Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Preferential trade agreements are growing in number and deepening in content by incorporating disciplines that go beyond market access. They increasingly encompass non-trade-related disciplines as diverse as intellectual property rights, environment laws, or labor market regulations. Moreover, because investment is complementary to trade, preferential trade agreements provide relevant institutional frameworks to partner countries that wish to regulate their foreign investments. This paper studies the impact of deep trade agreements on foreign direct investment and examines three sub-questions. First, is the impact of trade agreements on foreign direct investment heterogeneous across types of business activity Second, is this impact heterogeneous across disciplines covered in the agreements Third, does the level of development of home and host countries matter for this impact The analysis exploits the World Bank's data set on the content of preferential trade agreement and data on announcements of bilateral greenfield investment at the activity level. The findings show that deep trade agreements matter for investment: every additional discipline in a preferential trade agreement increases foreign direct investment by 1.4 percent, on average. Deep agreements do not impact foreign direct investment in natural resources and extractive activities and have heterogeneous effects across manufacturing- and services-related activities. The results also reveal that disciplines that go beyond the mandate the World Trade Organization matter more for foreign direct investment. Disciplines related to investment liberalization and protection, intellectual property rights, or migration increase foreign direct investment, whereas disciplines on labor market regulations reduce investment. The results are mostly driven by investment between developed and developing countries.

Deep Integration --- Foreign Direct Investment --- Globalization and Financial Integration --- International Economics and Trade --- International Trade and Trade Rules --- Preferential Trade Agreements --- Regional Trade Agreement --- Regional Trade Integration --- Regionalism --- Trade Agreements --- Trade and Regional Integration --- Trade Finance and Investment

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

How does trade affect the design of preferential trade agreements (PTAs)? What is the role of global value chains (GVCs)? The authors answer these questions by empirically investigating the causal impact of gross and value-added trade on the depth of PTAs. To solve the critical issue of endogeneity of trade flows for trade policy, the identification strategy exploits a recent transportation shock: the sharp increase in the maximum size of container ships, which has more than tripled between 1995 and 2007. The key variation in our instrument hinges on the fact that only deep-water ports can accommodate new larger ships. The strategy is flexible enough to generate excludable instruments for different value-added components of exports. This allows us to assess how the design (depth) of PTAs is affected not only by gross exports but more specifically by GVC-trade as captured by indicators of trade in domestic and foreign value added. The authors find that trade occurring through GVCs increases the probability of forming deep PTAs, id est, agreements that include provisions that go beyond the coverage of the WTO. These GVC-trade effects are larger than those of gross exports, which include flows that are unrelated to GVCs. The results indicate that GVCs are one important driver of deep preferential liberalization.

Deep Integration --- Deep Trade Agreement --- Global Value Chain --- Globalization and Financial Integration --- International Economics and Trade --- International Trade --- International Trade and Trade Rules --- Preferential Trade Agreements --- Regional Integration --- Trade and Regional Integration --- Trade Policy

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Does a global value chain framework provide additional insights into the question of whether foreign direct investment is beneficial to host countries? The literature has found mixed results on whether foreign direct investment provides positive spillovers over and above mere financing. But the studies have focused on one country, or studies with an international focus tend to abstract from intersectoral linkages. By examining this question in the context of global value chains, this paper provides a much better understanding of the association as well as general validity. It harmonizes three major panel data sets: 1) the Multi-Regional Input-Output table for international input-output linkages, 2) the FDI Markets reports for greenfield foreign direct investment, and 3) the World Bank Enterprise Surveys for firm performance measures. The paper produces a rich panel data set from 2011 to 2017. The findings show that foreign direct investment has a positive effect on labor productivity in sectors and firms within those sectors. Moreover, global value chain participation plays a key role in shaping the foreign direct investment effects. Sectors with lower global value chain participation benefit more from foreign direct investment: doubling the foreign direct investment in those sectors results in an 8 percent productivity gain. The positive effect seems to be due to the increased competition created by foreign direct investment. Foreign direct investment spillovers also take place through domestic and foreign backward linkages, which means that foreign direct investment also has positive inter-sector and cross-border spillovers.

Enterprise Survey --- FDI --- Firm Performance --- Foreign Direct Investment --- Global Value Chain --- Global Value Chains and Business Clustering --- Globalization and Financial Integration --- Input-Output Linkages --- International Economics and Trade --- Labor Productivity --- Private Sector Development --- Spillovers

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Several new statistical tools and analytical frameworks have been developed recently to measure countries' and sectors' involvement in global value chains. Such wealth of methodologies reflects that different empirical questions call for distinct accounting methods, along with different levels of aggregation of trade flows. This paper is a companion to the conceptual framework presented in Borin and Mancini (2019). The paper describes a new Stata module, icio, that allows the user to construct the most appropriate measure for given empirical questions on trade in value-added and participation in global value chains of countries and sectors. By exploiting inter-country input-output tables, icio provides decompositions of aggregate, bilateral, and sectoral exports and imports according to the source and destination of their value-added content. As different measures are suited to address distinct economic questions, icio is designed to be flexible also in this respect.

Decomposition --- Export Competitiveness --- Exports --- Global Value Chain --- Global Value Chains and Business Clustering --- Globalization and Financial Integration --- Imports --- Industrial Economics --- Industry --- Input-Output Tables --- International Economics and Trade --- Private Sector Development --- Stata Module --- Trade Flows --- Value-Added

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Ethiopia's framework for managing its monetary and foreign exchange policy has relied on some standard instruments of financial repression. Over time, the framework has led to the buildup of large macro-financial imbalances. Exiting financial repression while maintaining macroeconomic stability would require solid control over the macro-financial flows and good anticipation of the immediate financial effects of the reform. The paper presents and quantifies such a gradual liberalization reform scenario of Ethiopia's monetary and foreign exchange system.

Currency --- Economic Policy, Institutions and Governance --- Finance and Development --- Finance and Financial Sector Development --- Financial Economics --- Financial Liberalization --- Fiscal and Monetary Policy --- Fiscal Policy --- Foreign Exchange --- Globalization and Financial Integration --- Government Policy --- International Economics and Trade --- International Financial Markets --- Macroeconomics and Economic Growth --- Monetary Policy --- Socialist Institutions