Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Although there has been research looking at the relationship between the structure of the financial system and economic growth, much less work has dealt with the importance of bank-based versus market-based financial systems for poverty and income distribution. Empirical evidence has indicated that the structure of the financial system has little relevance for economic growth, suggesting that the same could be true for poverty since growth is an important driver in reducing poverty. Some theories, however, claim that, by reducing information and transaction costs, the development of bank-based financial systems could exert a particularly large impact on the poor. This paper looks at a sample of 47 developing economies from 1984 through 2008. The results suggest that when institutions are weak, bank-based financial systems are better at reducing poverty and, as institutions develop, market-based financial systems can turn out to be beneficial for the poor.

Access to Finance --- Banks & Banking Reform --- Debt Markets --- Developing countries --- Economic Theory & Research --- Emerging Markets --- Finance and Financial Sector Development --- Financial development --- Financial structure --- Income distribution --- Macroeconomics and Economic Growth --- Poverty alleviation

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This paper combines firm-level data from 89 countries with updated country-level data on financial structure, and uses two estimation approaches. It finds that in low-income countries, labor growth is swifter in countries with a higher level of private credit/gross domestic product; the positive effect of bank credit is especially pronounced in industries that depend heavily on external finance; and banking development is positively associated with more physical and human capital investment. These findings are consistent with predictions from new structural economics. In high-income countries, labor growth rates are increasing in the level of stock market capitalization, which is also consistent with predictions from new structural economics, although the analysis is unable to provide evidence that the association is causal. It finds no evidence that small-scale firms in low-income countries benefit most from private credit market development. Rather, the labor growth rates of larger, capital-intensive firms increase more with the level of private credit market development, a finding consistent with the history-based political economy view that banking systems in low-income countries serve the interests of the elite, rather than providing broad-based access to financial services.

Access to Finance --- Banks --- Banks & Banking Reform --- Capital markets --- Debt Markets --- Economic development --- Economic Theory & Research --- Emerging Markets --- Finance and Financial Sector Development --- Financial development --- Financial structure --- Private Sector Development

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

January 2000 - In Bulgaria and other transition economies, liquidity constraints and hence access to external funds must be seen in the context of soft budget constraints and the financial system's failure to enforce the efficient allocation of funds. Liquidity constraints in Bulgaria may be seen as a sign of financial weakness. Budina, Garretsen, and de Jong use firm level data on Bulgaria to investigate the impact of liquidity constraints on firms' investment performance. Internal funds are an important determinant of investment in most industrial economies. The authors use a simple accelerator model of investment to test whether liquidity constraints are relevant in Bulgaria's case. Their estimates are based on data for 1993-95, before Bulgaria's financial crisis of 1996-97. It turns out that Bulgarian firms are liquidity-constrained and that firms' size and financial structure help to distinguish between firms that are more and less liquidity-constrained. In the authors' view, liquidity constraints in transition economies should be interpreted in different ways than those in industrial economies. In Bulgaria, liquidity constraints and hence access to external funds should be seen in the context of soft budget constraints and the financial system's failure to enforce the efficient allocation of funds. The relationship between liquidity constraints and firm characteristics may actually be the opposite of what is normally the case in industrial countries. In Bulgaria, lack of liquidity constraints may be a sign of financial weakness. This paper - a product of Macroeconomics and Growth, Development Research Group - is part of a larger effort in the group to study transition economies. The authors may be contacted at nbudina@worldbank.org, h.garretsen@bw.kun.nl or e.dejong@bw.kun.nl.

Banks and Banking Reform --- Budget --- Budget Constraints --- Capital Markets --- Cash Flow --- Debt Markets --- Economic Theory and Research --- Emerging Markets --- Finance --- Finance and Financial Sector Development --- Financial Crisis --- Financial Institutions --- Financial Intermediation --- Financial Literacy --- Financial Market --- Financial Structure --- Financial System --- Financial Weakness --- Investment --- Investment Function --- Investment Projects --- Liquidity --- Liquidity Constraints --- Macroeconomics and Economic Growth --- Market --- Market Economies --- Market Economy --- Private Sector Development --- Transition Economies

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

The authors investigate the microfinance regulatory regimes in Benin, Ghana, and Tanzania, with a view to identifying key issues and lessons on how the overall regulatory framework affects integration of microfinance institutions into the financial system. The authors find that recognizing different tiers of both regulated and unregulated institutions in a financial structure facilitates financial deepening and outreach to otherwise underserved groups in urban and rural areas. That environment promotes sustainable microfinance under shared performance standards and encourages regulatory authorities to develop appropriate prudential regulations and staff capacity. Case studies of the three countries raise important issues on promoting microfinance development vis-a-vis regulating them. Laws to regulate activities other than intermediation of public deposits into loans can result in disproportionately restrictive and unmanageable standards, even as dynamic microfinance sectors have emerged without conducive regulatory regimes. The authors use the three countries' regulatory experiences to highlight the importance of differentiating when prudential supervision is warranted and when regulatory oversight suffices, and to identify the agencies to carry out regulation. They address an important issue that has received scant attention, measuring and paying for the costs of regulating microfinance, and the need to build technical capacity of supervisory and regulatory staff.

Bank --- Banks and Banking Reform --- Banque Centrale Des Etats De L'afrique De L'ouest --- Capital Adequacy --- Cred Credit Unions --- Debt Markets --- Deposits --- Emerging Markets --- Finance and Financial Sector Development --- Financial Deepening --- Financial Institutions --- Financial Literacy --- Financial Structure --- Financial Systems --- Laws --- Legal Framework --- Legislation --- Loans --- Microfinance --- Private Sector Development --- Prudential Regulations --- Regulatory Framework --- Reserve Requirements --- Risk --- Rural Banks

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

April 2000 - Debt-equity ratios do not tend to increase after financial liberalization, but there is a shift from long-term to short-term debt. Globalization has uneven effects for firms with and without access to international capital markets. Countries with deeper domestic financial markets are less affected by financial liberalization. Schmukler and Vesperoni investigate whether integration with global markets affects the financing choices of firms from East Asia and Latin America. Using firm-level data for the 1980s and 1990s, they study how leverage ratios, the structure of debt maturity, and sources of financing change when economies are liberalized and when firms gain access to international equity and bond markets. The evidence shows that integration with world financial markets has uneven effects. On the one hand, debt maturity for the average firm shortens when countries undertake financial liberalization. On the other hand, domestic firms that actually participate in international markets get better financing opportunities and extend their debt maturity. Moreover, firms in economies with deeper domestic financial systems are affected less by financial liberalization. Finally, they show that leverage ratios increase during times of crisis. In an appendix, they analyze the previously unstudied case of Argentina, which experienced sharp financial liberalization and was hit hard by all recent global crises. This paper - a product of Macroeconomics and Growth, Development Reseach Group - is part of a larger effort in the group to understand financial development and financial integration. The authors may be contacted at sschmukler@worldbank.org or vesperon@wam.umd.edu.

Banks and Banking Reform --- Bond --- Bond Markets --- Debt --- Debt Markets --- Debt Maturity --- Debt-Equity --- Economic Development --- Emerging Economies --- Emerging Markets --- Equity --- Finance and Financial Sector Development --- Financial Liberalization --- Financial Markets --- Financial Structure --- Financial Systems --- Globalization --- International Bond --- International Financial Markets --- International Markets --- Maturity Structure --- Private Sector Development --- Share --- World Financial Markets