Listing 1 - 10 of 14 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Two source hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- 226.1 --- Hypothesis, Two document (Synoptics criticism) --- Hypothesis, Two source (Synoptics criticism) --- Hypothesis, Two sources (Synoptics criticism) --- Two document hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Two sources hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Q hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Synoptic problem --- Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- 226.1 Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle
Choose an application
La Source Q (Die Quelle, en allemand) est le document - perdu- que les évangélistes Matthieu ei Luc avaient selon toute probabilité sous les yeux, à côté de l'évangile selon Marc, lorsqu'ils rédigeaient leurs écrits respectifs. Ce document Q a récemment fait l'objet d'une tentative de reconstitution. En voici une traduction nouvelle en français, accompagné d'un commentaire suivi. A travers ce texte, c'est un tout autre christianisme qui est ainsi mis à jour.
Q hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Two source hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- 226.1 --- Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- 226.1 Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- Hypothesis, Two document (Synoptics criticism) --- Hypothesis, Two source (Synoptics criticism) --- Hypothesis, Two sources (Synoptics criticism) --- Two document hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Two sources hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Synoptic problem --- Logia source (Synoptics criticism) --- Q document (Synoptics criticism) --- Sayings source (Synoptics criticism)
Choose an application
Two source hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Q hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- 226.1 --- 226.1 Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- Logia source (Synoptics criticism) --- Q document (Synoptics criticism) --- Sayings source (Synoptics criticism) --- Synoptic problem --- Hypothesis, Two document (Synoptics criticism) --- Hypothesis, Two source (Synoptics criticism) --- Hypothesis, Two sources (Synoptics criticism) --- Two document hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Two sources hypothesis (Synoptics criticism)
Choose an application
Q hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Two source hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- 226.1 --- Hypothesis, Two document (Synoptics criticism) --- Hypothesis, Two source (Synoptics criticism) --- Hypothesis, Two sources (Synoptics criticism) --- Two document hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Two sources hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Synoptic problem --- Logia source (Synoptics criticism) --- Q document (Synoptics criticism) --- Sayings source (Synoptics criticism) --- Brieven van Paulus--(algemeen) --- Jesus Christ --- Bible NT. Gospels
Choose an application
Q hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Two source hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- 225*32 --- 226.1 --- Sermones, redevoeringen van Jezus: bergrede; zaligsprekingen; Onze Vader; antithesen --- Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- 226.1 Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- 225*32 Sermones, redevoeringen van Jezus: bergrede; zaligsprekingen; Onze Vader; antithesen --- Hypothesis, Two document (Synoptics criticism) --- Hypothesis, Two source (Synoptics criticism) --- Hypothesis, Two sources (Synoptics criticism) --- Two document hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Two sources hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Synoptic problem --- Logia source (Synoptics criticism) --- Q document (Synoptics criticism) --- Sayings source (Synoptics criticism)
Choose an application
"This study examines the relative plausibility of three contemporary synoptic gospel source-critical hypotheses, namely the Two-Document Hypothesis, the Two-Gospel Hypothesis, and the Ferrer Hypothesis. Specific attention is paid to the implied redaction of the Gospel miracle traditions, which are evaluated through the lens of first-century Greco-Roman biographical and narrative conventions"--
Synoptic problem. --- Two source hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- 226.1 --- 226.1 Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- Q hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Synoptic problem --- Hypothesis, Two document (Synoptics criticism) --- Hypothesis, Two source (Synoptics criticism) --- Hypothesis, Two sources (Synoptics criticism) --- Two document hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Two sources hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Bible. --- Evangelie (Book of the New Testament) --- Fukuinsho (Books of the New Testament) --- Gospels (Books of the New Testament) --- Gospels, Synoptic (Books of the New Testament) --- Synoptic Gospels (Books of the New Testament) --- Criticism, Redaction.
