Listing 1 - 10 of 40 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
International movements --- History of the law --- Criminal law. Criminal procedure --- United Kingdom --- Netherlands --- Hate speech --- Defamation against groups --- Group defamation --- Group libel --- Racist speech --- Speech, Hate --- Libel and slander --- England --- Wales --- Discours de haine --- Racisme dans le langage --- Études comparatives
Choose an application
Blasphemy --- Discrimination --- Hate speech --- Law and legislation --- Criminal provisions. --- Criminal provisions --- Defamation against groups --- Group defamation --- Group libel --- Racist speech --- Speech, Hate --- Libel and slander --- Bias --- Interpersonal relations --- Minorities --- Toleration --- Freedom of speech --- Offenses against religion --- Law and legislation&delete&
Choose an application
Hate speech law can be found throughout the world. But it is also the subject of numerous principled arguments, both for and against. These principles invoke a host of morally relevant features (e.g., liberty, health, autonomy, security, non-subordination, the absence of oppression, human dignity, the discovery of truth, the acquisition of knowledge, self-realization, human excellence, civic dignity, cultural diversity and choice, recognition of cultural identity, intercultural dialogue, participation in democratic self-government, being subject only to legitimate rule) and practical considerations (e.g., efficacy, the least restrictive alternative, chilling effects). The book develops and then critically examines these various principled arguments. It also attempts to de-homogenize hate speech law into different clusters of laws/regulations/codes that constrain uses of hate speech, so as to facilitate a more nuanced examination of the principled arguments.
Hate speech --- Defamation against groups --- Group defamation --- Group libel --- Racist speech --- Speech, Hate --- Libel and slander --- Criminal law --- Law and legislation. --- Philosophy. --- Philosophy --- Free speech --- Speech regulation --- Speech law --- Philosophy of law --- Political philosophy --- Defamation --- Discrimination --- Harassment
Choose an application
Since the end of World War II, the balance between freedom of expression and the desire to deter racist speech has gradually tipped toward the latter throughout much of the Western world. This text focuses on the tension between combating racism and protecting freedom of speech in the US, France, Britain, and Germany.
Hate speech --- Race discrimination --- Law and legislation --- Bias, Racial --- Discrimination, Racial --- Race bias --- Racial bias --- Racial discrimination --- Discrimination --- Defamation against groups --- Group defamation --- Group libel --- Racist speech --- Speech, Hate --- Libel and slander
Choose an application
We all know that speech can be harmful. But what are the harms and how exactly does the speech in question brings those harms about? Mary Kate McGowan identifies a previously overlooked mechanism by which speech constitutes, rather than merely causes, harm. She argues that speech constitutes harm when it enacts a norm that prescribes that harm. McGowan illustrates this theory by considering many categories of speech including sexist remarks, racist hate speech, pornography, verbal triggers for stereotype threat, micro-aggressions, political dog whistles, slam poetry, and even the hanging of posters. 'Just Words' explores a variety of harms - such as oppression, subordination, discrimination, domination, harassment, and marginalisation - and ways in which these harms can be remedied.
Sociolinguistics --- Philosophy of language --- Oral communication --- Sociolinguistics. --- Hate speech. --- Social aspects. --- Oral communication - Social aspects. --- Hate speech --- Defamation against groups --- Group defamation --- Group libel --- Racist speech --- Speech, Hate --- Libel and slander --- Language and culture --- Linguistics --- Sociology --- Integrational linguistics (Oxford school)
Choose an application
A fundamental precept of all liberal democracies is a commitment to free speech. However, democracies differ fundamentally when addressing the constitutionality of laws regulating certain kinds of speech. In the United States, the commitment to free speech in the First Amendment has been held by the Supreme Court to protect the public expression of the most noxious racist ideology and hence to render unconstitutional even narrow restrictions on hate speech. In contrast, governments have been accorded considerable leeway to restrict racist and other extreme expression in almost every other democracy, including Canada, the United Kingdom and other European countries. This book considers the constitutionality of hate speech regulation, and examines how liberal democracies have adopted fundamental differences in the way they respond to racist or extreme expressions. What accounts for the marked differences in attitude towards the constitutionality of hate speech regulation? Does hate speech regulation violate the core free speech principle constitutive of democracy? Has the traditional US position on extreme expressions justifiably not found favour elsewhere? Should, or could, other values such as the commitment to equality or dignity legitimately override the right to free speech in some circumstances? This collection of papers from some of the top free speech thinkers and writers today attempts to analyse and answer some of these fundamental questions that confront liberal democracies faced with extreme expressions.
Freedom of speech --- Hate speech --- Freedom of speech. --- Hate speech. --- Defamation against groups --- Group defamation --- Group libel --- Racist speech --- Speech, Hate --- Libel and slander --- Free speech --- Liberty of speech --- Speech, Freedom of --- Civil rights --- Freedom of expression --- Assembly, Right of --- Freedom of information --- Intellectual freedom --- Law and legislation
Choose an application
Blasphemy --- Hate speech --- Libel and slander --- Pornography --- Criminal provisions. --- Criminal provisions --- Calumny --- Defamation --- Slander --- Defamation against groups --- Group defamation --- Group libel --- Racist speech --- Speech, Hate --- Literature, Immoral --- Porn --- Porno --- Law and legislation --- Torts --- Freedom of speech --- Offenses against religion --- Sex-oriented businesses --- Erotica --- Sex industry
Choose an application
Human rights --- Hate speech. --- Hate speech --- Minorities --- Race discrimination --- Minority rights --- Defamation against groups --- Group defamation --- Group libel --- Racist speech --- Speech, Hate --- Libel and slander --- Legal status, laws, etc --- Law and legislation --- Law and legislation. --- Legal status, laws, etc. --- Racism --- Discrimination --- Racisme --- Droits de l'homme (Droit international) --- Race discrimination Law and legislation --- Race discrimination - Law and legislation. --- Minorities - Legal status, laws, etc.
Choose an application
This title considers the constitutionality of hate speech regulation, and examines how liberal democracies have adopted fundamental differences in the way they respond to racist or extreme expressions.
Freedom of speech --- Hate speech --- Law, Politics & Government --- Human Rights --- Defamation against groups --- Group defamation --- Group libel --- Racist speech --- Speech, Hate --- Libel and slander --- Free speech --- Liberty of speech --- Speech, Freedom of --- Civil rights --- Freedom of expression --- Assembly, Right of --- Freedom of information --- Intellectual freedom --- Law and legislation
Choose an application
A comprehensive examination of free speech under the Indian Constitution. It traces the development of free speech law from the colonial period up to present-day controversies, covering areas such as public order, obscenity, hate speech, defamation etc.
Freedom of speech --- Hate speech --- Libel and slander --- Law - Africa, Asia, Pacific & Antarctica --- Law - Non-U.S. --- Law, Politics & Government --- Free speech --- Liberty of speech --- Speech, Freedom of --- Civil rights --- Freedom of expression --- Assembly, Right of --- Freedom of information --- Intellectual freedom --- Calumny --- Defamation --- Slander --- Torts --- Defamation against groups --- Group defamation --- Group libel --- Racist speech --- Speech, Hate --- Law and legislation
Listing 1 - 10 of 40 | << page >> |
Sort by
|