Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Africa South of the Sahara --- Financial Support. --- Economic assistance --- Aide économique

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

International finance --- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development --- Financial institutions, International --- Financial Support Fund --- -AA / International- internationaal --- 382.257 --- 333.432.8 --- 334.13 --- -332.15 --- International financial institutions --- Internationale liquiditeiten. --- Internationale monetaire organisatie. Internationaal Muntfonds. Algemene leningovereenkomsten. --- OESO. --- Financial Support Fund. --- 332.15 --- AA / International- internationaal --- Internationale monetaire organisatie. Internationaal Muntfonds. Algemene leningovereenkomsten --- OESO --- Internationale liquiditeiten --- Financial institutions, International - OECD countries

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

"The enactment of the America COMPETES Act in 2006 (and its reauthorization in 2010), the increase in research expenditures under the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), and President Obama's general emphasis on the contribution of science and technology to economic growth have all heightened interest in the role of scientific and engineering research in creating jobs, generating innovative technologies, spawning new industries, improving health, and producing other economic and societal benefits. Along with this interest has come a renewed emphasis on a question that has been asked for decades: Can the impacts and practical benefits of research to society be measured either quantitatively or qualitatively? On April 18-19, 2011, the Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy (STEP) and the Committee on Science, Engineering and Public Policy (COSEPUP) of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine, held a workshop to examine this question. The workshop sought to assemble the range of work that has been done in measuring research outcomes and to provide a forum to discuss its method. The workshop was motivated by a 2009 letter from Congressman Rush Holt (D-New Jersey). He asked the National Academies to look into a variety of complex and interconnected issues, such as the short-term and long-term economic and non-economic impact of federal research funding, factors that determine whether federally funded research discoveries result in economic benefits, and quantification of the impacts of research on national security, the environment, health, education, public welfare, and decision making. Measuring the impacts of federal investments in research provides the key observations and suggestions made by the speakers at the workshop and during the discussions that followed the formal presentations."--Publisher's description.

Federal aid to research - United States. --- Federal aid to research --- Science and state --- Education and state --- Financing, Organized --- Financial Support --- Economics --- Health Care Economics and Organizations --- Health Care --- Research Support as Topic --- Financing, Government --- Physical Sciences & Mathematics --- Sciences - General

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This paper proposes a new method for ex ante analysis of the poverty impacts arising from policy reforms. Three innovations underlie this approach. The first is the estimation of a global demand system using a combination of micro-data from household surveys and macro-data from the International Comparisons Project (ICP). Estimation is undertaken in a manner that reconciles these two sources of information, explicitly recognizing that per capita national demands are an aggregation of the disaggregated, individual household demands. The second innovation relates to a methodology for post-estimation calibration of the global demand system, giving rise to country-specific demand systems and an associated expenditure function which, when aggregated across the expenditure distribution, reproduce observed per capita budget shares exactly. This leads to the third innovation, which is the establishment of a unique poverty level of utility and an appropriately modified set of Foster-Greer-Thorbecke poverty measures. With these tools in hand, the authors are able to calculate the change in the head-count of poverty, poverty gap, and squared poverty gap arising from policy reforms, where the poverty measures are derived using a unique poverty level of utility, rather than an income or expenditure-based measure. They use these techniques with a demand system for food, other nondurables and services estimated using a combination of 1996 ICP data set and national expenditure distribution data. Calibration is demonstrated for three countries for which household survey expenditure data are used during estimation-Indonesia, the Philippines and Thailand. To show the usefulness of these calibrated models for policy analysis, the authors assess the effects of an assumed 5 percent food price rise as might be realized in the wake of a multilateral trade agreement. Results illustrate the important role of subsistence expenditures at lowest income levels, but of discretionary expenditure at higher income levels. The welfare analysis underscores the relatively large impact of the price hike on poorer households, while a modified Foster-Greer-Thorbecke poverty measure shows that the 5 percent price rise increases the incidence and intensity of poverty in all three cases, although the specific effects vary considerably by country.

Debt Markets --- Economic Theory and Research --- Expenditure --- Expenditures --- Finance and Financial Sector Development --- Financial crisis --- Financial support --- Food and Beverage Industry --- Income levels --- Industry --- International Bank --- International trade --- Macroeconomics and Economic Growth --- Micro-data --- Price change --- Price changes

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

July 2000 - This study of an important class of investors-U.S. mutual funds-finds that mutual funds do engage in momentum trading (buying winners and selling losers). They also engage in contagion trading strategies (selling assets from one country when asset prices fall in another). Kaminsky, Lyons, and Schmukler address the trading strategies of mutual funds in emerging markets. The data set they develop permits analyses of these strategies at the level of individual portfolios. A methodologically novel feature of their analysis: they disentangle the behavior of fund managers from that of investors. For both managers and investors, they strongly reject the null hypothesis of no momentum trading. Funds' momentum trading is positive: they systematically buy winners and sell losers. Contemporaneous momentum trading (buying current winners and selling current losers) is stronger during crises, and stronger for fund investors than for fund managers. Lagged momentum trading (buying past winners and selling past losers) is stronger during noncrises, and stronger for fund managers. Investors also engage in contagion trading-selling assets from one country when asset prices fall in another. These findings are based on data about mutual funds that represent only 10 percent of the market capitalization in the countries considered. Were it a larger share of the market, finding counterparties for their trades (the investors who buy when they sell and sell when they buy) would be difficult-and the premise that funds respond to contemporaneous returns rather than causing them would become tenuous. This paper-a product of Macroeconomics and Growth, Development Research Group-is part of a larger effort in the group to understand capital flows to developing countries. The study was funded by the Bank's Research Support Budget under the research project Mutual Fund Investment in Developing Countries. The authors may be contacted at graciela@gwu.edu, lyons@haas.berkeley.edu, or sschmukler@worldbank.org.

Budget --- Debt Markets --- Emerging Market --- Emerging Markets --- Finance and Financial Sector Development --- Financial Crisis --- Financial Support --- Fund Managers --- Hedge --- Hedge Funds --- Interest --- Investor --- Investors --- Lending --- Mutual Fund --- Mutual Fund Strategies --- Mutual Funds --- Pension --- Pension Funds --- Portfolio --- Trading --- Warrants