Choose an application
This volume contains the proceedings of an international Q symposium held at Graz University on July 20 - 23, 2011. The conference presented the current state of Q studies and spelled out their future directions through interpretations of particular texts and methodological reflections. One important thrust of the discussions during the conference concerned the literary character of Q: Is it possible or indeed necessary to reconstruct the wording of Q? How coherent, 'finished' and scribalized was Q? Other central topics related to the social and theological importance of Q: What were the contexts of the composition of Q? How can the relationships between Q and ancient Judaism(s) and nascent Christ groups be described? Particular attention was given to the issues of (1) oral and scribal factors, (2) narratological and intertextual approaches, (3) reconstruction and redaction criticism, (4) ethos and Torah, (5) Q and the Gospel of Matthew, (6) Q and the Gospel of John and (7) new approaches to the Q hypothesis and the Synoptic Problem.
Q hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Two source hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- 226.1 --- 226.1 Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- Hypothesis, Two document (Synoptics criticism) --- Hypothesis, Two source (Synoptics criticism) --- Hypothesis, Two sources (Synoptics criticism) --- Two document hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Two sources hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Synoptic problem --- Logia source (Synoptics criticism) --- Q document (Synoptics criticism) --- Sayings source (Synoptics criticism) --- Bible. --- Evangelie (Book of the New Testament) --- Fukuinsho (Books of the New Testament) --- Gospels (Books of the New Testament) --- Gospels, Synoptic (Books of the New Testament) --- Synoptic Gospels (Books of the New Testament) --- Criticism, interpretation, etc. --- Bible
Choose an application
Two source hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Griesbach hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- 225.06*2 --- Gebruik van Oud Testament in Nieuw Testament. Testimonia --- 225.06*2 Gebruik van Oud Testament in Nieuw Testament. Testimonia --- Hypothesis, Two document (Synoptics criticism) --- Hypothesis, Two source (Synoptics criticism) --- Hypothesis, Two sources (Synoptics criticism) --- Two document hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Two sources hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Q hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Synoptic problem --- Hypothesis, Griesbach (Synoptics criticism) --- Matthean priority (Synoptics criticism) --- Priority of Matthew (Synoptics criticism) --- Bible. --- Antico Testamento --- Hebrew Bible --- Hebrew Scriptures --- Kitve-ḳodesh --- Miḳra --- Old Testament --- Palaia Diathēkē --- Pentateuch, Prophets, and Hagiographa --- Sean-Tiomna --- Stary Testament --- Tanakh --- Tawrāt --- Torah, Neviʼim, Ketuvim --- Torah, Neviʼim u-Khetuvim --- Velho Testamento --- Quotations in the New Testament.
Choose an application
For a long time mainstream gospel scholarship has assumed that the so-called Q material (the "double tradition") in Matthew and Luke represents a document or tradition that was almost exclusively orientated towards the sayings of Jesus of Nazareth, with little interest in a narrative about him. This book argues, on the contrary, that the narrative material in the double tradition existed from the very beginning within a coherent Jesus narrative that ran from his baptism to his passion. Far from being inserted by Matthew and Luke into the framework of Mark, the double tradition is structured on the very same narrative framework as the Gospel of Mark (a framework that predates Mark). Conventional dichotomies in gospel origins, the historical Jesus, and the history of early Christianity are thus drawn into question. Lange Zeit ist die Forschung zu den Evangelien davon ausgegangen, daß das sog. Q-Material im Matthäus- und Lukasevangelium eine Quelle oder eine Tradition darstellt, die fast ausschließlich an den Logien Jesu von Nazareth interessiert war, kaum dagegen an Erzählungen über ihn. Die vorliegende Studie zeigt demgegenüber, daß das Erzählgut in Q von Anfang an existierte, und zwar innerhalb einer Jesus-Erzählung, die von seiner Taufe bis zur Passion reichte. Dieser Erzählrahmen gleicht demjenigen von Markus, ist aber älter. Matthäus und Lukas haben das Q-Material keineswegs in den Erzählrahmen von Markus eingefügt. Die bisherigen differenzierten Forschungspositionen zur Entstehung der Evangelien, zum historischen Jesus und zur Geschichte des frühen Christentums stehen dabei zur Diskussion.
