Listing 1 - 3 of 3 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Public economics --- United States --- Contracting out --- Externalisation --- Impartition --- Outsourcing --- Uitbesteding --- Privatization --- Public contracts --- Government contractors --- Public contracts - United States. --- Contracting out - United States. --- Government contractors - United States. --- United States of America
Choose an application
International relations scholar Allison Stanger shows how contractors became an integral part of American foreign policy, often in scandalous ways-but also maintains that contractors aren't the problem; the absence of good government is. Outsourcing done right is, in fact, indispensable to America's interests in the information age.Stanger makes three arguments.The outsourcing of U.S. government activities is far greater than most people realize, has been very poorly managed, and has inadvertently militarized American foreign policy;Despite this mismanagement, public-private partnerships are here to stay, so we had better learn to do them right;With improved transparency and accountability, these partnerships can significantly extend the reach and effectiveness of U.S. efforts abroad.The growing use of private contractors predates the Bush Administration, and while his era saw the practice rise to unprecedented levels, Stanger argues that it is both impossible and undesirable to turn back the clock and simply re-absorb all outsourced functions back into government. Through explorations of the evolution of military outsourcing, the privatization of diplomacy, our dysfunctional homeland security apparatus, and the slow death of the U.S. Agency for International Development, Stanger shows that the requisite public-sector expertise to implement foreign policy no longer exists. The successful activities of charities and NGOs, coupled with the growing participation of multinational corporations in development efforts, make a new approach essential. Provocative and far-reaching, One Nation Under Contract presents a bold vision of what that new approach must be.
National security --- Privatization --- Contracting out --- Government contractors --- Homeland defense --- Homeland security --- United States --- Foreign relations --- National security - United States --- Privatization - United States --- Contracting out - United States --- Government contractors - United States --- United States - Foreign relations - 21st century
Choose an application
The use of armed private security contractors (PSCs) in the Iraq war has been unprecedented. Not only government agencies but also journalists, reconstruction contractors, and nongovernmental organizations frequently view them as a logical choice to fill their security needs, yet there have been a number of reports of PSCs committing serious, and sometimes fatal, abuses of power in Iraq. This study uses a systematic, empirically based survey of opinions of U.S. military and State Department personnel on the ground in Iraq to shed light on the following questions: To what extent are armed PSCs perceived to be imposing costs on the U.S. military effort? If so, are those costs tempered by positive contributions? How has the use of PSCs affected U.S. military operations in Operation Iraqi Freedom? While the military personnel did report some incidents of unnecessarily threatening, arrogant, or belligerent contractor behavior, the survey results indicate that neither the U.S. military nor State Department personnel appear to perceive PSCs to be "running wild" in Iraq. Moreover, respondents tended to consider PSCs a force multiplier rather than an additional strain on military troops, but both military and State Department respondents held mixed views regarding the contribution of armed contractors to U.S. foreign policy objectives.
Contracting out -- Iraq -- Evaluation. --- Contracting out -- United States -- Evaluation. --- Government contractors -- Iraq -- Evaluation. --- Government contractors -- United States -- Evaluation. --- Postwar reconstruction -- Iraq -- Evaluation. --- Private military companies -- Iraq -- Evaluation. --- Private security services -- Iraq -- Evaluation. --- Postwar reconstruction --- Private military companies --- Private security services --- Government contractors --- Contracting out --- Regions & Countries - Asia & the Middle East --- Middle East --- History & Archaeology --- Evaluation --- Evaluation. --- Contract services --- Contracting for services --- Outsourcing --- Services, Contracting for --- Public contractors --- Private security companies --- Private security industry --- Protection services, Private --- Security companies, Private --- Security industry, Private --- Security services, Private --- Military companies, Private --- Military contractors, Private --- Military service providers --- PMCs (Private military companies) --- Private military contractors --- Post-conflict reconstruction --- Reconstruction, Postwar --- Letting of contracts --- Privatization --- Public contracts --- Contractors --- Crime prevention --- Security systems --- Police, Private --- Security consultants --- Defense contracts --- Mercenary troops
Listing 1 - 3 of 3 |
Sort by
|