Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

What is desert? The aim of this book is to give an analysis of this notion. Starting from Feinberg's seminal paper, the argument goes on to Chisholm, 18th-century British Rationalism, and Kant, who developed the concept of propriety that is the foundation of the concept of desert and the key to understanding it. Beyond the analysis, the concept of desert is applied to two problems of moral philosophy, punishment and moral residue, that can be solved only by means of this notion. Desert is an indispensable moral concept we do well to understand clearly and to incorporate into our moral practice

Merit (Ethics) --- Desert (Ethics) --- Moral desert (Ethics) --- Ethics --- General ethics

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Justice (Philosophy) --- Merit (Ethics) --- Desert (Ethics) --- Moral desert (Ethics) --- Ethics --- Philosophy

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

The idea that citizens' advancement should depend exclusively on merit, on qualities that deserve reward rather than on bloodlines or wire-pulling, was among the Founding ideals of the American republic, Joseph F. Kett argues in this provocative and engaging book. Merit's history, he contends, is best understood within the context of its often conflicting interaction with the other ideals of the Founding, equal rights and government by consent. Merit implies difference; equality suggests sameness. By sanctioning selection of those lower down by those higher up, merit potentially conflicts with the republican ideal that citizens consent to the decisions that affect their lives.In Merit, which traces the history of its subject over three centuries, Kett asserts that Americans have reconciled merit with other principles of the Founding in ways that have shaped their distinctive approach to the grading of public schools, report cards, the forging of workplace hierarchies, employee rating forms, merit systems in government, the selection of officers for the armed forces, and standardized testing for intelligence, character, and vocational interests. Today, the concept of merit is most commonly associated with measures by which it is quantified.Viewing their merit as an element of their selfhood-essential merit-members of the Founding generation showed no interest in quantitative measurements. Rather, they equated merit with an inner quality that accounted for their achievements and that was best measured by their reputations among their peers. In a republic based on equal rights and consent of the people, however, it became important to establish that merit-based rewards were within the grasp of ordinary Americans. In response, Americans embraced institutional merit in the form of procedures focused on drawing small distinctions among average people. They also developed a penchant for increasing the number of winners in competitions-what Kett calls "selection in" rather than "selection out"-in order to satisfy popular aspirations. Kett argues that values rooted in the Founding of the republic continue to influence Americans' approach to controversies, including those surrounding affirmative action, which involve the ideal of merit.

National characteristics, American --- Social values --- Merit (Ethics) --- Values --- Desert (Ethics) --- Moral desert (Ethics) --- Ethics --- History. --- Social aspects --- United States

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Serena Olsaretti brings together new essays by moral and political philosophers on the nature of desert and justice, their relations with each other and with other values.

Merit (Ethics) --- Justice (Philosophy) --- Distributive justice --- Philosophy --- Ethics --- Philosophy & Religion --- Desert (Ethics) --- Moral desert (Ethics) --- Distribution (Economic theory) --- Justice --- Social justice --- Wealth --- Philosophy. --- Moral and ethical aspects

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

From New York Times bestselling author and economics columnist Robert Frank, a compelling book that explains why the rich underestimate the importance of luck in their success, why that hurts everyone, and what we can do about itHow important is luck in economic success? No question more reliably divides conservatives from liberals. As conservatives correctly observe, people who amass great fortunes are almost always talented and hardworking. But liberals are also correct to note that countless others have those same qualities yet never earn much. In recent years, social scientists have discovered that chance plays a much larger role in important life outcomes than most people imagine. In Success and Luck, bestselling author and New York Times economics columnist Robert Frank explores the surprising implications of those findings to show why the rich underestimate the importance of luck in success-and why that hurts everyone, even the wealthy.Frank describes how, in a world increasingly dominated by winner-take-all markets, chance opportunities and trivial initial advantages often translate into much larger ones-and enormous income differences-over time; how false beliefs about luck persist, despite compelling evidence against them; and how myths about personal success and luck shape individual and political choices in harmful ways.But, Frank argues, we could decrease the inequality driven by sheer luck by adopting simple, unintrusive policies that would free up trillions of dollars each year-more than enough to fix our crumbling infrastructure, expand healthcare coverage, fight global warming, and reduce poverty, all without requiring painful sacrifices from anyone. If this sounds implausible, you'll be surprised to discover that the solution requires only a few, noncontroversial steps.Compellingly readable, Success and Luck shows how a more accurate understanding of the role of chance in life could lead to better, richer, and fairer economies and societies.

Economics --- Merit (Ethics) --- Success --- Fortune --- Luck --- Opportunity --- Growth (Psychology) --- Personal development --- Personal growth --- Self-improvement --- Conduct of life --- Failure (Psychology) --- Fear of success --- Desert (Ethics) --- Moral desert (Ethics) --- Ethics --- Economic sociology --- Socio-economics --- Socioeconomics --- Sociology of economics --- Sociology --- Behavioral economics --- Behavioural economics --- Psychological aspects --- Sociological aspects --- Economic aspects --- Social aspects