organizational development approach.
collaboration --- conflict --- participation --- multiparty systems --- group dynamics --- multilevel analysis --- dynamics --- boundaries --- change --- co-evolution --- meta-organization --- partnership --- institutional environment --- composition --- membership --- healthcare --- cross-sector partnerships --- institutional fields --- issue field --- power sources --- power strategies --- integrated care --- emotions --- emotional labor --- cross-boundary collaboration --- care professional --- patient --- client --- people with multiple complex problems --- health and social care --- social networks --- trust --- centrality --- relational approach --- inter-organizational collaboration --- multi-actor governance --- complexity leadership theory --- landfill mining --- leadership --- integration --- shared purpose --- accountability --- n/a
Listing 1 - 10 of 16 | << page >> |
Sort by
|