Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
In Enthymemes and Topoi in Dialogue, Ellen Breitholtz presents a novel and precise account of reasoning from an interactional perspective. The account draws on the concepts of enthymemes and topoi, originating in Aristotelian rhetoric and dialectic, and integrates these in a formal dialogue semantic account using TTR, a type theory with records. Argumentation analysis and formal approaches to reasoning often focus the logical validity of arguments on inferences made in discourse from a god’s-eye perspective. In contrast, Breitholtz’s account emphasises the individual perspectives of interlocutors and the function and acceptability of their reasoning in context. This provides an analysis of interactions where interlocutors have access to different topoi and therefore make different inferences. Readership: All interested in the pragmatics-rhetoric interface and in theories of meaning and coherence in dialogue and discourse.
Conversation analysis. --- Enthymeme (Logic) --- Language and logic. --- Linguistics and logic --- Logic in language --- Language and languages --- Logic --- Semantics --- Syllogism --- Analysis of conversation --- CA (Interpersonal communication) --- Conversational analysis --- Oral communication --- Philosophy --- Semantics & pragmatics --- Linguistics. --- Reasoning. --- Toposes.
Choose an application
Spanning a variety of disciplines, this 1995 enquiry focuses on one particular Pauline characteristic: the apostle's habit of making matters of faith the object of logical appraisal. A tracing of the elliptical patterns of argument in Romans 1-8 illustrates this habit and, at the same time, displays how Paul's vigorous persistence in it seems often not to be matched by the solidity, or at any rate the lucidity, of his logic. By viewing Paul against the background of semiology, more especially the semiological theory of Umberto Eco, new light is shed on the genesis of Paul's reasoning. The discussion which ensues is marked by an interesting and productive combination of modern linguistics and classical logic. Moreover, the singular potential of today's techniques of 'fuzzy' logical analysis for measuring the intellectual muscle of Paul's argumentation is brought out dramatically by the uniqueness of his semiological situation. His rationality takes on a new face.
Enthymeme (Logic) --- 227.1*1 --- #GROL:SEMI-225<08> Soci 82 --- #GROL:SEMI-227.1*1 --- Logic --- Syllogism --- Brief van Paulus aan de Romeinen --- 227.1*1 Brief van Paulus aan de Romeinen --- Bible. --- Faith and reason --- Criticism, interpretation, etc. --- Christianity. --- Arts and Humanities --- Religion
Choose an application
Enthymeme (Logic) --- 227.1 --- 227.1 Brieven van Paulus--(algemeen) --- Brieven van Paulus--(algemeen) --- Logic --- Syllogism --- Bible. --- Epistles of Paul --- Paul, Epistles of --- Paul Sŏsin --- Pauline epistles --- Risālat al-Qiddīs Būlus al-rasūl al-thāniyah ilá Tīmūthīʼūs --- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
Choose an application
"Examines the concept of the enthymeme in ancient Greek rhetoric, arguing that it is a technique of storytelling aimed at eliciting from the audience an inference about a narrative"--
Narration (Rhetoric) --- Rhetoric, Ancient --- Syllogism --- Enthymeme (Logic) --- Logic --- Narrative (Rhetoric) --- Narrative writing --- Rhetoric --- Discourse analysis, Narrative --- Narratees (Rhetoric) --- Argumentation --- Reasoning --- Logic, Symbolic and mathematical --- Ancient rhetoric --- Classical languages --- Greek language --- Greek rhetoric --- Latin language --- Latin rhetoric --- E-books --- Syllogism. --- Rhetoric, Ancient. --- Argument. --- Aristotle. --- Enthymeme. --- Inference. --- Logos. --- Lysias. --- Narrative Reasoning. --- Narrative. --- Orators. --- Oratory. --- Rhetoric.
Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|