Synoptic problem --- Two source hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Q hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- 225.015 --- Nieuw Testament: literaire kritiek; authenticiteit; bronnenstudie --- Theses --- 225.015 Nieuw Testament: Formgeschichte; Traditionsgeschichte; Redaktionsgeschichte --- 225.015 Nieuw Testament: literaire kritiek; authenticiteit; bronnenstudie --- Nieuw Testament: Formgeschichte; Traditionsgeschichte; Redaktionsgeschichte --- Hypothesis, Two document (Synoptics criticism) --- Hypothesis, Two source (Synoptics criticism) --- Hypothesis, Two sources (Synoptics criticism) --- Two document hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Two sources hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Logia source (Synoptics criticism) --- Q document (Synoptics criticism) --- Sayings source (Synoptics criticism) --- Bible. --- Evangelie (Book of the New Testament) --- Fukuinsho (Books of the New Testament) --- Gospels (Books of the New Testament) --- Gospels, Synoptic (Books of the New Testament) --- Synoptic Gospels (Books of the New Testament) --- Criticism, interpretation, etc. --- Synoptic problem.
Choose an application
"This book discusses the composition of the synoptic gospels from the perspective of the Farrer hypothesis, a view that posits that Mark was written first, that Matthew used Mark as a source, and that Luke used both Mark and Matthew. All of the articles in the volume are written in support of the Farrer hypothesis, with the exception of the final chapter, which criticizes these articles from the perspective of the reigning Two-Source theory. The contributors engage the synoptic problem with a more refined understanding of the options set before each of the evangelists pointing towards a deepened understanding of how works were compiled in the first and early second centuries CE. The contributors include Andris Abakuks, Stephen Carlson, Eric Eve, Mark Goodacre, Heather Gorman, John S. Kloppenborg, David Landry, Mark Matson, Ken Olson, Michael Pahl, Jeffrey Peterson, and John C. Poirier."-- This book discusses the composition of the synoptic gospels from the perspective of the Farrer hypothesis, a view that posits that Mark was written first, that Matthew used Mark as a source, and that Luke used both Mark and Matthew. All of the articles in the volume are written in support of the Farrer hypothesis, with the exception of the final chapter, which criticizes these articles from the perspective of the reigning Two-Source theory. The contributors engage the synoptic problem with a more refined understanding of the options set before each of the evangelists pointing towards a deepened understanding of how works were compiled in the first and early second centuries CE. The contributors include Andris Abakuks, Stephen Carlson, Eric Eve, Mark Goodacre, Heather Gorman, John S. Kloppenborg, David Landry, Mark Matson, Ken Olson, Michael Pahl, Jeffrey Peterson, and John C. Poirier
Synoptic problem. --- Q hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Two source hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Bible --- Criticism, interpretation, etc --- 226.1 --- Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- 226.1 Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- Hypothesis, Two document (Synoptics criticism) --- Hypothesis, Two source (Synoptics criticism) --- Hypothesis, Two sources (Synoptics criticism) --- Two document hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Two sources hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Synoptic problem --- Logia source (Synoptics criticism) --- Q document (Synoptics criticism) --- Sayings source (Synoptics criticism) --- Bible. --- Evangelie (Book of the New Testament) --- Fukuinsho (Books of the New Testament) --- Gospels (Books of the New Testament) --- Gospels, Synoptic (Books of the New Testament) --- Synoptic Gospels (Books of the New Testament) --- Criticism, interpretation, etc. --- Marco (Book of the New Testament) --- Mark (Book of the New Testament) --- Markus (Book of the New Testament) --- Markusevangelium --- Vangelo di Marco --- Book of Mark
Listing 1 - 10 of 14 | << page >> |
Sort by
|