Listing 1 - 10 of 85 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Current research on media and the law has generally been atheoretical and contradictory. This volume explains why pretrial publicity is unlikely to affect the outcome of most jury trials, despite many experimental studies claiming to show the influence of publicity. It reviews existing literature on the topic and includes results from the authors' own research in an effort to answer four questions: *Does pretrial publicity bias the outcome of trials? *If it has an effect, under what conditions does this effect emerge? *What remedies should courts apply in situations whe
Choose an application
Public law. Constitutional law --- Mass communications --- Germany --- Publicity (Law) --- -Free press and fair trial --- -Television in police work --- -342.2 --- Police --- Fair trial and free press --- Prejudicial publicity and free press --- Pretrial publicity --- Publicity, Pretrial --- Trial by newspaper --- Fair trial --- Crime and the press --- Law and legislation --- -Staatsvormen --- 342.2 Staatsvormen --- Staatsvormen --- Free press and fair trial --- Television in police work --- 342.2
Choose an application
Newspaper court reporting --- Mass media --- Contempt of court. --- Free press and fair trial
Choose an application
Free press and fair trial --- Freedom of speech --- Freedom of the press
Choose an application
Crime and the press. --- Free press and fair trial. --- Discourse analysis.
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
Whilst paying lip service to the importance of public access to court proceedings and its corollary of unfettered media reporting,a trawl through common law jurisdictions reveals that judges and legislators have been responsible for substantial inroads into the ideal of open justice. Outside of the US, judges and legislators have long subordinated media freedom to report and comment upon matters relating to the administration of justice in order to safeguard the fairness of individual proceedings, public confidence in the administration of justice more generally or even individual privacy concerns. The subject matter of this book is a comparative treatment of constitutional protection for open justice. Focusing on developments in the legal systems of the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada and Australia, the monograph draws upon the constitutionalization of expression interests across the common law world to engage in a much needed re-assessment of the basis and extent of permissible restraints on speech
Courts. --- Freedom of speech. --- Freedom of the press. --- Free press and fair trial. --- Privacy, Right of.
Choose an application
Choose an application
Products liability --- Drugs --- Pharmacy --- Thalidomide --- Free press and fair trial --- Law and legislation --- Thalidomide. --- Products liability - Drugs - Great Britain --- Drugs - Law and legislation - Great Britain --- Pharmacy - Law and legislation - Great Britain --- Free press and fair trial - Great Britain
Listing 1 - 10 of 85 | << page >> |
Sort by
|